Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 12, Number 8—August 2006

Research

Carbapenem Resistance in Klebsiella pneumoniae Not Detected by Automated Susceptibility Testing

Fred C. Tenover*Comments to Author , Rajinder K. Kalsi†, Portia P. Williams‡, Roberta B. Carey*, Sheila Stocker*, David Lonsway*, J. Kamile Rasheed*, James W. Biddle*, John E. McGowan‡, and Bruce Hanna†
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; †Bellevue Hospital, New York, New York, USA; ‡Rollins School of Public Heath, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Main Article

Table 2

Summary of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for 15 test isolates*

Method (software) Card/panel Imipenem results (n = 15)
Meropenem results (n = 15)
Resistant Intermediate Susceptible Resistant Intermediate Susceptible
Broth microdilution In-house frozen panel 13 2 0 14 1 0
Disk diffusion BDDS disks 3 11 1 10 5 0
MicroScan (LabPro1.51, Alert 1.50) Neg combo 32 7 7 1 13 1 1
Phoenix (4.05W/3.81A) NMIC/ ID-104 5 8 2 12 1 2
Sensititre AutoReader (3.0.8 SP2) GN2F 0 2 13 0 3 12
VITEK (R10.01) Superflex GNS 122 and 127 5 0 10 2 3 10
VITEK 2* (R04.01) GN07 4 6 5 4 4 5

*No meropenem interpretations were given by the Advanced Expert System for 2 organisms.

Main Article

TOP