Volume 10, Number 3—March 2004
Typhus Group Rickettsiae Antibodies in Rural Mexico
To the Editor: In 2002, the risk of transmission of epidemic typhus in the state of Mexico was assessed by analyzing serum specimens from 393 residents of previous typhogenic areas for immunoglobulin (Ig) G antibodies against Rickettsia prowazekii. Louseborne typhus has been a historic scourge in Mexico. In 1576, in a population of 9 million, 2 million deaths were attributed to epidemic typhus (1). These illnesses primarily affected indigenous peoples, who called the illness cocolixtle and matlazahuatl (2).
In 1951 a national campaign against louseborne typhus was begun by using newly developed technologic approaches, antibiotics, and insecticides, resulting in decreases in the incidence and case-fatality rate. In 1951 >1,000 cases and 737 deaths caused by epidemic typhus were reported in 18 states, and 6,781 localities were identified as at risk (3). By 1965, only 36 cases and no deaths were reported from 12 states with 4,841 localities at risk. Most cases occurred during the cold months of November–April. One third of cases occurred in persons 19–29 years of age with nearly 40% of the deaths in patients aged 15–44 years. In 1979, 10 years had passed without any cases of epidemic typhus reported in Mexico. In the 1980s, three outbreaks of typhus occurred in rural communities, two in Chiapas and one in the state of Mexico (4).
In the state of Mexico, during the period 1893–1907, 7,353 epidemic typhus deaths were reported (annual mortality rate, 52.4/100,000 population); from 1939 to 1943, 1,220 cases were reported with 707 deaths (annual mortality rate, 12.1/100,000 population); and from 1959 to 1963, 64 cases were reported with 14 deaths (annual mortality rate, 0.1/100,000 population) (3). In 1967, Atlacomulco, a county in the state of Mexico that had been free of typhus for 5 years, experienced an outbreak of louseborne typhus associated with a case of Brill-Zinsser disease in a 76-year-old man who had a history of epidemic typhus. Forty cases were diagnosed and one death occurred (3). The last outbreak in the state of Mexico occurred in 1983 in San Juan Cote in San Felipe del Progreso County, with 22 ill persons and one death (4). Since then, a public health program against Pediculus humanus corporis has been conducted in five counties with epidemiologic surveillance for cases of reactivation of latent infection. At the beginning of the 1980s, the rate of infestation with P. humanus corporis (mazahua) in the indigenous population of the state of Mexico was 100%; in 1988, 58%; and in 1990, 15%. In 1999, indices of infestation between 5% and 12% were detected in this population (5).
In 2002, personnel from the office of the Secretary of Health of the State of Mexico evaluated the risk to the population who lived in previously typhogenic areas to measure the impact of their programs (5). In a cross-sectional study, 393 human serum specimens were analyzed by immunofluorescence assay (IFA) for IgG antibodies against R. prowazekii, and a titer of 64 or higher was considered positive (6). Antibodies against R. prowazekii were detected in 74 serum samples (seropositivity, 18.8%; 26% for males and 18% for females). The prevalence of antibodies to R. prowazekii increased with age; 1–14 years of age (seropositivity 0%), 15–24 years (14%), 25–44 years (17%), 45–64 years (24%), and >65 years (48%). Thirty-three (45%) of the serum specimens had a titer of 64, 25 (34%) had a titer of 128, and 16 (22%) had a higher titer. All eight serum specimens with a titer of >512 were from persons >45 years of age.
The high seroprevalence suggests that this population had extensive exposure to the agent of typhus and its louse vector in the past. The finding of two subjects aged >65 years with a titer of 1,024 and four subjects aged >45 years with a titer of 512 suggests reactivation of latent R. prowazekii with a resulting boost in their antibody titers. These possible cases of Brill-Zinsser disease were likely not severely ill and recovered either with antimicrobial treatment that was effective against R. prowazekii or by immune control of the infection without a specific diagnosis.
