Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 17, Number 6—June 2011
Letter

Swine Influenza Virus A (H3N2) Infection in Human, Kansas, USA, 2009

Cite This Article

To the Editor: Triple-reassortant swine influenza viruses (SIVs), which contain genes from human, swine, and avian influenza A viruses, have been enzootic among swine herds in the United States since the late 1990s (1). Although uncommon, occasional transmission of triple-reassortant SIVs from swine to humans has occurred (24). Before April 2009, only limited, nonsustained human-to-human transmission of SIVs had been reported (57). Although an animal source for pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus has yet to be identified, the pandemic strain resulted from the reassortment of 2 different lineages of SIV (8).

On July 28, 2009, a 12-year-old Kansas boy sought treatment for fever, cough, and sore throat. Results of an influenza rapid antigen test were positive, and a specimen was sent to the Kansas Department of Health and Environment for further testing. Real-time reverse transcription PCR (rRT-PCR) testing determined the virus contained the surface hemagglutinin (HA) gene of influenza A (H3) and the internal nucleoprotein gene common to all triple-reassortant SIVs (9). The specimen was sent to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (Atlanta, GA, USA) on August 3 and identified as swine-origin influenza virus A (H3N2) by rRT-PCR and sequence analysis.

The patient reported that during July 23–25, 2009, he touched healthy-appearing swine multiple times while attending a county fair. The boy received a standard treatment course of oseltamivir and recovered completely. None of his 3 household contacts attended the fair, and none reported signs or symptoms of illness in the weeks afterward.

The Kansas Department of Health and Environment and the local health department collaborated with the county extension office to identify and interview swine exhibitors at the county fair, focusing on influenza symptoms among exhibitors and household contacts during the week before and after the fair. Twenty-seven (79%) of 34 exhibitors participated in the survey; none reported signs or symptoms of influenza-like illness, defined as fever (temperature >100°F) accompanied by either cough or sore throat. Two household contacts of separate exhibitors each reported a low-grade fever (<100°F) and sore throat in the week after the fair. Both touched swine while attending the fair. Both visited a physician’s office; neither was tested for influenza; and symptoms of both resolved without treatment. The veterinarian overseeing the swine barn reported no signs of respiratory illness among the swine during the fair. Most swine exhibited were slaughtered at the fair’s conclusion.

On August 7, the Kansas Animal Health Department collected nasal swab specimens and blood samples from 13 swine belonging to 7 exhibitors. All samples were delivered to the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory for analysis by influenza matrix rRT-PCR and virus isolation on nasal swab samples and hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assays against classical swine influenza virus (H1N1) (A/swine/Iowa/73) and the prototype swine influenza virus (H3N2) (A/swine/Texas/98) on serum samples. In addition, the influenza virus (H3N2) “county fair” isolate, A/Kansas/13/2009 (H3N2), was sent from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, amplified, and used to develop a second HI assay that included the original swine serum samples as well as paired convalescent-phase samples from 3 of the swine (Table).

Influenza matrix RT-PCR and virus isolation on nasal swab samples were negative. HI assays demonstrated little or no antibody against the influenza (H1N1) indicator virus and low-level antibody reaction against the prototype swine influenza virus (H3N2). However, HI titers against the “county fair” influenza virus (H3N2) showed consistently elevated titers, which suggested that the animals might have been exposed to the virus 2 weeks earlier, during the time of the fair. The swine may have cleared the virus by the time the nasal swabs were collected, but without positive RT-PCR or virus isolation results, the situation remain inconclusive.

We compared the HA gene segment of A/Kansas/13/2009 (H3N2) with recent animal and human influenza (H3N2) viruses by using the neighbor-joining method, and it clustered with the HA from recent triple-reassortant SIV (H3N2) isolates (Figure A1) (10). A/Kansas/13/2009 (H3N2) shares >97% nucleotide identity with 2 swine viruses reported to have caused human infections, A/Ontario/RV1273/2005 and A/Ontario/1252/2007, and >90% nucleotide identity with currently circulating seasonal (H3N2) viruses, such as A/Perth/16/2009. Sequence analysis for the remaining 7 gene segments confirmed A/Kansas/13/2009 as triple-reassortant SIV (H3N2), belonging to the same lineages as the genes for the reference virus A/swine/Texas/98 (data not shown). A full genome sequence for A/Kansas/13/2009 (H3N2) has been submitted to GenBank (accession nos. GU937743–GU937750).

