Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 17, Number 10—October 2011

Letter

Plasmodium vivax Seroprevalence in Bred Cynomolgus Monkeys, China1

Suggested citation for this article

To the Editor: Having worked with numerous species of research nonhuman primates over the past 26 years, I have a keen interest in related occupational health and safety. In this regard, I was quite interested in the recent report by Li et al. (1) and have some comments and questions relative to this article.

The occurrence of Plasmodium spp. infection in feral primates, feral source captive primates, or primates bred outdoors in malaria-endemic areas is not uncommon. However, with the exception of P. knowlesi, it is my understanding that malarial organisms found in cynomolgus monkeys do not pose a major zoonotic concern (although this can always change). Furthermore, it is my understanding that P. vivax does not infect macaques, including cynomolgus monkeys.

Other malarial parasites of cynomolgus monkeys, apart from P. knowlesi, may include P. cynomologi, P. inui, P. fieldi, and P. coatneyi. A recent publication reported that in wild-source cynomolgus monkeys in Malaysia, >90% of the animals tested were positive for >1 Plasmodium species. Furthermore, >80% of samples from these animals were positive by specific PCR for >1 of these organisms (2).

Using PCR for Plasmodium spp. identification, I have tested newly imported research cynomolgus monkeys from various breeding centers in China. I can confirm that some animals have subclinical malarial infections.

Except for the report by Li et al. (1), I am unaware of other reports of P. vivax in cynomolgus monkeys. It would be interesting to confirm the presence of this organism by using PCR primers specific for Plasmodium spp. My questions to the authors relate to the test method used in their study. Was an ELISA for detecting P. vivax antibodies the only diagnostic method used to identify this parasite? It may be useful to re-address the specificity of this test in differentiating various Plasmodium spp. Until these issues are clearly addressed, their reported results are not reliable.

David B. ElmoreComments to Author 
Author affiliation: DBE Veterinary Consulting, San Diego, California, USA

References

  1. Li H-L, Liu Z-Y, Li J, Ai L, Zhou D-H, Yuan Z-G, Plasmodium vivax seroprevalence in bred cynomolgus monkeys, China. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:9289.PubMed
  2. Lee K-S, Divis PCS, Zakaria SK, Matusop A, Julin RA, Conway DJ, Plasmodium knowlesi: reservoir hosts and tracking the emergence in humans and macaques. PLoS Pathog. 2011;7:e1002015. DOIPubMed

Suggested citation for this article: Elmore DB. Plasmodium vivax seroprevalence in bred cynomolgus monkeys, China [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 Oct [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1710.110719

DOI: 10.3201/eid1710.110719

1Li et al. have declined to respond to this letter.

Related Links

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 10—October 2011

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

David B. Elmore, DBE Veterinary Consulting, 1785 Guizot St, San Diego, CA 92107, USA

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

TOP