Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011
Livestock-associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Humans, Europe
To estimate the proportion of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates from humans that were sequence type (ST) 398, we surveyed 24 laboratories in 17 countries in Europe in 2007. Livestock-associated MRSA ST398 accounted for only a small proportion of MRSA isolates from humans; most were from the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, and Austria.
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was first associated with human disease in 2003, when a MRSA clone associated with a reservoir in pigs and cattle was isolated from a human. This clone was not typable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with SmaI macrorestriction digestion and belonged to multilocus sequence type (ST) 398 (1). Since then, rates of MRSA ST398 carriage have been high (25%–35%) for persons in the Netherlands who have frequent contact with pigs and veal calves, but associated illness is rare (2). However, in Europe, Asia, and the United States, invasive infections and a hospital outbreak of MRSA ST398 have been reported (3). We estimated the proportion of MRSA isolates from humans in Europe in 2007 that were ST398.
Questionnaires were mailed to 43 laboratories in 23 European countries, selected on the basis of expertise and publications about MRSA. Questions asked for level of laboratory and typing methods used, number of MRSA isolates identified in 2007, number of these isolates that were typed, and number of typed isolates that were MRSA ST398. MRSA isolates were considered to be ST398 if they 1) belonged to multilocus ST398, 2) were spa types t011, t034, t108, t567, t571, t588, t753, t898, t899, t1184, t1254, t1255, t1451, t1456, t1457, t2123, t2330, t2383, t2582, or t3013 (4; National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, unpub. data); or 3) were not typable by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis with SmaI macrorestriction digestion. Laboratories were asked to report data on clinical isolates only (as opposed to screening isolates) and to provide the distribution by body site.
For each laboratory, the proportion of MRSA ST398 among all typed MRSA isolates from humans and the 95% Wilson confidence interval (CI) were calculated. For laboratories that typed all MRSA isolates, χ2 testing compared proportions of isolates from various body sites for MRSA ST398 isolates and for other MRSA isolates.
For each country, we compared the proportions of MRSA ST398 among human MRSA isolates with number of pigs per km2, number of cattle <1 year of age (a surrogate for veal calves) per km2, and 2 indices multiplying these animal densities with human population densities. Criteria were that a laboratory had to report >100 MRSA isolates and type >25% of those isolates, thus leaving 14 national or regional laboratories from 12 countries. For Austria, data from 2 laboratories were pooled because these laboratories did not report duplicate isolates. For Denmark, only data on MRSA clinical isolates were used. Data for 2007 on midyear human population, pig production, and production of cattle <1 year of age were obtained from Eurostat (http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu) except for pig production in Switzerland (Swiss Statistics, www.bfs.admin.ch) and Turkey (Turkstat, www.turkstat.gov.tr). Land area was obtained from The World Factbook (www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook). For Germany, 1 region with high pig density was considered separately from the rest of the country. Data for this region (Eurostat regional Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics code DEA3, corresponding to laboratory 8) were obtained from Eurostat, the Chamber for Agriculture Nordrhein-Westfalen: “Zahlen zur Landwirtschaft 2008” (www.landwirtschaftskammer.de/wir/pdf/zahlen-landwirtschaft-2008.pdf), and the statistical office of Nordrhein-Westfalen in Germany.
Questionnaires were received from 24 laboratories (response rate 56%) in 17 countries. Data from Malta and Slovenia and from 1 laboratory in Italy were not analyzed because these laboratories did not type MRSA isolates. Among the remaining 15 countries, 8 countries reported a combined total of 8,262 MRSA isolates with typing results, of which 142 (1.7%, 95% CI 1.5–2.0%) were MRSA ST398 (Table 1). The proportions of MRSA ST398 per country were 0–11.9%; the countries with the highest proportion were the Netherlands (11.9%), Belgium (4.7%), Denmark (1.6%), and Austria (1.4%, pooled data). The proportion of isolates from blood was significantly lower for MRSA ST398 than for other MRSA clinical isolates. No difference was observed for other body sites (Table 2).
The proportion of MRSA ST398 among human MRSA isolates correlated with pig density (Spearman ρ = 0.79, p = 0.001) and with the index combining this density with human population density (Spearman ρ = 0.76, p = 0.002). The proportion of MRSA ST398 among human MRSA isolates also correlated, although less significantly, with the density of cattle <1 year of age (Spearman ρ = 0.61, p = 0.05) and with the index combining this density with human population density (Spearman ρ = 0.74, p = 0.01).
Livestock-associated MRSA ST398 was reported from 8 of 15 European countries. Except for 4 countries and 1 region in Germany, the proportion of MRSA ST398 among MRSA isolates from humans was <2%, suggesting that in 2007 this livestock-associated clone contributed to only a small fraction of all MRSA in humans. A recent study of laboratories in 26 European countries during September 2006–February 2007 found no MRSA ST398 among S. aureus isolates from persons with invasive infections (5).
MRSA ST398 has been isolated from human samples from Austria (5), the Netherlands (2), Belgium (6), Italy (7), Spain (8), Germany (9), Portugal (10), Denmark (11), the Czech Republic (12), Sweden (13), and France (14). This study demonstrated MRSA ST398 in human samples in Switzerland and Finland. Although few data have been published on the proportion of MRSA ST398 in Europe, Springer et al. (15) reported that during 2006 through mid-2008, among 1,043 human MRSA isolates in Austria, 21 (2.0%) were MRSA ST398, which is similar to the proportion (1.4%, pooled data) found in our study.
