Volume 11, Number 11—November 2005

Dispatch

Vibrio cholerae Pathogenic Clones

Anna Salim*, Ruiting Lan†, and Peter R. Reeves* 

Author affiliations: *University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; †University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Main Article

Figure 1

Figure 1. Distribution of base differences in strains of Vibrio cholerae. The base positions relative to the start of the ATG codon are shown. Isolates 395 and E9120 were compared for the fruK, lytB, metE, pepN, pyrG, fumC, malP, metG, pyrC, and sdaA genes, and isolates 395 and E506 were compared for the gyrB gene.

Main Article

Top of Page

The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.