Volume 17, Number 3—March 2011
Tetracycline-Resistant Vibrio cholerae O1, Kolkata, India
To the Editor: Cholera, caused by toxigenic strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 or O139, continues to be a major cause of illness and death, particularly in developing countries. Treatment consists of early administration of rehydration therapy with appropriate oral or intravenous fluids. The World Health Organization recommends antimicrobial drug treatment for severely dehydrated patients with suspected cholera because it substantially shortens the duration of diarrhea by reducing the volume of watery stools, decreases fluid requirements, and limits transmission by decreasing fecal excretion of V. cholerae (1). The progressive increase in resistance to multiple drugs among strains causing clinical cases of cholera in developing countries is becoming a serious concern. We report the emergence of tetracycline-resistant V. cholerae O1 in a well-defined population in Kolkata, India, during 2007–2009.
During a 6-year surveillance period (2004–2009), we conducted a prospective, community-based study at an impoverished urban site in Kolkata. The goals of the study were to estimate the prevalence of cholera, describe its epidemiology, and identify potential risk factors that could be addressed by public health strategies.
Rectal swabs samples from patient with diarrhea were obtained, placed in Cary-Blair transport medium, and transported to the laboratory where they were processed for isolation and identification of Vibrio spp. Specimens were plated directly onto thiosulphate citrate bile salt sucrose agar (Eiken Chemical Company, Tokyo, Japan). The specimens were plated directly onto thiosulfate citrate bile salt sucrose agar. They were then incubated in alkaline peptone water (pH 8.6) for 6–8 h at 37°C and then plated onto the agar. After overnight incubation at 37°C, suspected colonies were tested biochemically and confirmed by slide agglutination with polyvalent O1 and monovalent Ogawa and Inaba antiserum (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA).
Antimicrobial drug susceptibility testing was performed by using the disk diffusion technique on Mueller-Hinton agar (Difco Laboratories) with commercial disks (Oxoid, Cambridge, UK) and appropriate control strains (2). The MIC of tetracycline was determined with 101 randomly selected strains by Etest (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) following manufacturer’s instructions.
During the 2004–2009 surveillance period, we isolated 809 V. cholerae O1 organisms, among which 624 (77%) were Ogawa and 185 (23%) were Inaba serotypes. The latter became the predominant serotype only in 2006. In 2007, a sudden upsurge in tetracycline resistance was noted among V. cholerae isolates, from 1% in 2004 to 76% in 2007 before decreasing to ≈50% in 2009. An increase in resistance to furazolidone and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was also observed during the same period. Of the strains that were resistant to tetracycline, 99% were also resistant to furazolidone and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (online Appendix Figure, www.cdc.gov/EID/content/17/3/568-appF.htm).
Among the tetracycline-resistant isolates (101 randomly selected strains), 43% had high-level resistance (MIC >16 µg/mL). In addition, 57% of V. cholerae O1 organisms had reduced susceptibility (i.e., MICs ranged from 8 µg/mL to 16 µg/mL).
Tetracycline is the drug of choice for treating cholera (1); however, during the 6-year period, we observed the emergence of tetracycline resistance among V. cholerae O1 isolates and a sudden upsurge in such resistance in 2007 when 76% of the isolates were resistant. Tetracycline resistance was also reported by Mhalu et al. (3), from an epidemic of cholera in Tanzania, where 76% of isolates were found to be resistant after 5 months of extensive use of this drug for treatment and prophylaxis. In a similar situation, the extensive prophylactic use of tetracycline triggered the rapid emergence and spread of tetracycline-resistant strains in Madagascar (4). Tetracycline is not used for prophylaxis in Kolkata, a known cholera-endemic area. Nonetheless, the emergence of resistant strains in our study area is not surprising because similar tetracycline-resistant strains of V. cholerae have been reported in Bangladesh (5), in Mozambique (6), and in another study of Kolkata (7). Notably, tetracycline-resistant V. cholerae O1 strains have also been responsible for major epidemics in Latin America, Tanzania, Bangladesh, and Zaire (8).
In our study, resistance to tetracycline among V. cholerae O1 isolates was <10% during 2004–2006. The reasons for the sudden rise of resistant strains in 2007 and their continued persistence are still unclear. Detailed molecular studies are underway to find the explanation. Alternative drugs, such as the newer fluoroquinolones, possess excellent activity against V. cholerae O1 and O139 serogroups. However, increased resistance to newer fluoroquinolones, such as ciprofloxacin and norfloxacin, among V. cholerae strains belonging to O1 serogroup has also been reported (9).
Resistance to commonly used antimicrobial drugs represents a critical public health problem because it complicates treatment and may result in longer hospital stays for patients. In addition, most of the population in developing countries cannot afford the newer and more expensive drugs. Our findings emphasize the need for continued surveillance of antimicrobial drug susceptibility patterns of V. cholerae. Providing early information on antimicrobial drug susceptibility to practitioners in affected areas will lessen the illness and death from this devastating disease.
- World Health Organization. The treatment of diarrhoea: a manual for physicians and other senior health workers, 4th revision. WHO/CDD/SER/80.2. Geneva: The Organization; 2005.
- Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45:493–6.
- Mhalu FS, Mmari PW, Ijumba J. Rapid emergence of El Tor Vibrio cholerae resistant to antimicrobial agents during the first six months of fourth cholera epidemic in Tanzania. Lancet. 1979;1:3457.
- Dromigny JA, Alson OR, Rajaonatahina D, Migliani R, Ranjalahy J, Mauclère P. Emergence and rapid spread of tetracycline-resistant Vibrio cholerae strains, Madagascar. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:136.
- Glass RI, Huq I, Alim AR, Yunus M. Emergence of multiply antibiotic-resistant Vibrio cholerae in Bangladesh. J Infect Dis. 1980;142:939–42.
- Mandomando I, Espasa M, Vallès X, Sacarlal J, Sigaúque B, Ruiz J, Antimicrobial resistance of Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype Ogawa isolated in Manhica District Hospital, southern Mozambique. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60:662–4.
- Roychowdhury A, Pan A, Dutta D, Mukhopadhyay AK, Ramamurthy T, Nandy RK, et al. Emergence of tetracycline-resistant Vibrio cholerae O1 serotype Inaba, in Kolkata, India. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2008;61:128–9.
- Garg P, Chakraborty S, Basu I, Datta S, Rajendran K, Bhattacharya T, Expanding multiple antibiotic resistance among clinical strains of Vibrio cholerae isolated from 1992–7 in Calcutta, India. Epidemiol Infect. 2000;124:393–9.
- Garg P, Sinha S, Chakraborty R, Bhattacharya SK, Nair GB, Ramamurthy T, Emergence of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of Vibrio cholerae O1 biotype El Tor among hospitalised patients with cholera in Calcutta, India. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2001;45:1605–6.
- Appendix. Figure. Antimicrobial drug resistance patterns of Vibrio cholerae O1, Kolkata, India, 2004–2009.
Suggested citation for this article: Bhattacharya K, Kanungo S, Sur D, Sarkar BL, Manna B, Lopez AL, et al. Tetracycline-resistant Vibrio cholerae O1, Kolkata, India [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2011 Mar [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1703.101176
1Current affiliation: Pfizer Inc., Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, People’s Republic of China.
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Suman Kanungo, National Institute of Cholera and Enteric Diseases, P-33, CIT Rd, PO-Beliaghata, Kolkata 700010, India
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: July 25, 2011
- Page last updated: July 25, 2011
- Page last reviewed: July 25, 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)