That IgG antibodies against R. prowazekii are absent in young persons suggests that this rickettsia has not been circulating in this population during recent years. The high seroprevalence suggests a human reservoir of latent R. prowazekii in this population. The presence of human body lice in this population indicates that there is risk of spreading R. prowazekii from an index patient with Brill-Zinsser disease to persons in contact with the patient.
Although the general lack of attention to R. prowazekii by scientists, physicians, and public health agencies would lead one to believe that typhus has been eliminated as a public health concern, the recent occurrence of a large epidemic in Burundi (7), infected lice in Rwanda, an outbreak in Russia, a documented case originating in Algeria, and outbreaks every year in Andean Peru (8) indicate that global attention should be directed to surveillance, risk assessment, diagnostic capability, and planning for rapid epidemic control to avoid establishing a large reservoir of latent infection for future epidemics originating from recrudescent typhus in louse-infested populations. Typhus likely poses a similar threat in other parts of the world including the Himalayas, Andes, Afghanistan, and highlands of Africa. Even in industrialized countries, the diagnosis of typhus is likely to be delayed or missed. The potential threat of bioterrorist-disseminated, aerosol-transmitted typhus emphasizes that enhanced attention to and knowledge of typhus are needed throughout the world (9). The requirement concerns not only physician awareness but also wide availability and application of the most appropriate diagnostic laboratory methods.
- Fernández del Castillo F. El tifus en México antes de Zinsser. In: Florescano E, Malvido E, editors. Ensayos sobre la historia de las epidemias en México. México City: Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; 1982, vol. 1. p. 127–135.
- Somolinos d’Ardois G. La epidemia de cocolixlte de 1545 señalada en un códice. In: Florescano E, Malvido E, editors. Ensayos sobre la historia de las epidemias en México. México City: Instituto Méxicano del Seguro Social; 1982, vol. 1. p. 233.
- de Salubridad S, General de Epidemiología D. Tifo transmitido por piojos. México City: SSA; 1979. p. 19–74.
- Dirección General de Epidemiología. Boletín Epidemiologico EPI-1-85, p. 15.
- Gallardo EG, Díaz G, Hernández-Gómez LA, Ortiz-Solalinde G, Ramírez-Hernández JA, Medina I. La eliminacion del uso de DDT en salud publica: su impacto en el riesgo de transmision de tifo exantematico en México. México City: Instituto de Salud del Estado de México; 2000. p. 1–20.
- Philip RN, Casper EA, Ormsbee RA, Peacock MG, Burgdorfer W. Microimmuno-fluorescence test for the serological study of Rocky Mountain spotted fever and typhus.J Clin Microbiol. 1976;3:51–61.
- Raoult D, Ndihokubwayo JB, Tissot-Dupont H, Faugere B, Abegbinni R, Birtles RJ. Outbreak of epidemic typhus associated with trench fever in Burundi.Lancet. 1998;352:353–8.
- Walker DH, Zavala-Velázquez JE, Ramírez G, Olano JP. Emerging infectious diseases in the Americas. In: Raoult D, Brouqui P, editors. Rickettsiae and rickettsial diseases at the turn of the third millenium. Paris: Elsevier; 1999. p. 274–7.
- Walker DH. Principles of the malicious use of infectious agents to create terror. Reasons for concern for organisms of the genus Rickettsia.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003;990:739–42.
Suggested citation: Alcantara VE, Gallardo EG, Hong C, Walker DH. Typhus group rickettsiae antibodies in rural Mexico. Emerg Infect Dis [serial online] 2004 Mar [date cited]. Available from: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/10/3/03-0438
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
David H. Walker, Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, 301 University Blvd., Keiller Bldg., Galveston, TX 77555-0609, USA; fax: 409-772-1850:
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: June 14, 2011
- Page last updated: June 14, 2011
- Page last reviewed: June 14, 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)