Volume 10, Number 12—December 2004
West Nile Virus Viremia in Wild Rock Pigeons
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Allison AB, Mead DG, Gibbs SE, Hoffman DM, Stallknecht DE. West Nile Virus Viremia in Wild Rock Pigeons. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(12):2252-2255. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1012.040511|
|AMA||Allison AB, Mead DG, Gibbs SE, et al. West Nile Virus Viremia in Wild Rock Pigeons. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2004;10(12):2252-2255. doi:10.3201/eid1012.040511.|
|APA||Allison, A. B., Mead, D. G., Gibbs, S. E., Hoffman, D. M., & Stallknecht, D. E. (2004). West Nile Virus Viremia in Wild Rock Pigeons. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 10(12), 2252-2255. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1012.040511.|
Feral rock pigeons were screened for neutralizing antibodies to West Nile virus (WNV) during late winter/spring and summer of 2002 and 2003. Additionally, virus isolation from serum was attempted from 269 birds collected during peak transmission periods. The observed viremia levels and seroprevalence indicate that this species could be involved in amplifying WNV in urban settings.
The prototypical amplifying host for most bird-maintained arboviruses, such as West Nile virus (WNV) (Flavivirus; Flaviviridae), is a species that is locally abundant and readily accessible to arthropod vectors, develops a high level of viremia for an extended duration, and does not develop clinical disease (1). Therefore, both the bionomics of the bird species (e.g., population numbers, distribution, association with human habitation/mosquitoes) and its host competence (i.e., susceptibility to infection and ability to circulate virus at titers high enough to infect vectors) need to be evaluated when assessing whether it may be important in amplifying WNV (1). Historically, potential host competency for WNV has been determined through experimental infections (2–4) and, accordingly, supporting viremia levels from free-ranging birds to validate such laboratory-derived competence indices are usually unavailable.
Knowledge regarding the potential host competency of most North American bird species for WNV is limited. In a recent study, Komar et al. experimentally determined WNV viremia levels for 25 bird species encompassing 17 families, whereby an index for reservoir competence was calculated based on the susceptibility of each species to infection, the mean daily infectiousness, and the duration of infectious viremia (5). As all species tested were susceptible to infection, the calculated reservoir competence was therefore inherently dependent on the magnitude and duration of viremia. Species that had viremia levels of <105 PFU/mL were considered to be noninfectious for two enzootic vectors, Culex pipiens and Cx. quinquefasciatus, and hence deemed incompetent hosts. Rock pigeons (Columba livia) were included in this group.
Rock pigeons are distributed throughout the entire continental United States and are a gregarious and abundant species, especially in urbanized areas. Field studies have demonstrated that this species has high seroprevalence rates (6–8) and therefore may be useful as a sentinel to monitor WNV transmission. Additionally, rock pigeons are nonmigratory, which allows for a more accurate determination of approximate sites of exposure than nonresident species. The objectives of this study were to assess the extent of natural infection in free-ranging rock pigeons from metropolitan Atlanta 1 and 2 years subsequent to the recognition of WNV in Georgia and to field-validate experimental results relating to potential levels of viremia in this species.
During February, March, and August 2002 and April, July, and September 2003, rock pigeons from a northwest Atlanta rail yard, Fulton County, Georgia (33°48′40.1′N, 84°27′28.4′′) (Figure), were collected by Wildlife Services personnel by using rocket nets as part of a cooperative nuisance wildlife removal project. Captured birds were identified as hatch-year or adult before being bled by brachial venipuncture for serum collection. A subset of these birds was transferred to captivity as part of an unrelated study. Serum samples collected during late winter/spring (February–April) were frozen at –70°C until screening for antibodies by a plaque-reduction neutralization test (PRNT). Serum samples collected during summer transmission periods (July–September) were tested for circulating virus before being frozen at –70°C until further processing (see below). From 8 separate collections, 499 pigeons were sampled during the 2-year period.
WNV antibody titers were determined by PRNT (6), with the following modifications. Infected Vero Middle America Research Unit (MARU) cell cultures were overlaid with 1% gum tragacanth/1x minimum essential media (MEM) (supplemented with 2.2 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 3% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum, 200 units/mL penicillin, 200 μg/mL streptomycin, and 500 ng/mL amphotericin B) rather than agarose, and cultures were inactivated on day 4 postadsorption with 10% buffered formalin and stained with 0.25% crystal violet for plaque visualization. Additionally, 100 pigeons from the August 2002 collection were also tested for antibodies to pigeon paramyxovirus-1 (PPMV-1) (Avulavirus; Paramyxoviridae) by a hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test (9).
