Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 12—December 2009
Dispatch

Dobrava-Belgrade Virus Spillover Infections, Germany

Author affiliations: Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut–Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany (M. Schlegel, T. Büchner, M.H. Groschup, A. Balkema-Buschmann, R.G. Ulrich); Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany (B. Klempa, B. Auste, D.H. Krüger); Institute of Slovak Academy of Science, Bratislava, Slovakia (B. Klempa); Landesforstanstalt Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, Schwerin, Germany (M. Bemmann); Bernhard-Nocht-Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany (J. Schmidt-Chanasit); University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany (M. Meier); University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany (H. Zoller)

Cite This Article

Abstract

We present the molecular identification of Apodemus agrarius (striped field mouse) as reservoir host of the Dobrava-Belgrade virus (DOBV) lineage DOBV-Aa in 3 federal states of Germany. Phylogenetic analyses provided evidence for multiple spillover of DOBV-Aa to A. flavicollis, a crucial prerequisite for host switch and genetic reassortment.

European hantaviruses are emerging viruses that can cause hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome (HFRS) of differing severities. Dobrava-Belgrade virus (DOBV) is a hantavirus that appears in 3 distinct lineages hosted by different Apodemus species. The DOBV-Af lineage associated with the yellow-necked mouse (A. flavicollis) has caused serious HFRS in southeast Europe with a case-fatality rate <12% (1,2). Human infections with Caucasian wood mouse (A. ponticus)–associated DOBV-Ap have resulted in more moderate than severe HFRS in the southern part of European Russia (3). Mild-to-moderate human DOBV disease in central and eastern Europe has been connected with infection by DOBV-Aa lineage carried by the striped field mouse (A. agrarius) (35). Other A. agarius–associated strains, found in Estonia and called Saaremaa virus, have been proposed to form a distinct hantavirus species (6). In Germany, human DOBV cases with mild to moderate clinical outcomes have been detected by serologic investigations (4,7) but only 1 short DOBV-Aa small (S) segment sequence derived from a patient in northern Germany has been identified (8). The natural host and the geographic distribution of DOBV in its reservoir host has remained unknown in Germany.

The Study

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Seroprevalence of Dobrava-Belgrade virus (DOBV) in Apodemus agrarius mice within 3 federal states of Germany, central Europe. A) Location of the study area (box). B) Locations of the study sites. WG, Lüneburg district, Lower Saxony (LS); Pe1 and Pe3, Güstrow district; H, Nordvorpommern district, K/A1, Demmin district, all Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania (MWP); To and Ka, Ostprignitz-Ruppin district, Brandenburg (BB). For each trapping site, the rate of seroreactive A. agrarius mice is

Figure 1. Seroprevalence of Dobrava-Belgrade virus (DOBV) in Apodemus agrarius mice within 3 federal states of Germany, central Europe. A) Location of the study area (box). B) Locations of the study sites. WG,...

During 2002 through 2008, a total of 366 Apodemus mice were trapped at 7 different sites in Germany (Figure 1). Serologic screening of transudates collected from these rodents by using an in-house DOBV immunoglobulin (Ig) G-ELISA, with a yeast-expressed nucleocapsid protein of DOBV-Af as antigen, identified 16 reactive and 5 equivocal samples of 114 A. agrarius trapped at 7 trapping sites in 3 federal states of Germany (Figure 1; Technical Appendix). Additionally, of 237 A. flavicollis mice, 1 equivocal sample and 4 DOBV-reactive samples were detected at 4 trapping sites (Figure 1; Technical Appendix). In contrast, of 15 wood mice (A. sylvaticus) originating from 3 trapping sites, none were found to be DOBV-seroreactive. A subsequent focus-reduction neutralization test showed a higher endpoint titer with DOBV-Aa than DOBV-Af (Technical Appendix) for 6 of the 8 investigated transudates independently, whether originating from A. agrarius or A. flavicollis.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees of Dobrava-Belgrade virus (DOBV) based on partial small (S) segment nucleotide sequences of 559 nt (position 377–935) (A) and complete nucleocapsid protein coding nucleotide sequences (S segment open reading frame) (B). The ML trees (Tamura-Nei evolutionary model) were calculated using TREE-PUZZLE package (www.tree-puzzle.de). Scale bars indicate an evolutionary distance of 0.1 substitutions per position in the sequence. Values above the br

Figure 2. Maximum-likelihood (ML) phylogenetic trees of Dobrava-Belgrade virus (DOBV) based on partial small (S) segment nucleotide sequences of 559 nt (position 377–935) (A) and complete nucleocapsid protein coding nucleotide sequences (S segment...

