Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 3—March 2006
Letter

Hand Sanitizer Alert

Scott A. Reynolds*Comments to Author , Foster Levy†, and Elaine S. Walker*†
Author affiliations: *James H. Quillen Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Mountain Home, Tennessee, USA; †East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, Tennessee, USA

Main Article

Table

CFU per plate before and after treatment with various concentrations of ethanol

Treatment Mean pretreatment CFU (range) Mean posttreatment CFU (range) No. trials |t|* p* Mean change (%)
Tap water 175 (117–234) 206 (100–321) 4 1.25 0.30 +10
40% ethanol 531 (132–1,413) 621 (75–1,733) 5 0.30 0.39 +3
40% gel 246 (51–602) 232 (56–693) 9 0.61 0.56 +53
62% gel 171 (33–563) 12 (1–24) 9 5.73 <0.001 –82
40%→62% gel 473 (114–1,257) 26 (10–48) 5 6.21 0.003 –90

*|t| = result of paired t test; p = probability of |t|.

Main Article

Page created: January 27, 2012
Page updated: January 27, 2012
Page reviewed: January 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external