For statistical analysis, seroprevalence between late winter/spring and summer collections were compared by using a Yates corrected chi-square test (Epi Info version 3.2.2) and 95% confidence intervals were determined according to Newcombe (10). Serum samples collected during summer months (July–September) were screened for circulating virus before being frozen at –70°C until titration (positive) or PRNT (negative). Briefly, 5 μL of serum was inoculated into a 2-mL culture of 2-day-old Vero MARU cells and monitored daily for cytopathic effects. WNV isolates were identified by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction by using degenerate WNV-specific primers (WN310F, sense primer: 5′-GTSAACAAAACAAACAGCRATGAA-3′; WN686R, antisense primer: 5′-ACWGMTGAYTTYGTGCACCA-3′) that amplify a 376-bp fragment spanning the nucleocapsid and premembrane genes. The Newcastle disease virus (NDV) isolate was identified by using primers directed against the fusion protein gene (sense primer, 5′-CCTTGGTTGAITCTATCCGIAG-3′; antisense primer, 5′-CTGCCACTGCTAGTTGIGATAATCC-3′) (11) and further classified as PPMV-1 by monoclonal antibody binding profiles (12).
Viral titers of WNV-positive serum samples collected during the summer were determined by plaque assay. Briefly, samples were rapidly thawed from –70°C, and 200 μL of each 10-fold dilution (10-1–10-6) of serum in MEM was added to duplicate wells of a six-well plate seeded with 4-day-old Vero MARU cells. Adsorption, overlay, and staining procedures were performed as in the PRNT protocol. Dilutions in which 20–100 plaques could be counted (when applicable) were used in determining WNV titers (log10 PFU/mL).
WNV-specific antibodies were detected in 128 (25.7%) of 499 rock pigeons tested (Table 1). Overall seroprevalence rates per collection for 2002 were 16%–45% and 11%–50% in 2003. Significant differences in seroprevalence rates were observed between late winter/spring collections (February–April, 37.4%) versus summer collections (July–September, 15.6%) (p < 0.0000001). Of the 133 samples with >90% plaque reduction on the initial screen, 128 were WNV-positive (96.2%), 4 were flavivirus-positive (3.0%), and 1 was St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV)–positive (0.8%). Of 269 birds tested for virus isolation, 11 (4.1%) were viremic (Table 2). Viremia levels were 102.2 to 107.2 PFU/mL (mean = 104.0 PFU/mL).
In 2002–2003, we conducted a serologic study on WNV exposure rates of rock pigeons from a single locale adjacent to metropolitan Atlanta. Consistent with previous studies documenting high WNV exposure rates in this species (6–8), overall seroprevalence rates per collection for 2002 were 16%–45% and 11%–50% in 2003. The seasonal discrepancy in seroprevalence between late winter/spring collections (37.4%) versus summer collections (15.6%) may be partially ascribed to the influx of naïve juveniles into the population during months of quiescent or reduced virus activity before the onset of peak transmission in late summer.
Of 269 birds tested for virus isolation, 11 (4.1%) were viremic. Since viremic birds were provisionally identified by cell culture, the lag time from serum collection to virus isolation did not afford daily screening for subsequent serum titers. Thus, we cannot delineate the daily mean titer, maximum titer, or duration of viremia for any of these birds. With an overall average WNV viremia titer of 104.0 PFU/mL, our findings are similar to the daily mean titers (102.9–104.3 PFU/mL) of rock pigeons reported in experimental infections (5). However, while the maximum titer seen experimentally (104.8 PFU/mL) was below the inferred threshold necessary to infect Cx. pipiens and Cx. quinquefasciatus (105.0 PFU/mL), 2 of 11 (18%) naturally infected birds had titers in excess of this threshold.
Of note, the rock pigeon with the highest WNV viremia titer (107.2 PFU/mL) became ill 8 days postcapture and died within 72 hours of the onset of clinical signs. PPMV-1, an antigenic variant of NDV, was subsequently isolated from brain and heart tissue. PPMV-1 was not detected in serum. Whether the high-level WNV titer in this viremic pigeon was influenced by coinfection with PPMV-1 (or an undetected pathogen) or whether the level is normal and may occur under natural conditions cannot be determined. Although the effects of WNV coinfection with most microbes and parasites remains unknown, antibodies to PPMV-1 were detected in 68% (N = 100) birds tested, and numerous additional pathogenic viruses, bacteria, protozoa, fungi, and helminths have been isolated from free-ranging rock pigeons (13). These findings suggest that multiple concomitant infections may occur with regularity in feral populations.
Rock pigeons are intimately associated with urbanization, such that stable populations do not exist outside of human development. Although accurate U.S. population numbers are not available, censuses from various North American cities have estimated urban densities to be in range of 11.4 to 30.8 birds/km2 (14). This number would equate to a rock pigeon population of 1.7–4.6 million for a city the size of Atlanta. As rock pigeons are ubiquitous in all cities and towns throughout the United States, they could potentially provide an abundant host for enzootic/epizootic vectors such as Cx. tarsalis and Cx. quinquefasciatus, both of which have been shown to preferentially bloodfeed on columbiforms (15,16).
