Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 10, Number 1—January 2004

Correction

Correction Vol. 9, No. 11

Cite This Article

Close

Highlight and copy the desired format.

EID Correction Vol. 9, No. 11. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(1):160. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.C21001
AMA Correction Vol. 9, No. 11. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2004;10(1):160. doi:10.3201/eid1001.C21001.
APA (2004). Correction Vol. 9, No. 11. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(1), 160. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1001.C21001.

In “Genetic Variation among Temporally and Geographically Distinct West Nile Virus Isolates, United States, 2001, 2002”, by C. Todd Davis, et al., errors occurred in Tables 1 and 2. The correct title for Table 1 is “Nucleotide mutations in sequences of the prM gene of 22 West Nile virus isolates obtained during 2001 and 2002 compared to WN-NY99.” In Table 1, line 6, Nueces Co., Tx-1, under “prM 491” should read “G (Arg)”; line 19, Galveston Co, TX-2, under “prM 679” should read “A (Thr).” The correct title for Table 2 is “Nucleotide mutations in sequences of the E gene of 22 West Nile virus isolates obtained during 2001 and 2001 compared to WNNY99.”

In Table 2, line 3, Harris Co., TX, under “Envelope 2,392,” should read “A (Thr)”; line 8, Nueces Co., TX-2, under “Envelope 1,118,” should read “U (Val)”; line 12, Randall Co., TX, under “1,192” should read “C (Asn)”; line 24, Galveston Co., TX-3, under “Envelope 1,192” should read “G (Ala).” Corrected versions of Tables 1 and 2 are available at: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/9/11/03-0301_article.htm.

We regret any confusion these errors may have caused.

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1001.C21001

Table of Contents – Volume 10, Number 1—January 2004

TOP