Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 12, Number 9—September 2006
Dispatch

Japanese Encephalitis Outbreak, India, 2005

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
117
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: *Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior, India; †Air Force Hospital, Gorakhpur, India; ‡B.R.D. Medical College, Gorakhpur, India

Cite This Article

Abstract

An outbreak of viral encephalitis occurred in Gorakhpur, India, from July through November 2005. The etiologic agent was confirmed to be Japanese encephalitis virus by analyzing 326 acute-phase clinical specimens for virus-specific antibodies and viral RNA and by virus isolation. Phylogenetic analysis showed that these isolates belonged to genogroup 3.

An epidemic of viral encephalitis was reported from July through November 2005 in Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. It was the longest and most severe epidemic in 3 decades; 5,737 persons were affected in 7 districts of eastern Uttar Pradesh, and 1,344 persons died (1). Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) is the most common cause of childhood viral encephalitis in the world; it causes an estimated 50,000 cases and 10,000 deaths annually (2,3). JEV is endemic in the Gorakhpur and Basti divisions of eastern Uttar Pradesh. The geographic features of this region are conducive for the spread of JEV; an abundance of rice fields and a bowl-shaped landscape allow water to collect in pools. Heavy rains saturated the ground in 2005, which caused ideal breeding conditions for mosquitoes that transmit the virus from pigs to humans. In addition, high temperature and relative humidity provided a suitable environment for JEV transmission.

We report in-depth investigations of JEV-specific antibodies, virus isolation, and demonstration of viral RNA in 326 febrile patients with encephalitis symptoms who were admitted to B.R.D. Medical College, Gorakhpur. Further molecular epidemiologic studies were performed to establish the genetic relatedness of the viral strain associated with this epidemic.

The Study

A total of 326 clinical samples (185 blood and 141 cerebrospinal fluid [CSF]) were collected from the 326 patients who had a diagnosis of encephalitis. Two sets of blood samples, with and without anticoagulant, were collected for virus isolation and serologic tests. All serum and CSF samples were screened for JEV-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG by using an in-house dipstick ELISA that incorporated nitrocellulose as the solid phase. Purified viral antigen was obtained from culture supernatant of infected C6/36 cultures by sucrose density gradient ultra centrifugation (46). Results were confirmed by using an in-house IgM capture ELISA (7).

JE-specific RNA was detected by using the Access quick one-step reverse transcription (RT)–PCR kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) with the primer pairs JED3S: ATG CGC GGA TCC GAC AAA CTG GCC CTG AA (1839–1867) and JED3C: GGG GAA GCT TCG TGC TTC CAG CTT TGT CC (2193–2165) on the basis of the sequence in domain III of the E gene of strain JaOArS982 (8).

Virus isolation was attempted in C6/36 cells (4) from RT-PCR– and IgM-positive serum and CSF samples according to standard protocol (5). Double-stranded sequencing of domain III of the E gene of JEV was performed on an ABI 310 sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) with the BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing ready reaction kit. The phylogenetic tree was constructed with the neighbor-joining method with bootstrap analysis of 1,000 replicates with the MEGA version 2.1 program (9).

Rural populations between the ages of 3 months and 15 years were affected; almost 50% of children 6–10 years of age were affected, and 35% of children <5 years of age were affected. The epidemic affected boys and girls at a ratio of 1.9 to 1. The overall case-fatality ratio was 23%. Children dominated the case load because most adults in the area are immune to the virus. The trend of the epidemic showed that most cases were reported from the first to third weeks of October. Clinical history showed that all patients had fever (temperatures 38.5°C–40°C); prominent symptoms included severe headache, convulsions, and vomiting, leading to paralysis, coma, and death.

Analysis indicated an overall positivity of 50% of serum samples and 30% of CSF samples. The antibody profile of the serum samples showed 23% IgM, 19% IgG, and 7% both IgM and IgG positivity, compared with 26% IgM, 4% IgG, and 1% both IgM and IgG positivity in CSF samples. A total of 9% of CSF samples were positive for JEV-specific RNA (355-bp amplicon) as determined by RT-PCR. All these RT-PCR–positive CSF samples were also positive for IgM. None of the serum samples were positive by RT-PCR for viral RNA. Adding RT-PCR– and IgM-positive samples to C6/36 cells yielded 7 JEV isolates from IgM-positive CSF samples only, as confirmed by ELISA and RT-PCR. The antibody profile of the RT-PCR– and isolation-positive samples is depicted in Table 1.

Figure

Thumbnail of Sequence phylogeny based on partial E gene sequence of Japanese encephalitis virus isolates from the Gorakhpur epidemic, with reference to other Southeast Asian isolates. The tree was generated by neighbor-joining method. Each strain is abbreviated with the country of origin, followed by the year of isolation. Bootstrap values are indicated at the major branch points.

Figure. Sequence phylogeny based on partial E gene sequence of Japanese encephalitis virus isolates from the Gorakhpur epidemic, with reference to other Southeast Asian isolates. The tree was generated by neighbor-joining method....

Further analysis of a 355-nucleotide sequence in domain III of the E gene of these isolates showed >95% homology with JEV on BLAST search. On comparison with 24 other geographically diverse JEV isolates (Table 2), all JEV isolates sequenced in this study were closely related (>99% homology). The isolates from this outbreak showed a nucleotide sequence identity of 95.6% and 94.6% with prototype JEV (Nakayama strain) and the first Indian JEV (isolated from Vellore in 1956), respectively. The dendrogram showed that the JEV isolates responsible for the 2005 Gorakhpur epidemic belong to genogroup 3 (G3) but form a cluster separate from earlier Indian isolates (Figure).