This case emphasizes the importance of epidemiologic and laboratory surveillance in areas where humans and swine are in close contact. When novel influenza A infection occurs in humans, joint investigations by local, state, and federal public health and animal health agencies are key to determining the source of infection and extent of transmission. The worldwide spread of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus emphasizes the ongoing public health threat of interspecies influenza transmission. Improved surveillance among swine may lead to early identification of novel viruses with pandemic potential and provide early opportunities to implement control measures.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank the staff of the Kansas State University Research and Extension, the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, the Kansas State Animal Health Department, the Riley County Health Department, and the Kansas Department of Health and Environment who coordinated this investigation.

Top

Chad M. CoxComments to Author , Daniel Neises, Rebecca J. Garten, Bill Bryant, Richard A. Hesse, Gary A. Anderson, Ingrid Trevino-Garrison, Bo Shu, Stephen Lindstrom, Alexander I. Klimov, and Lyn Finelli
Author affiliations: Author affiliations: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (C.M. Cox, R.J. Garten, B. Shu, S. Lindstrom, A.I. Klimov, L. Finelli); Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Topeka, Kansas, USA (D. Neises, I. Trevino-Garrison); Kansas Animal Health Department, Topeka (B. Bryant); Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Manhattan, Kansas, USA (R.A. Hesse, G.A. Anderson)

Top

References

  1. Karasin  AI, Schutten  MM, Cooper  LA, Smith  CB, Subbarao  K, Anderson  GA, Genetic characterization of H3N2 influenza viruses isolated from pigs in North America, 1977–1999: evidence for wholly human and reassortant virus genotypes. Virus Res. 2000;68:7185. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Newman  AP, Reisdorf  E, Beinemann  J, Uyeki  TM, Balish  A, Shu  B, Human case of swine influenza A (H1N1) triple reassortant virus infection, Wisconsin. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:14702. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Olsen  CW, Karasin  AI, Carman  S, Li  Y, Bastien  N, Ojkic  D, Triple reassortant H3N2 influenza A viruses, Canada, 2005. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:11325.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Shinde  V, Bridges  CB, Uyeki  TM, Shu  B, Balish  A, Xu  X, Triple-reassortant swine influenza A (H1) in humans in the United States, 2005–2009. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:261625. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Robinson  JL, Lee  BE, Patel  J, Bastien  N, Grimsrud  K, Seal  RF, Swine influenza (H3N2) infection in a child and possible community transmission, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13:186570.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Wells  DL, Hopfensperger  DJ, Arden  NH, Harmon  MW, Davis  JP, Tipple  MA, Swine influenza virus infections. Transmission from ill pigs to humans at a Wisconsin agricultural fair and subsequent probable person-to-person transmission. JAMA. 1991;265:47881. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Top  FH Jr, Russell  PK. Swine influenza A at Fort Dix, New Jersey (January–February 1976). IV. Summary and speculation. J Infect Dis. 1977;136(Suppl):S37680. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Garten  RJ, Davis  CT, Russell  CA, Shu  B, Lindstrom  S, Balish  A, Antigenic and genetic characteristics of swine-origin 2009 A(H1N1) influenza viruses circulating in humans. Science. 2009;325:197201. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. World Health Organization. CDC protocol of real-time RTPCR for influenza A (H1N1). 2009 April 30, 2009 [cited 2010 July 6]; http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/swineflu/realtimeptpcr/en/index.html
  10. Tamura  K, Dudley  J, Nei  M, Kumar  S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24:15969. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid1706.101488

Related Links

Top

Table of Contents – Volume 17, Number 6—June 2011

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Chad M. Cox, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Mailstop A32, Atlanta, GA 30333, USA

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 03, 2011
Page updated: August 03, 2011
Page reviewed: August 03, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external