Volume 17, Number 7—July 2011
Yersinia pestis in Small Rodents, Mongolia
Highlight and copy the desired format.
|EID||Riehm JM, Tserennorov D, Kiefer D, Stuermer IW, Tomaso H, Zöller L, et al. Yersinia pestis in Small Rodents, Mongolia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17(7):1320-1322. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1707.100740|
|AMA||Riehm JM, Tserennorov D, Kiefer D, et al. Yersinia pestis in Small Rodents, Mongolia. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2011;17(7):1320-1322. doi:10.3201/eid1707.100740.|
|APA||Riehm, J. M., Tserennorov, D., Kiefer, D., Stuermer, I. W., Tomaso, H., Zöller, L....Scholz, H. C. (2011). Yersinia pestis in Small Rodents, Mongolia. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 17(7), 1320-1322. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1707.100740.|
To the Editor: Plague is known to be endemic in several areas of Mongolia, but transmission to humans seems to play only a minor role because the number of recognized cases is relatively low (Figure) (1). The first human cases in Mongolia were reported to the World Health Organization in 1980, and <20 human cases have occurred each year since then (2). However, human plague was first reported in 1897 (3), such infections have been documented since the 1940s, and Yersinia pestis can be found in many provinces of Mongolia (Figure; T. Damindorj, pers. comm.) (3,4).
The most common source of human plague in Mongolia is contact with and consumption of the marmot (Marmota sibirica) (1). Moreover, the great gerbil (Rhombomys opimus) and the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) are suspected of being enzootic reservoirs. Although small rodents are also assumed to be reservoirs of Y. pestis, the interaction of individual mammals or fleas of particular species in the infectious cycle and the dynamics of an epizootic are not yet clear (5). In a retrospective study, we screened tissue samples from small rodents for Y. pestis DNA to investigate the prevalence of Y. pestis in a potential enzootic reservoir.
During the course of zoologic investigations in Mongolia during 2002, 2005, and 2006, 133 rodents (gerbils, jerboas, and squirrels) were trapped by standard methods (5), dissected, and cataloged (Figure). Documentation included species, sex, date and location of trapping, animal size (weight, length) and organ dimensions, as well as all pathologic findings. Although the trapped animals showed a high degree of parasitic infestation, signs of a severe infectious disease were not observed. After the dissection of animals, samples were conserved in 70% ethanol.
Subsequently, total DNA was extracted from alcohol-conserved spleen and liver tissue of 133 animals by using QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hamburg, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Screening was performed by using a real-time PCR targeting the pla gene of Y. pestis pPCP1, including a PCR inhibition control, as described (6). As positive control, the Y. pestis vaccine strain EV76 was used. As negative controls, we included tissues of 53 laboratory rodents, which were processed analogs, beginning with DNA extraction.
In the real-time PCR targeting the pla gene, 7 (5.3%) of 133 spleen tissue samples were positive for Y. pestis. In contrast, all liver samples and samples of laboratory rodents tested negative. Identification of several host species was supported by partial sequencing of the cytochrome b gene (7). The animals tested positive for plague were gerbils (Meriones sp., 1; M. unguiculatus, 2; Rhombomys opimus, 2) and jerboas (Allactaga sibirica, 1; Cardiocranius paradoxus, 1).
The identity of the 230-bp pla PCR fragment was confirmed by DNA sequencing, showing 100% similarity to the pla gene sequences deposited in the European Molecular Biology Laboratory nucleotide database. Molecular subtyping of the 7 pla-positive DNA samples was attempted by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats analysis, targeting the 3 loci YPa, YPb, and YPc, respectively. Also included was DNA originating from the above-mentioned negative control tissues. However, only 1 sample from the spleen of a M. unguiculatus gerbil found the YPb locus, which then was sequenced, and resulted in the spacer signature b1-b2-b3-b4-b5′. This signature is known from a Y. pestis biovar, Orientalis, that has been isolated from Rattus flavipectus rats in the plague focus of the Yunnan–Guangdong–Fujian provinces in the People’s Republic of China (8).
