Volume 16, Number 8—August 2010
Novel Chlamydia-like Organisms as Cause of Bovine Abortions, UK
To the Editor: Despite the worldwide economic impact of, and welfare issues associated with, infectious bovine abortifacients, as well as potential zoonotic threats to human health, accurate diagnosis of the causes of abortion is uncommon (1). This poor diagnosis could be explained in part by the lack of identification of infectious abortifacient agents.
Although Chlamydophila abortus is a known etiologic agent of ruminant abortion, several novel species of Chlamydia-like organisms have recently emerged as putative ruminant abortifacients. Waddlia chondrophila was isolated from the brain and nervous tissue of an aborted bovine fetus in Germany (2), and Parachlamydia acanthamoebae and other unidentified Chlamydia-like species were identified in 18.3% of bovine placenta samples in Switzerland (3,4). Given the paucity of information about the causes of infectious bovine abortion and the high prevalence of Chlamydia-like organisms in the samples from Switzerland, we attempted to determine whether such organisms can be detected in bovine fetal tissues in the United Kingdom.
Pooled tissue samples comprising brain, heart, and/or placenta (depending on availability) were obtained from bovine fetuses submitted for diagnosis to the Scottish Agricultural College Disease Surveillance Centre, Dumfries, Scotland, UK, during 2008. Tissue pools were homogenized by using a Precellys bead mill homogenizer (Bertin Technologies, Ann Arbor, MI, USA), and DNA was extracted by using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega, Southampton, UK) according to manufacturer’s instructions. A pan-Chlamydiales PCR for the 16S rDNA sequence was performed by using forward primer 16S FOR2 (5′-CGT GGA TGA GGC ATG CAA GTC GA-3′) and reverse primer 16S REV2 (5′-CAA TCT CTC AAT CCG CCT AGA CGT CTT AG-3′) to generate amplicons of ≈260 bp (5). Negative-control reactions contained DNA-free water instead of extracted DNA. PCR products were purified (QIAquick PCR Purification Kit; QIAGEN, Crawley, UK) before direct sequencing by using the PCR primers and dideoxy chain termination/cycle sequencing on an ABI 3730XL DNA sequencer (MWG Operon, Ebersberg, Germany).
After the initial PCR, 22 (26.5%) of the 83 fetal samples tested were Chlamydiales positive. Serologic, bacteriologic, and histopathologic examination of fetal tissues identified no other infectious abortifacient agents in the Chlamydiales-positive samples. Sequence information was successfully obtained for 15 of these 22 samples with forward and reverse primers; sequences ranged from 140 bp to 194 bp (European Molecular Biology Laboratory/GenBank accession nos. GQ919016–GQ919030). These 15 short sequences were carefully aligned to a representative set of 22 similar Chlamydiales 16S rDNA sequences, identified by a BLAST (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST) similarity search of the European Molecular Biology Laboratory/GenBank database, plus alignment of an outgroup of 7 non-Chlamydiales sequences. A Bayesian phylogenetic tree (Markov Chain Monte Carlo settings: 2 runs of 625,000 generations; burn-in of 125,000 generations; trees sampled every 100 generations) was then estimated with a general time reversible + Γ nucleotide substitution model by using the MrBayes program (6) launched from the TOPALi v2 package (7).
Despite the short sequence length of the 15 samples, the tree was well resolved with the Chlamydiales sequences and formed 3 clusters (Chlamydiaceae, Rhabdochlamydiaceae/Simkaniaceae, and Parachlamydiaceae/Waddliaceae/Criblamydiaceae) (Figure). Two of these sequence clusters represented 10 and 5 of the samples, whereas no samples were represented in the cluster containing the Chlamydiaceae, which includes C. abortus. Most (10/15) sequences were found in the cluster containing the Parachlamydiaceae. This finding agrees with those of the aborted bovine placenta studies in Switzerland (3,4) and provides further evidence that Parachlamydia-like species may play a substantial role in bovine abortion in mainland Europe and the United Kingdom. Four of the remaining 5 samples clustered with members of the family Rhabdochlamydiaceae; the fifth sequence (CLBUK3), although present in the same Rhabdochlamydiaceae/Simkaniaceae cluster, appeared to be more distinct from other family members.
