Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 15, Number 3—March 2009
Dispatch

Epidemiology of Bluetongue Virus Serotype 8, Germany

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
85
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Wusterhausen, Germany (F.J. Conraths, J.M. Gethmann, C. Staubach); Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald-Insel Riems, Germany (T.C. Mettenleiter, M. Beer, B. Hoffmann)

Cite This Article

Abstract

In Germany, bluetongue disease had not been reported before 2006. During August 2006–August 2008, >24,000 bluetongue virus serotype 8 infections were reported, most (20,635) in 2007. In 2006 and 2007, respectively, case-fatality rates were 6.4% and 13.1% for cattle and 37.5% and 41.5% for sheep. Vaccination in 2008 decreased cases.

Bluetongue disease (BT) is an infectious, but noncontagious, viral infection of ruminants that is transmitted by Culicoides spp. biting midges. It can cause massive losses in farmed ruminants, particularly sheep. BT had never been reported in Europe north of the Alps before August 2006, when outbreaks almost simultaneously occurred in Belgium, France, Germany, and the Netherlands (14). We examined the epidemiology of this outbreak in Germany, where reporting of BT cases through the national animal disease notification system (5) is mandatory. In this article, an outbreak is defined as the occurrence of BT in cattle, sheep, or goats on a farm involving at least 1 infected animal; a case is defined as a single infected animal. Wild ruminants infected with BT were always considered cases.

The Study

In Germany, cattle were tested for BTV before trade or if disease was suspected from clinical signs. Diagnoses were made by serologic testing with commercial test kits (Pourquier ELISA Bluetongue Serum, Institut Pourquier, Montpellier, France; Bluetongue Virus Antibody Test Kit, VMRD, Pullman, WA, USA; ID Screen Blue Tongue Competition ELISA Kit, ID Vet, Montpellier, France; INGEZIM BTV, INGENASA, Madrid, Spain) or real-time reverse transcription–PCR (RT-PCR) (6).

Because no real-time RT-PCR for the sensitive detection of BTV serotype 8 (BTV-8) was available in Europe in 2006, we developed and validated such an assay. For the detection of BTV-8 genome, 0.8-µM primers (BTV8-NS1-1F [5′-AAT GGG ATG TGT GTC AAA CAA AAT-3′]; BTV8-NS1-1R [5′-CAA CTA ATT TAT ACG CTT TCG CC-3′]) and a 0.2-µM probe (BTV8-NS1-1FAM [5′-FAM-CTC CTC CGC ATC GGT CGC CGC-TAMRA-3′]) were used in a QuantiTect Probe RT-PCR kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The method was then transferred to and implemented at the regional laboratories of the German federal states responsible for BT screening; the results were confirmed by proficiency testing. Since the summer of 2007, real-time RT-PCR assays for all known 24 serotypes of BTV (3) have also been used for BTV genome detection. Samples with inconclusive results in the differential pan-BTV and BTV-8 tests were referred to the national reference laboratory, which confirmed the exclusive presence of BTV-8 during the study period (August 2006–August 2008).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Maps showing outbreaks of bluetongue disease among all affected species in Germany in A) 2006, B) 2007, and C) 2008 (through August 31). Red dots indicate confirmed cases/outbreaks.

Figure 1. Maps showing outbreaks of bluetongue disease among all affected species in Germany in A) 2006, B) 2007, and C) 2008 (through August 31). Red dots indicate confirmed cases/outbreaks.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Number of new cases/outbreaks of bluetongue disease per calendar week in cattle (red), sheep (white), and goats (black), Germany.

Figure 2. Number of new cases/outbreaks of bluetongue disease per calendar week in cattle (red), sheep (white), and goats (black), Germany.

In 2006, the disease was diagnosed on 571 cattle farms and in 309 sheep flocks, 3 other bovines, 6 red deer, 3 mouflons, and 1 roe deer in the federal states of North Rhine-Westphalia, Rhineland-Palatinate, Hesse, Lower Saxony, and Saarland (Figure 1, panel A). The core region of the epidemic in Germany was in North Rhine-Westphalia, adjacent to the affected areas in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. The disease was first detected in late August in calendar week 34 (37 cases), peaked mid October in calendar week 42 (154 cases), and decreased slowly until the end of the year (Figure 2). Apparently, the infection overwintered in the region (6) and flared up again in 2007, spreading over most of Germany during the summer and autumn of 2007 and resulting in 20,624 new outbreaks (Figure 1, panel B). During 2007, BT was detected on 12,638 cattle farms and in 23 other individual bovines, 7,790 sheep flocks, 115 goat herds, 34 fallow deer, 11 mouflons, 10 red deer, and 3 roe deer. The first case of 2007 was detected in early June, calendar week 23. The number of new cases started to rise constantly from the end of July (week 30), peaked at 3,001 new cases in mid September (week 37), and subsequently decreased slowly until the end of year. The number of affected animals was higher for sheep in the first months of the BT season in 2007; the number of affected cattle dominated the late phase (Figure 2).