Detection of Y. pestis–specific DNA in wild rodents has been described. For instance, a wild rodent community in the eastern Sierra Nevada mountains in the United States was screened for plague by pla-specific real-time PCR; of 89 rodents, 1 chipmunk (1.1%) had positive results (9).
The permanent presence of Y. pestis in rodent communities in North America has led to smaller and more distant-living colonies of prairie dogs (10). Strikingly, in the present study, >5% of the screened rodents were found to carry Y. pestis DNA. This high number was unexpected for the investigated areas, which have had a low level of plague activity (Figure). To our knowledge, Y. pestis has also not yet been reported in Manlai Sum (district) in the Umnugovi Aimag (subdivision) (Figure) (2–4) nor has the presence of Y. pestis DNA in a Cardiocranius paradoxus jerboa.
Our findings emphasize that rodents play a role as zoonotic reservoirs of Y. pestis in Mongolia and that the actual prevalence of plague seems to be underestimated. The low population density in Mongolia explains the low amount of illness in humans. Further investigations should include the screening of rodent populations near the plague-positive loci. In addition, fleas and other parasites (and also predators of small mammals) should be studied. Mongolia is a key area of plague genesis and therefore is an ideal location for more detailed study of the role of rodents as epizootic and enzootic reservoirs of Y. pestis.
We thank Gabriele Echle, Philipp Vette, and Astrid Thomas for excellent technical assistance and Gilles Vergnaud for providing access to the CRISPR database (http://crispr.u-psud.fr/crispr).
- Ebright JR, Altantsetseg T, Oyungerei R. Emerging infectious diseases in Mongolia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:1509–15.
- World Health Organization. Plague manual: epidemiology, distribution, surveillance and control. Geneva: The Organization; 1999.
- Galdan B, Baatar U, Molotov B, Dashdavaa O. Plague in Mongolia. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10:69–75.
- Anisimov AP, Lindler LE, Pier GB. Intraspecific diversity of Yersinia pestis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2004;17:434–64.
- Brinkerhoff RJ, Collinge SK, Ray C, Gage KL. Rodent and flea abundance fail to predict a plague epizootic in black-tailed prairie dogs. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10:47–52.
- Tomaso H, Reisinger EC, Al Dahouk S, Frangoulidis D, Rakin A, Landt O, Rapid detection of Yersinia pestis with multiplex real-time PCR assays using fluorescent hybridisation probes. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2003;38:117–26.
- Essbauer S, Schmidt J, Conraths FJ, Friedrich R, Koch J, Hautmann W, A new Puumala hantavirus subtype in rodents associated with an outbreak of nephropathia epidemica in south-east Germany in 2004. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:1333–44.
- Cui Y, Li Y, Gorgé O, Platonov ME, Yan Y, Guo Z, Insight into microevolution of Yersinia pestis by clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats. PLoS ONE. 2008;3:e2652.
- Adjemian JZ, Adjemian MK, Foley P, Chomel BB, Kasten RW, Foley JE. Evidence of multiple zoonotic agents in a wild rodent community in the eastern Sierra Nevada. J Wildl Dis. 2008;44:737–42.
- Cully JF, Johnson TL, Collinge SK, Ray C. Disease limits populations: plague and black-tailed prairie dogs. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2010;10:7–15.
- Figure. Yersina pestis in rodents in Mongolia. Shaded areas show the known distribution of enzootic plague in Mongolia during 1948–1999 (V. Batsaikhan, J. Myagmar, G. Bolormaa, National Center for Infectious Diseases...
Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:
Julia M. Riehm, Bundeswehr Institute of Microbiology, Neuherbergstr. 11, 80939 Munich, Germany
Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: August 15, 2011
- Page last updated: August 15, 2011
- Page last reviewed: August 15, 2011
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)