An initial screening by a large (L) segment–specific nested reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) (3) of 67 lung samples, representing all seroreactive (n = 20) and equivocal (n = 6) as well as 36 selected seronegative and 5 serologically not-analyzed animals, showed a 390-nt amplification product for 21 samples representing 16 seroreactive, 4 seronegative, and 1 serologically not-investigated animals (Technical Appendix). To enable a comparison with the only available DOBV sequence from Germany (H169), an S segment portion of 559 nt was amplified by RT-PCR from 11 lung tissues (Technical Appendix). In the phylogenetic analyses, all sequences from Germany formed 1 well-supported (PUZZLE [www.tree-puzzle.de]) and bootstrap support values >90%) monophyletic group consisting of 2 clusters. The first cluster contained S segment sequences from district Güstrow (trapping sites Pe1 and Pe3), Lüneburg (trapping site WG), Nordvorpommern (trapping site H), and the previously published DOBV sequence from an HFRS patient from northern Germany (H169; [8]; Figure 2, panel A). A second cluster was formed by S segment sequences originating from districts Ostprignitz-Ruppin (trapping sites Ka, To) and Demmin (trapping site K/A1). Notably, the A. flavicollis–derived sequences from sites Pe1, H, Ka, and K/A1 clustered together or were completely identical with A. agrarius–derived sequences from the same or neighboring trapping sites, suggesting multiple spillover infections (Figure 2, panel A, Technical Appendix Table 1).

The sequences from Germany share a common ancestor with the DOBV-Aa sequences originating from Slovakia and Russia. Together, they form a monophyletic group (DOBV-Aa lineage) that is clearly separated from A. flavicollis–borne (DOBV-Af) and A. ponticus–borne (DOBV-Ap) sequences and from A. agrarius–borne Saaremaa virus sequences. Subsequent analysis of nucleotide sequences of the entire nucleocapsid (N) protein– and glycoprotein precursor (GPC)–encoding regions confirmed these findings (Figure 2, panel B; Technical Appendix). A pairwise comparison between nucleotide and amino acid sequences of the complete N and GPC open reading frames from the novel German DOBV strains showed divergences of 1.5%–8.8% (0.3%–1.4%) and 2.1%–8.3% (0.8%–1.8%), respectively (Technical Appendix Table 2). The highest identity values on the nucleotide and amino acid sequence level (91.2%–91.7% and 99%–99.7%) were found for an S segment sequence from Denmark (Lolland/1403; GenBank accession no. AJ616854; Technical Appendix). The nucleotide and amino acid sequence divergence to other DOBV sequences was much higher, reaching 10.1%–14.3% (1%–3.3%) and 12.6%–20.7% (2.9%–9.4%), respectively.

Morphologic species determination for all DOBV-seroreactive and RT-PCR–positive rodents was confirmed by a mitochondrial cytochrome b gene-specific PCR (9,10), sequence determination, and comparison with available GenBank sequences from A. agrarius and A. flavicollis (Technical Appendix Table 1).

Conclusions

Based on a large panel of the entire N- and GPC-encoding DOBV sequences, we report direct molecular evidence that DOBV in Germany is represented by a genetic lineage associated with A. agrarius (DOBV-Aa). In contrast, we found no evidence for the occurrence of DOBV-Af in A. flavicollis or other Apodemus species from Germany. Consistent with the geographic distribution of A. agrarius (11) and the report of human DOBV disease exclusively in northern and northeastern Germany, this finding may confirm DOBV-Aa as the sole causative agent of DOBV infections in Germany (4; Robert Koch-Institut, SurvStat, www.rki.de).

Previously A. agrarius–associated Saaremaa virus was experimentally shown to be able to infect A. agrarius and A. flavicollis mice (12). We report multiple natural spillover infections of A. flavicollis by a DOBV strain originally hosted by A. agrarius. The observed spillover infections represent a crucial prerequisite for genetic reassortment. This observation is in contrast to other reports from Slovenia and Slovakia where, although A. agrarius and A. flavicollis are occurring sympatrically, A. flavicollis is exclusively carrying the DOBV-Af and A. agrarius the DOBV-Aa lineage (4,13). In contrast to our observations, single DOBV-Af spillover infections of A. sylvaticus and Mus musculus have been reported previously (14).

The phylogenetic analyses demonstrated 2 well-separated clusters within the DOBV-Aa lineage. These rodent-derived DOBV sequences in Germany represent a major contribution to the DOBV genomics and phylogenetics. Future investigations should help to identify specific features of these DOBV-Aa strains resulting in its frequent spillover to A. flavicollis and to prove a putative adaptation of DOBV-Aa on A. flavicollis after spillover, as well as possible reassortment processes.