Among isolates from blood, a significantly lower proportion were MRSA ST398 than other MRSA. This finding suggests that MRSA ST398 is associated with less severe disease, as indicated (5).
The proportion of MRSA ST398 among human MRSA isolates in European countries correlated with pig and veal calf densities and with an index combining pig or veal calf density and human population density. In addition to the well-documented risk factor of occupational exposure to pigs and veal calves, proximity of humans to pigs and veal calves may contribute to transmission of MRSA ST398 from animals to humans. However, the fact that farms are not equally distributed throughout a country may explain the higher proportion of MRSA ST398 among MRSA isolates from humans in certain European countries and regions.
Use of readily available data bears some limitations. Laboratories were not randomly selected, which could result in selection bias. However, bias was limited because most laboratories were national reference laboratories that routinely collect MRSA isolates countrywide. Also, countries may have active national or local screening policies, may select which isolates to type, and may use typing techniques that are not always fully comparable. To minimize these variations, when possible we reported on data from clinical isolates only and excluded data from laboratories that reported few isolates and did not type most MRSA isolates. We also provided a list of MRSA spa types that at the time of the study had been identified as corresponding to MRSA ST398. Other spa types and multilocus sequence types belonging to the livestock-associated MRSA clones have been recently reported (4) and were not included in our study.
This cross-national prevalence study found livestock-associated MRSA ST398 in human samples in several European countries. However, the relatively low proportion of MRSA ST398 among MRSA isolates from humans in most countries suggests that MRSA ST398 contributes to only a small fraction of all MRSA in humans.
Ms van Cleef is a PhD student at the VU University Medical Centre in Amsterdam, and currently working at the National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) in Bilthoven, the Netherlands. Her primary research interest is the epidemiology of MRSA in pig farmers and their household members, using both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies.
We thank Robin Köck for providing data on the pig dense area in Germany.
- Huijsdens XW, van Dijke BJ, Spalburg E, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Heck ME, Pluister GN, Community-acquired MRSA and pig-farming. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. 2006;5:26.
- Broek van den IVF, Cleef van BAGL, Haenen A, Broens EM, Wolf van der PJ, Broek van den MJM, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people living and working in pig farms. Epidemiol. Infect. 2008;137:700–8.
- Wulf MW, Markestein A, van der Linden FT, Voss A, Klaassen C, Verduin CM. First outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in a Dutch hospital, June 2007. Euro Surveill. 2008;13: pii: 8051.
- Huijsdens XW, Bosch T, van Santen-Verheuvel MG, Spalburg E, Pluister GN, van Luit M, Molecular characterisation of PFGE non-typable methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the Netherlands, 2007. Euro Surveill. 2009;14:pii:19335.
- Grundmann H, Aanensen DM, van den Wijngaard CC, Spratt BG, Harmsen D, Friedrich AW, Geographic distribution of Staphylococcus aureus causing invasive infections in Europe: a molecular–epidemiological analysis. PLoS Med. 2010;7:e1000215.
- Denis O, Suetens C, Hallin M, Catry B, Ramboer I, Dispas M, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in swine farm personnel, Belgium. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1098–101.
- Soavi L, Stellini R, Signorini L, Antonini B, Pedroni P, Zanetti L, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398, Italy. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16:346–8.
- Wulf MW, Sørum M, van Nes A, Skov R, Melchers WJ, Klaassen CH, Prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among veterinarians: an international study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14:29–34.
- Witte W, Strommenger B, Stanek C, Cuny C. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in humans and animals, central Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:255–8.
- Pomba C, Hasman H, Cavaco LM, da Fonseca JD, Aarestrup FM. First description of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) CC30 and CC398 from swine in Portugal. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;34:193–4.
- Moodley A, Nightingale EC, Stegger M, Nielsen SS, Skov RL, Guardabassi L. High risk for nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Danish veterinary practitioners. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2008;34:151–7.
- Fridrichová M, Tyllová K, Machová I, Vrbová I, Kašík J, Žemličková H. First detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in veterinary personnel in Czech Republic (abstract P7). In: Programme and abstracts of the 26nd Annual Meeting of the Scandinavian Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. Tromsø, Norway, 2009 3–6 Sep. p. 51 [cited 2009 Nov 2]. http://www.ssac.nu
- Welinder-Olsson C, Floren-Johansson K, Larsson L, Oberg S, Karlsson L, Ahren C. Infection with Panton-Valentine leukocidin–positive methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus t034. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1271–2.
- Armand-Lefevre L, Ruimy R, Andremont A. Clonal comparison of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from healthy pig farmers, human controls, and pigs. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:711–4.
- Springer B, Orendi U, Much P, Hoeger G, Ruppitsch W, Krziwanek K, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new zoonotic agent? Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2009;121:86–90.
Suggested citation for this article: van Cleef BAGL, Monnet DL, Voss A, Krziwanek K, Allerberger F, Struelens M, et al. Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in humans, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 Mar [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1703.101036
1Current affiliation: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Stockholm, Sweden.
Comments to the Authors
Comments to the EID Editors
Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.
- Page created: July 25, 2011
- Page last updated: July 25, 2011
- Page last reviewed: July 25, 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)