Apart from the study by Komar et al., which, because of its extensive scope, only included six pigeons for viremia determinations, detailed species-specific experimental and field studies assessing the competency of common, urbanized bird species for North American strains of WNV are lacking (5). Although the overall viremia titers obtained from naturally infected birds corroborate previous experimental reports that rock pigeons generally maintain low-level viremia titers in relation to passerine species (2–5), there were outliers that exhibited titers sufficient to infect engorging mosquitoes. This finding exemplifies the need, as duly noted by Komar et al., that experimentally derived competence indices should be consolidated with field data to better estimate host potential (5). To our knowledge, this is the first report of viremia levels from wild birds naturally infected with WNV.
Mr. Allison is a graduate student in the Department of Infectious Diseases and a research technician at the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia. His research interests are in the biology and pathogenesis of encephalitic arboviruses.
We thank the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study personnel who assisted in blood collection and serum separation, Daniel J. King and Phillip Curry for characterization of the NDV isolate as PPMV-1, Robert Lanciotti for SLEV strain TBH-28, and the United States Geological Survey for permission to use the digital orthophoto quadrangle of the northwest Atlanta rail yard.
Funding for this research was provided by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Grant U50/CCU420515-02. Additional supplemental support was provided through the Federal Aid to Wildlife Restoration Act (50 Stat. 917) and through sponsorship of the Southeastern Cooperative Wildlife Disease Study from fish and wildlife agencies in Alabama, Arkansas, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, Missouri, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Puerto Rico, South Carolina, Tennessee, Virginia, and West Virginia.
- World Health Organization. Arthropod-borne and rodent-borne viral diseases, Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1985;719:1–116.
- Work TH, Hurlbut HS, Taylor RM. Indigenous wild birds of the Nile delta as potential West Nile virus circulating reservoirs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1955;4:872–88.
- Taylor RM, Work TH, Hurlbut HS, Rizk F. A study of the ecology of West Nile virus in Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1956;5:579–620.
- Jupp PG. The ecology of West Nile virus in South Africa and the occurrence of outbreaks in humans. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001;951:143–52.
- Komar N, Langevin S, Hinten S, Nemeth N, Edwards E, Bunning M, Experimental infection of North American birds with the New York strain of West Nile virus. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:311–22.
- Komar N, Panella NA, Burns JE, Dusza SW, Mascarenhas TM, Talbot TO. Serologic evidence for West Nile virus infection in birds in the New York City vicinity during an outbreak in 1999. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:621–5.
- Komar N, Burns J, Dean C, Panella NA, Dusza S, Cherry B. Serologic evidence for West Nile virus infection in birds in Staten Island, New York, after an outbreak in 2000. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2001;1:191–6.
- Ringia AM, Blitvich BJ, Koo H-Y, Van de Wyngaerde M, Brawn JD, Novak RJ. Antibody prevalence of West Nile virus in birds, Illinois, 2002. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10:1120–4.
- King DJ. Influence of chicken breed on pathogenicity evaluation of velogenic Newcastle disease virus isolates from cormorants and turkeys. Avian Dis. 1996;40:210–7.
- Newcombe RG. Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17:857–72.
- Seal BS, King DJ, Bennett JD. Characterization of Newcastle disease virus isolates by reverse transcription PCR coupled to direct nucleotide sequencing and development of sequence database for pathotype prediction and molecular epidemiological analysis. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:2624–30.
- Kommers GD, King DJ, Seal BS, Brown CC. Virulence of pigeon-origin Newcastle disease virus isolates for domestic chickens. Avian Dis. 2001;45:906–21.
- Johnston RF, Janiga M. Feral pigeons. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 1995. p. 320.
- Johnston RF. Rock Dove. In: Poole A, Stettenheim P, Gill F, editors. The birds of North America. Philadelphia: Academy of Natural Sciences; 1992. No. 13. p. 1–13.
- Tempelis CH, Reeves WC, Bellamy RE, Lofy MF. A three-year study of the feeding habits of Culex tarsalis in Kern County, California. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1965;14:170–7.
- Bertsch ML, Norment BR. The host-feeding patterns of Culex quinquefasciatus in Mississippi. Mosq News. 1983;43:203–6.
- Figure. Satellite image of northwest Atlanta rail yard, Fulton County, Georgia, which shows its close proximity to human habitation (courtesy of the United States Geological Survey).
- Table 1. Flavivirus seroprevalence rates in free-ranging rock pigeons from northwest rail yard, Fulton County, Georgia, 2002–2003a
- Table 2. West Nile virus (WNV) viremia titers of free-ranging rock pigeons from northwest rail yard, Fulton County, Georgia, 2002–2003
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Andrew Allison, Department of Infectious Diseases, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-7393, USA; fax: 706-542-5865
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: April 14, 2011
- Page last updated: April 14, 2011
- Page last reviewed: April 14, 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)