Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 11—November 2009
Perspective

Risk of Importing Zoonotic Diseases through Wildlife Trade, United States

Boris I. PavlinComments to Author , Lisa M. Schloegel, and Peter Daszak
Author affiliations: World Health Organization, Palikir, Federated States of Micronesia (B.I. Pavlin); Wildlife Trust, New York, New York, USA (L.M. Schloegel, P. Daszak)

Main Article

Table 3

Mammal genera capable of harboring the greatest number of risk zoonoses*

Genus (common name) No. (%) risk zoonoses
Canis (dogs) 14 (52)
Felis (cats) 14 (52)
Rattus (rats) 13 (48)
Equus (horses) 11 (41)
Macaca (macaques) 10 (37)
Lepus (rabbits and hares) 10 (37)
Ovis (sheep) 9 (33)
Vulpes (foxes) 9 (33)

*Risk zoonoses, relevant zoonotic diseases at risk for importation into the United States; n = 27.

Main Article

Page created: December 09, 2010
Page updated: December 09, 2010
Page reviewed: December 09, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external