Volume 12, Number 2—February 2006
Cocirculation of Dengue Serotypes, Delhi, India, 2003
To the Editor: Delhi, in the northern part of India, has had outbreaks of dengue caused by various dengue virus types in 1967, 1970, 1982, 1988, and 1996 (1–5). In 1988, for the first time, a few cases of dengue hemorrhagic fever (DHF) were seen (4). Subsequently, we reported the largest outbreak of DHF/dengue shock syndrome (DSS) in Delhi in 1996 and confirmed dengue virus type 2 as the etiologic agent (5).
We report the results of virologic testing of samples received at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences from patients with suspected dengue fever or denguelike illness from Delhi and its adjoining areas during a 2003 outbreak of dengue. According to the World Health Organization (6), 2,185 laboratory-confirmed cases were reported during this outbreak.
Of the blood samples received by the virology laboratory, 42 were received on ice from patients with acute denguelike illness. Serum was separated aseptically and stored at –70°C. The standard method of virus cultivation, which used the C6/36 clone of the Aedes albopictus cell line, was followed with some modifications (7). On days 5 and 10, harvested cells were tested by an indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) using monoclonal antibodies to dengue virus types 1–4 (provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, during the 1996 outbreak). If IFA results were negative for dengue viruses on first passage, a second passage was made, and cells were again harvested on days 5 and 10 for IFA. The 4 dengue virus types (obtained from the National Institute of Virology, Pune, India) were included as positive controls, and uninfected C6/36 cells were kept as negative controls.
Dengue virus could be isolated in C6/36 cells from 8 (19%) of 42 samples processed for virus isolation (Table). Of the 8 isolates, two each were identified as dengue virus types 1 and 2, three as type 3, and one as type 4. All but one isolate were from patients with uncomplicated dengue fever. One dengue type 2 isolate was obtained from a 7-year-old boy with secondary dengue infection and DHF/DSS. The ages of culture-positive patients ranged from 5 to 62 years, with a median of 22 years. These patients were equally distributed between children (<12 years) and adults. The male-to-female ratio for these 8 patients was 5:3. The duration of fever at the time of viral isolation was 1–5 days, with a median of 3 days.
All previous outbreaks in Delhi have occurred during the monsoon (rainy) season between August and November and subsided with the onset of winter. We recently reported the results of serologic testing during the 2003 outbreak, which also occurred from September to November, with a peak in mid-October 2003 (8). This outbreak was milder than the 1996 outbreak, with less illness and death; most patients had uncomplicated dengue fever, and only a few had DHF/DSS. Of the 874 serum samples that we tested, 456 (52.3%) were positive for dengue-specific immunoglobulin M antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Panbio, Sinnamon Park, Queensland, Australia), and more than one third of these were from patients in the 21- to 30-year age group (8).
Dengue virus types 1, 2, and 3 have all been isolated during previous dengue outbreaks in Delhi, but a particular type has always predominated. During the 1996 outbreak of DHF/DSS, we had 26 isolates of dengue virus type 2, but only 1 isolate was identified as dengue type 1 (5). However, we subsequently showed that dengue virus type 1 continued to circulate during the postepidemic period and became the predominant strain (9). Dengue virus type 3 has recently reemerged in South Asia, including north India (10). We now report this culture-confirmed outbreak of dengue from Delhi, during which the simultaneous transmission of all 4 dengue virus types has been demonstrated for the first time in India, with no particular type predominating. This finding suggests that dengue is now truly endemic in this region.
We thank Duane J. Gubler for providing monoclonal antibodies to the dengue serotypes and Chet Ram, Milan Chakraborty, and Raj Kumar for technical support.
- Balaya S, Paul SD, D'Lima LV, Pavri KM. Investigations on an outbreak of dengue in Delhi in 1967. Indian J Med Res. 1969;57:767–74.
- Diesh P, Pattanayak S, Singha P, Arora DD, Mathur PS, Ghosh TK, An outbreak of dengue fever in Delhi—1970. J Commun Dis. 1972;4:13–8.
- Rao CVRM, Bagchi SK, Pinto BD, Ilkal MA, Bharadwaj M, Shaikh BH, The 1982 epidemic of dengue fever in Delhi. Indian J Med Res. 1985;82:271–5.
- Kabra SK, Verma IC, Arora NK, Jain Y, Kalra V. Dengue haemorrhagic fever in children in Delhi. Bull World Health Organ. 1992;70:105–8.
- Dar L, Broor S, Sengupta S, Xess I, Seth P. The first major outbreak of dengue hemorrhagic fever in Delhi, India. Emerg Infect Dis. 1999;5:589–90.
- World Health Organization. Dengue fever in India—update. [cited 12 Nov 2003]. Available from http://who.int/csr/don/2003_11_12/en/
- Gubler DJ, Kuno G, Sather GE, Valez M, Oliver A. Mosquito cell and specific monoclonal antibodies in surveillance for dengue viruses. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1984;33:158–65.
- Gupta E, Dar L, Narang P, Srivastava VK, Broor S. Serodiagnosis of dengue during an outbreak at a tertiary care hospital in Delhi. Indian J Med Res. 2005;121:36–8.
- Vajpayee M, Mohankumar K, Wali JP, Dar L, Seth P, Broor S. Dengue virus infection during post-epidemic period in Delhi, India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1999;30:507–10.
- Dash PK, Saxena P, Abhyankar A, Bhargava R, Jana AM. Emergence of dengue virus type-3 in northern India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2005;36:370–7.
Suggested citation for this article: Dar L, Gupta E, Narang P, Broor S. Cocirculation of dengue serotypes, Delhi, India, 2003 [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. Year and month of publication [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1202.050767
- Page created: February 02, 2012
- Page last updated: February 02, 2012
- Page last reviewed: February 02, 2012
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)