Mr Schlegel is a doctoral student at the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut. His research interests are the ecology, molecular evolution, and pathogenesis of rodent-borne viruses.

Top

Acknowledgments

We kindly acknowledge the support of the various partners in the network “Rodent-borne pathogens,” additional collaborators from different parts of Germany, and Dörte Kaufmann, Daniel Balkema, and Heike Lerch.

This work was supported by the Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz, grant number 07HS027 (to R.G.U.); by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, grant no. KR 1293/9-1 (to D.H.K.); by the Slovak Scientific Grant Agency VEGA, grant number 2/0189/09 (to B.K.), by the Förderverein of the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (to M.S.), and by the Paul und Ursula Klein-Stiftung (to J.S.C.).

Top

References

  1. Avsic-Zupanc  T, Petrovec  M, Furlan  P, Kaps  R, Elgh  F, Lundkvist  A. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in the Dolenjska region of Slovenia–a 10-year survey. Clin Infect Dis. 1999;28:8605. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Krüger  DH, Ulrich  R, Lundkvist  Å. Hantavirus infections and their prevention. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:112944. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Klempa  B, Tkachenko  EA, Dzagurova  TK, Yunicheva  YV, Morozov  VG, Okulova  NM, Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome caused by 2 lineages of Dobrava hantavirus, Russia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:61725. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Sibold  C, Ulrich  R, Labuda  M, Lundkvist  Å, Martens  H, Schütt  M, Dobrava hantavirus causes hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome in central Europe and is carried by two different Apodemus mice species. J Med Virol. 2001;63:15867. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Klempa  B, Stanko  M, Labuda  M, Ulrich  R, Meisel  H, Krüger  DH. Central European Dobrava hantavirus isolate from striped field mouse, Apodemus agrarius. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:275663. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sjölander  KB, Golovljova  I, Vasilenko  V, Plyusnin  A, Lundkvist  A. Serological divergence of Dobrava and Saaremaa hantaviruses: evidence for two distinct serotypes. Epidemiol Infect. 2002;128:99103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Meisel  H, Lundkvist  Å, Gantzer  K, Bär  W, Sibold  C, Krüger  DH. First case of infection with hantavirus Dobrava in Germany. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1998;17:8845. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Klempa  B, Schütt  M, Auste  B, Ulrich  R, Meisel  H, Krüger  DH. First molecular identification of human Dobrava virus infection in Central Europe. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:13225. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Essbauer  S, Schmidt  J, Conraths  FJ, Friedrich  R, Koch  J, Hautmann  W, A new Puumala hantavirus subtype in rodents associated with an outbreak of nephropathia epidemica in South-East Germany in 2004. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:133344. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Kocher  TD, Thomas  WK, Meyer  A, Edwards  SV, Pääbo  S, Villablan  CA, Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: Amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989;86:6196200. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Mitchell-Jones  AJ, Amori  G, Bogdanowicz  W, Krystufek  B, Reijnders  PJH, Spitzenberger  F, The atlas of European mammals. London: Academic Press; 1999.
  12. Klingström  J, Heyman  P, Escutenaire  S, Sjölander  KB, De Jaegere  F, Henttonen  H, Rodent host specificity of European hantaviruses: evidence of Puumala virus interspecific spillover. J Med Virol. 2002;68:5818. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Avsic-Zupanc  T, Nemirov  K, Petrovec  M, Trilar  T, Poljak  M, Vaheri  A, Genetic analysis of wild-type Dobrava hantavirus in Slovenia: co-existence of two distinct genetic lineages within the same natural focus. J Gen Virol. 2000;81:174755.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Weidmann  M, Schmidt  P, Vackova  M, Krivanec  K, Munclinger  P, Hufert  FT. Identification of genetic evidence for Dobrava virus spillover in rodents by nested reverse transcription (RT)-PCR and TaqMan RT-PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:80812. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Martin  DP, Williamson  C, Posada  D. RDP2: recombination detection and analysis from sequence alignments. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:2602. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1512.090923

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Table of Contents – Volume 15, Number 12—December 2009

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Rainer G. Ulrich, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Office International des Epizooties, Collaborating Centre for Zoonoses in Europe, Institute for Novel and Emerging Infectious Diseases, Südufer 10, D-17493 Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 09, 2010
Page updated: December 09, 2010
Page reviewed: December 09, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external