Conclusions

The Gorakhpur district of Uttar Pradesh, which shares a border with Nepal and Bihar, has been experiencing periodic outbreaks of JEV since 1978. The virus cannot usually be isolated from clinical specimens, even with the best laboratory facilities, probably because of low levels of viremia and the rapid development of neutralizing antibodies. The diagnosis is therefore usually based on the presence of antibodies. The IgM capture ELISA for serum and CSF has become the accepted standard for diagnosing JEV.

The presence of only IgG antibodies in 19% of the patients indicated exposure to JEV infection in the past. This finding was expected because JEV is endemic to northern India, particularly Gorakhpur, and several large JEV epidemics have occurred in the past decade. In the present study, only 13 CSF samples (9%) were positive by RT-PCR. Seven virus isolates were obtained from IgM-positive CSF samples that did not yield RT-PCR amplicons before cultivation. Similar variations in virus detection and isolation have been reported (10,11); these findings underscore the sensitivity of cell culture systems for amplification of viable virus. Furthermore, the inability to detect genomic RNA or isolate virus from serum samples was striking and highlights the need for CSF sampling for both clinical diagnosis and epidemiologic studies.

We also investigated the molecular epidemiology of the outbreak by comparative sequence analysis of the isolates obtained in this study with reference strains of JEV. Domain III of the E gene was targeted for this purpose because this is the region under immune selective pressure, and it exhibits sufficiently rapid mutation to show evolutionary and epidemiologic relationships (1214). We determined the partial sequence of these isolates directly from clinical samples without risk of altering the genome by passage in vitro. The dendrogram showed that the G3 of JEV is still circulating in India. However, compared with isolates from 1956 to 1988, recent isolates form a separate cluster. Frequent introduction of new virus genotypes through bird migration has led to shifts in circulating genotypes in neighboring Asian countries, including Japan, Vietnam, China, Korea, Sri Lanka, and Malaysia (3,15). Therefore, detailed and continuous epidemiologic surveillance is warranted to monitor the incursion and spread of JEV genotypes in India, which will allow effective control and management strategies to be undertaken at the earliest opportunity.

Dr Parida is a senior scientist in the Division of Virology, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Gwalior. His main areas of research are molecular epidemiology and diagnostic virology as they pertain to arboviruses.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank the Defence Research and Development Organization, Ministry of Defence, India, for providing necessary facilities and financial aid for this study.

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. Outbreak encephalitis 2005: cases of Japanese encephalitis in Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. 2005. Core Programme Clusters. Communicable Diseases and Disease Surveillance. 2005 Oct 21 [cited 2006 Jul 11]. Available from http://w3.whosea.org/en/Section1226/Section2073.asp
  2. Monath TP, Heinz FX. Flaviviridae. In: Fields BN, Knipe DM, Howley PM, editors. Fields virology. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott–Raven; 1996. p. 961–1034.
  3. Solomon T, Ni H, Beasley DWC, Ekkelenkamp M, Cardosa MJ, Barret AD. Origin and evolution of Japanese encephalitis virus in Southeast Asia.J Virol. 2003;77:30918. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Igarashi A. Isolation of a Singh's Aedes albopictus cell clone sensitive to dengue and chikungunya viruses.J Gen Virol. 1978;40:53144. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Gould EA, Clegg JCS. Growth, titration and purification of togaviruses. In: Mahy BW, editor. Virology: a practical approach. Oxford: IRL Press; 1985. p. 43–78.
  6. Parida MM, Upadhyay C, Saxena P, Dash PK, Jana AM, Seth P. Evaluation of a dipstick ELISA and a rapid immunochromatographic test for diagnosis of dengue virus infection.Acta Virol. 2001;45:299304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Burke DS, Nisalak A, Ussery MA. Antibody capture immunoassay detection of Japanese encephalitis virus immunoglobulin M and G antibodies in cerebrospinal fluid.J Clin Microbiol. 1982;16:103442.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sumiyoshi H, Mori C, Fuke I, Morita K, Kuhara S, Kondou J, Complete nucleotide sequence of the Japanese encephalitis virus genome RNA.Virology. 1987;161:497510. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetic analysis software.Bioinformatics. 2001;17:12445. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Gajanana A, Thenmozhi V, Samuel PP, Rajendran R. An appraisal of some recent diagnostic assays for Japanese encephalitis.Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 1996;27:6738.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Kabilan L, Vrati S, Ramesh S, Srinivasan S, Appaiahgari MB, Arunachalam N, Japanese encephalitis virus is an important cause of encephalitis among children in Cuddalore district, Tamil Nadu, India.J Clin Virol. 2004;31:1539. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Paranjpe S, Banerjee K. Phylogenetic analysis of the envelope gene of Japanese encephalitis virus.Virus Res. 1996;42:10717. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Holbrook MR, Barrett ADT. Molecular epidemiology of Japanese encephalitis virus.Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 2002;267:7590. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rey FA, Heinz FX, Mandl C, Kunz C, Harrison SC. The envelope glycoprotein from tick borne encephalitis virus at 2 Å resolution.Nature. 1995;375:2918. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nga PT, Parquet MC, Cuong VD, Ma SP, Hasebe F, Inoue S, Shift in Japanese encephalitis virus (JEV) genotype circulating in northern Vietnam: implications for frequent introductions of JEV from Southeast Asia to East Asia.J Gen Virol. 2004;85:162531. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1209.060200

Table of Contents – Volume 12, Number 9—September 2006

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Manmohan M. Parida, Division of Virology, Defence Research and Development Establishment, Jhansi Road, Gwalior, 474002 MP, India

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 18, 2011
Page updated: November 18, 2011
Page reviewed: November 18, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external