In 2006, at least 48,364 cattle, 9,781 sheep, and 56 goats were exposed to BTV on affected premises (Table). Of these animals, 1,131 cattle (2.34%) and 590 sheep (6.03%) were found to be infected; 72 cattle and 221 sheep died. The case-fatality rate was much higher for sheep (37.5%) than for cattle (6.4%). These calculations are based on the assumption that all BT cases were reported. Because the infections caused only mild disease or remained even clinically inapparent in some animals, especially cattle, underreporting is likely and the case-fatality rate in cattle may be slightly overestimated.

In 2007, due to the spread of the disease, the exposed population rose to at least 1,317,111 cattle, 503,282 sheep, and 3,346 goats on affected farms. The numbers of infected animals on these farms amounted to 26,772 cattle, 32,116 sheep, and 209 goats in 20,624 new outbreaks. While mortality rates remained relatively low, as in 2006, the case-fatality proportion rose to 13.1% in cattle and 41.5% in sheep.

In 2008, BT incidence decreased considerably under the influence of a mass vaccination campaign that started in May and June 2008 (Figure 2), before the 2008 vector season. In 2008, a total of 1,070 new cases (PCR-positive, sampled after May 1, 2008; i.e., infection was acquired during the current transmission season) were reported. They were found mainly in 2 regions in northwestern Lower Saxony and western Baden-Württemberg (Figure 1, panel C), where the vaccination campaign started relatively late because of an initially limited supply of BTV-8-vaccine.

Conclusions

The number of BTV-8 infections in Germany that peaked during the summer and autumn of 2007 showed that even a limited BTV-8 outbreak can dramatically spread within a few months after detection of the first cases. After the initial incursion and limited spread in 2006, BTV-8 overwintered, resulting in efficient spread of BTV-8 during 2007 and severe consequences for cattle and sheep farmers. The case-fatality rate was ≈3× higher for sheep than for cattle (37.5% vs. 6.4% in 2006 and 41.5% vs. 13.1% in 2007). These findings illustrate that BTV-8 was more pathogenic for sheep than for cattle. It must be stressed, however, that the virus caused clinical disease and death in cattle, although other serotypes cause clinical disease and deaths primarily in sheep.

As a result of the vaccination campaign, the number of new cases reported in 2008 (through August 2008) was substantially lower than in 2007, demonstrating that convalescent animals are protected from reinfection and that vaccination was successful. In addition, restriction of animal movement from protection and surveillance zones appears reasonable, although the ability of restricted movement to decrease virus spread is limited, particularly during the vector season.

Dr Conraths is a veterinarian and head of the Institute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, in Wusterhausen, Germany. His research interests focus on the epidemiology of animal diseases and zoonoses.

Top

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Kathrin Teske, Doris Kämer, and Detlef Klöß for data management.

The study was supported by the German Federal Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Consumer Protection.

Top

References

  1. Thiry  E, Saegerman  C, Guyot  H, Kirten  P, Losson  B, Rollin  F, Bluetongue in northern Europe. Vet Rec. 2006;159:327.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Elbers  A, Backx  A, van der Spek  A, Ekker  M, Leijs  P, Steijn  K, Epidemiology of bluetongue virus serotype 8 outbreaks in the Netherlands in 2006 [in Dutch]. Tijdschr Diergeneeskd. 2008;133:2229.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Toussaint  JF, Sailleau  C, Mast  J, Houdart  P, Czaplicki  G, Demeestere  L, Bluetongue in Belgium, 2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:6146.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Saegerman  C, Berkvens  D, Mellor  PS. Bluetongue epidemiology in the European Union. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:53944. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Kroschewski  K, Kramer  M, Micklich  A, Staubach  C, Carmanns  R, Conraths  FJ. Animal disease outbreak control: the use of crisis management tools. Rev Sci Tech. 2006;25:21121.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hoffmann  B, Sasserath  M, Thalheim  S, Bunzenthal  C, Strebelow  G, Beer  M. Bluetongue virus serotype 8 reemergence in Germany, 2007 and 2008. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:14213. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1503.081210

Table of Contents – Volume 15, Number 3—March 2009

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Franz J. Conraths, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Federal Research Institute for Animal Health, Institute of Epidemiology, Seestrasse 55, 16868 Wusterhausen, Germany

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: December 07, 2010
Page updated: December 07, 2010
Page reviewed: December 07, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external