Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 14, Number 2—February 2008

Dispatch

Experimental Infection and Natural Contact Exposure of Dogs with Avian Influenza Virus (H5N1)

Matthias Giese*, Timm C. Harder*, Jens P. Teifke*, Robert Klopfleisch*, Angele Breithaupt*, Thomas C. Mettenleiter*, and Thomas W. Vahlenkamp*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany;

Main Article

Table

Course of experimental influenza virus (H5N1) infection of dogs and in-contact animals*

Dog no. EID50 Body temperature (dpi)
Pharyngeal swab (dpi)
Euthanized
(dpi) Antibodies
0 2 4 6 0 2 4 6 HI ELISA
1 106 38.5 39.2 38.8 38.8 + 10 (+)†
2 106 38.4 39.7 39.1 38.8 + 10 (+)‡
3 106 38.5 39.3 38.6 38.4 + 21 16 +
4 106 38.7 39.3 39.1 38.6 21
5 (dog contact) 0 38.3 38.4 38.0 38.7 21
6 (cat contact) 0 38.4 38.2 38.4 38.5 21
7 (cat contact) 0 38.3 38.5 38.6 38.8 21
8 (cat contact) 0 38.4 38.5 38.2 38.3 21
9 (neg. control) 0 38.4 38.2 38.7 37.8 21
10 (neg. control) 0 38.3 38.6 38.8 38.0 21

*Elevated body temperatures (above 39°C) are underlined. Real time reverse transcription–PCR results are given as – (cycle threshold [ct] values >38) and + (ct values 31–38). Animal serum samples were examined by hemagglutination-inhibition (HI) using highly pathogenic influenza virus (H5N1) strain A/cat/Germany/R606/2006 (9) as antigen. Results are given as reciprocal titers. Competitive nucleoprotein ELISA results are given as – (inhibition <65%) and + (inhibition >65); EID50, 50% egg infectious dose; dpi, days postinfection.
†Serum from dog no. 1 on dpi 10 showed 39.4% inhibition.
‡Serum from dog no. 2 showed 21.6% inhibition.

Main Article

TOP