The identification of these organisms in such a large percentage of the bovine fetal tissue samples tested may indicate a role for these organisms in undiagnosed bovine abortions in the United Kingdom and Europe and may be a zoonotic source of infection for humans. Indeed, considerable evidence supports a role for Parachlamydia spp. in human pneumonia, whereas Rhabdochlamydia spp. is a suspected cause (8). In addition, evidence suggests that P. acanthamoebae crosses the human placenta to the unborn fetus (9). Also, the presence of both parachlamydial and rhabdochlamydial DNA in the lung secretions of hospitalized premature human neonates recently correlated with increased medical interventions and increased duration of hospital stay (10).
We demonstrate the presence of Parachlamydiaceae and Rhabdochlamydiaceae species in bovine abortions in the United Kingdom. Given the zoonotic potential and the economic and welfare impacts of bovine abortion on the agricultural sector, further studies are required to understand the incidence and pathogenic roles of these organisms in both humans and animals. These studies should include broader molecular epidemiologic studies, as well as detailed histologic/immunohistochemical investigations and organism recovery through culture of infected placental and fetal tissues.
We thank the Scottish Agricultural College Disease Surveillance Centre, Dumfries, for sample collection.
This work was funded by the Scottish Government Rural and Environment Research and Analysis Directorate and the Biological and Biotechnology Sciences Research Council.
- Cabell E. Bovine abortion: aetiology and investigations. In Pract. 2007;29:455–63.
- Henning K, Schares G, Granzow H, Polster U, Hartmann M, Hotzel H, Neospora caninum and Waddlia chondrophila strain 2032/99 in a septic stillborn calf. Vet Microbiol. 2002;85:285–92.
- Borel N, Ruhl S, Casson N, Kaiser C, Pospischil A, Greub G. Parachlamydia spp. and related Chlamydia-like organisms and bovine abortion. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:1904–7.
- Ruhl S, Casson N, Kaiser C, Thoma R, Pospischil A, Greub G, Evidence for Parachlamydia in bovine abortion. Vet Microbiol. 2009;135:169–74.
- Ossewaarde JM, Meijer A. Molecular evidence for the existence of additional members of the order Chlamydiales. Microbiology. 1999;145:411–7.
- Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1572–4.
- Milne I, Lindner D, Bayer M, Husmeier D, McGuire G, Marshall DF, TOPALi v2: a rich graphical interface for evolutionary analyses of multiple alignments on HPC clusters and multi-core desktops. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:126–7.
- Greub G. Parachlamydia acanthamoebae, an emerging agent of pneumonia. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2009;15:18–28.
- Baud D, Goy G, Gerber S, Vial Y, Hohlfeld P, Greub G. Evidence of maternal-fetal transmission of Parachlamydia acanthamoebae. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:120–1.
- Lamoth F, Aeby S, Schneider A, Jaton-Ogay K, Vaudaux B, Greub G. Parachlamydia and Rhabdochlamydia in premature neonates. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:2072–5.
- Figure. Bayesian phylogenetic tree demonstrating the relationship of 15 isolated organisms from the older chlamydiales samples to known chlamydial species. Cand., Candidatus; R., Rhabdochlamydia; P., Protochlamydia.
Suggested citation for this article: Wheelhouse N, Katzer F, Wright F, Longbottom D. Novel Chlamydia-like organisms as cause of bovine abortions, UK [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2010 Aug [date cited]. http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/16/8/09-1878
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Nicholas Wheelhouse, Moredun Research Institute, Pentlands Science Park, Bush Loan, Edinburgh, Scotland EH26 0PZ, UK
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: March 30, 2011
- Page last updated: March 30, 2011
- Page last reviewed: March 30, 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)