Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 8—August 2006
Research

Macrolide Resistance in Adults with Bacteremic Pneumococcal Pneumonia

Joshua P. Metlay*†Comments to Author , Neil O. Fishman†, Marshall M. Joffe†, Michael J. Kallan†, Jesse L. Chittams†, and Paul H. Edelstein†
Author affiliations: *Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; †University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Patterns of prior antimicrobial drug exposure for patients and controls*

Antimicrobial agent exposure Macrolide resistant, n = 76 (%) Macrolide susceptible, n = 368 (%) OR 95% CI p value
Any in prior 6 mo† 34 (45) 101 (27) 2.2 1.3–3.7 0.002
Any macrolide in prior 6 mo 14 (19) 29 (8) 2.7 1.3–5.4 0.004
Any quinolone in prior 6 mo 14 (19) 33 (9) 2.3 1.2–4.6 0.013
Any penicillin in prior 6 mo 8 (11) 36 (10) 1.1 0.5–2.5 0.81
Any cephalosporin in prior 6 mo 4 (5) 15 (4) 1.3 0.4–4.1 0.62
Any tetracycline in prior 6 mo 1 (1) 3 (1) 1.6 0.2–16.1 0.66
No. antimicrobial agents in 6 mo
None 41 (55) 261 (71) Referent
1 prescription 18 (24) 75 (20) 1.5 0.8–2.7 0.20
>2 prescriptions 16 (21) 33 (9) 3.0 1.5–6.0 0.002
Did not complete last prescription 9 (12) 14 (4) 3.5 1.4–8.3 0.004
On antimicrobial agent at admission 4 (5) 7 (2) 2.9 0.8–10.2 0.083
Time since antimicrobial agent‡
No prior drug use 44 (59) 277 (75) Referent
<3 mo 22 (29) 62 (17) 2.2 1.2–4.2 0.006
4–6 mo 9 (12) 30 (8) 1.7 0.8–4.5 0.12

*Odds ratio (OR) and 95% binomial confidence interval (95% CI). P value based on χ2 test.
†Does not include antimicrobial agents that patient was taking at time of admission for bacteremic pneumococcal pneumonia.
‡For patients on >1 antimicrobial agent in previous 6 months, this represents time since most recent course of drugs.

Main Article

Page created: December 09, 2011
Page updated: December 09, 2011
Page reviewed: December 09, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external