Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 14, Number 2—February 2008
Research

Cost-effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination in the United States

Harrell W. Chesson*Comments to Author , Donatus U. Ekwueme*, Mona Saraiya*, and Lauri E. Markowitz*
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA;

Main Article

Table 3

Multiway sensitivity analyses: estimated cost per QALY gained by adding routine vaccination of 12-y-old girls to existing cervical cancer screening in the United States*†

Parameter or parameter set varied Cost per QALY gained
Excluding anal, vaginal, vulvar cancers, $US. Including anal, vaginal, vulvar cancers, $US
Higher cost per case and larger reduction in quality of life for all HPV-related health outcomes 4,606 3,262
Lower cost per case and smaller reduction in quality of life for all HPV-related health outcomes 21,779 17,825
Discount rate = 0%; time horizon = 100 y 675 <0
Discount rate = 5%; time horizon = 50 y 36,503 34,539
Higher percentage of health outcomes attributable to HPV vaccine types; higher incidence of HPV-related health outcomes 3,815 1,882
Lower percentage of health outcomes attributable to HPV vaccine types; lower incidence of HPV-related health outcomes 24,250 20,265
All variables above (best-case scenario) <0 <0
All variables above (worst-case scenario) 122,976 115,896

*When key parameter values were simultaneously varied in the population model of quadrivalent HPV vaccine (excluding herd immunity). QALY, quality-adjusted life year; HPV, human papillomavirus;
†The lower and upper bound ranges were the same as described in the1-way sensitivity analyses, except for the time horizon, which was varied from 50 y to 100 y.

Main Article

Page created: July 21, 2010
Page updated: July 21, 2010
Page reviewed: July 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external