Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 16, Number 10—October 2010
Letter

Healthcare Worker Acceptance of Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 Vaccination, Morocco

Cite This Article

To the Editor: In Morocco, the first case of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 was diagnosed on June 12, 2009 (1). Because a main determinant of public immunization success is healthcare workers’ support and recommendations and because little is known about such with regard to pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccination in Morocco, our aim was to document healthcare workers’ knowledge, attitudes, practices, and acceptance of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 vaccination in Morocco.

From January 15 through February 28, 2010, a structured, self-administered, anonymous questionnaire was distributed to a convenience sample of 1,332 healthcare workers in 5 public hospitals in Rabat, Morocco. Completed questionnaires were analyzed by using SPSS version 10.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). The 1,002 responses gave a response rate of 75% (≈17% of the entire staff of the University Hospital of Rabat).

We found that the hospital staff had acquired basic knowledge about transmission and prevention of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus. Responses indicated that 218 (22%) study participants had accepted vaccination (i.e., had been vaccinated) against this virus. Markedly more healthcare workers in Morocco were undervaccinated than were those in the United States; by mid-January 2010, estimated vaccination coverage among healthcare workers was 37.1% (2). Some evidence indicates that willingness of healthcare workers to be vaccinated with the new vaccine is poor: 48.0% in Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China (3) and 22.3% in the United States (4). Vaccination coverage was significantly higher for those 20–30 years of age than for those in other age groups (p = 0.001). The analysis by occupational category showed significantly higher coverage for paramedical staff (26%) than for physicians and pharmacists (19%) (p<0.01). The main causes for this reluctance were fear of adverse effects, concerns about the new adjuvant used, the short duration of clinical trials, and influence of the media.

The low acceptance rate of vaccination for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 among healthcare workers in Morocco is alarming because they serve as an example for their patients and the public. Vaccination is needed to keep the healthcare system operating at maximum capacity during a pandemic. The following factors appear to play a major role in acceptance: accessibility of the vaccine within the service; free vaccine; and a display explaining vaccination’s benefits, protective value, and risk for adverse effects (5,6). Policy makers could use our findings to improve the vaccination strategy for healthcare workers in future vaccination campaigns.

Top

Rida TagajdidComments to Author , Hicham El Annaz, Taoufik Doblali, Kawtar Sefiani, Bouchra Belfquih, and Saad Mrani
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital, Rabat, Morocco (R. Tagajdid, H. El Annaz, B. Belfquih, S. Mrani); Mohammed V-Souissi University, Rabat (R. Tagajdid, H. El Annaz, T. Doblali, K. Sefiani, B. Belfquih, S. Mrani)

Top

References

  1. World Health Organization. World now at the start of 2009 influenza pandemic [cited 2009 Dec 7]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/index.html
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Interim results: influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent and seasonal influenza vaccination coverage among health-care personnel—United States, August 2009–January 2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2010;59:35762.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chor  JS, Ngai  KL, Wong  MC, Wong  SY, Lee  N, Leung  TF, Willingness of Hong Kong healthcare workers to accept pre-pandemic influenza vaccination at different WHO alert levels: two questionnaire surveys. BMJ. 2009;339:b3391. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Use of influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccine: recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), 2009. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2009;58:18.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jordan  R, Hayward  A. Should healthcare workers have the swine flu vaccine? BMJ. 2009;339:b3398. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lautenbach  E, Saint  S, Henderson  DK, Harris  DA. Initial response of health care institutions to emergence of H1N1 influenza: experiences, obstacles, and perceived future needs. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50:5237. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1610.100984

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 16, Number 10—October 2010

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Rida Tagajdid, Military Hospital of Rabat, Virology, Hay Riad, Rabat 10100, Morocco

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: September 08, 2011
Page updated: September 08, 2011
Page reviewed: September 08, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external