Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 11, Number 1—January 2005
Dispatch

Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing Genotype, Northern Malawi

Judith R. Glynn*Comments to Author , Amelia C. Crampin*†, Hamidou Traore*, Malcolm D. Yates‡, Frank D. Mwaungulu†, Bagrey M. Ngwira†, Steven D. Chaguluka†, Donex T. Mwafulirwa†, Sian Floyd*, Caroline Murphy‡, Francis A. Drobniewski‡, and Paul E.M. Fine*
Author affiliations: *London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom; †Karonga Prevention Study, Chilumba, Malawi; ‡Kings College Hospital (Dulwich), London, United Kingdom

Main Article

Table

Comparison of persons with Beijing and non-Beijing genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Characteristic Beijing genotype, n (%) Other genotypes, n (%) p value
Sex 0.001
Male 10 (22.7) 472 (47.9)
Female 34 (77.3) 513 (52.1)
Age group 0.3
<15 2 (4.6) 16 (1.6)
15–29 17 (38.6) 306 (31.1)
30–44 16 (36.4) 423 (42.9)
>45 9 (20.5) 240 (24.4)
Born in Malawi 0.08
Yes 38 (90.5) 747 (79.2)
No 4 (9.5) 196 (20.8)
Moved in last 5 y 0.8
No move 16 (40.0) 343 (41.2)
Within district 10 (25.0) 188 (22.6)
Outside district 9 (22.5) 226 (27.1)
Outside country 5 (12.5) 76 (9.1)
HIV status 0.4
Positive 15 (57.7) 396 (65.6)
Negative 11 (42.3) 208 (34.4)
Previous tuberculosis (TB) 0.9
Yes 3 (6.8) 74 (7.6)
No 41 (93.2) 904 (92.4)
BCG scar 0.7
Yes 23 (74.2) 486 (69.7)
No 6 (19.4) 176 (25.3)
Doubtful 2 (6.5) 35 (5.0)
Contact with TB patient in district 0.6
Yes 22 (50.0) 453 (46.0)
No 22 (50.0) 532 (54.0)
Type of TB 0.4
Smear-positive pulmonary 33 (75.0) 711 (72.2)
Smear-negative pulmonary 10 (22.7) 202 (20.5)
Extrapulmonary 1 (2.3) 72 (7.3)
Drug resistance 0.2
Sensitive 44 (100) 920 (93.9)
Resistant isoniazid only 0 38 (3.9)
Resistant isoniazid plus 0 22 (2.2)
Died during treatment 0.7
Yes 13 (32.5) 224 (29.6)
No 27 (67.5) 532 (70.4)

Main Article

Page created: April 15, 2011
Page updated: April 15, 2011
Page reviewed: April 15, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external