Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 18, Number 2—February 2012

Letter

Geographic Distribution of Endemic Fungal Infections among Older Persons, United States

On This Page

Tables

Suggested citation for this article

To the Editor: We read with interest the article by Baddley et al. (1) and appreciate their efforts to characterize incidence rates of mycoses. We agree that histoplasmosis, blastomycosis, and coccidioidomycosis are differential diagnoses for patients with consistent symptoms but who reside outside mycosis-endemic areas.

However, we believe that the methods of Baddley et al. probably do not determine the true incidence of these mycoses in sparsely populated states such as Arkansas. Their estimates contrast markedly with surveillance data from the Arkansas Department of Health (Table) and with our clinical experience as infectious disease physicians. We characterize Arkansas as a state in which histoplasmosis and blastomycosis incidence is high and coccidioidomycosis incidence is low; however, Baddley et al. indicate that in Arkansas, incidence of blastomycosis is relatively low and incidence of coccidioidomycosis is high.

To investigate whether this finding might be associated with their small 5% sample of Medicare beneficiaries, we used data from the Arkansas census to determine that in 2008 the population of adults >65 years of age was ≈407,014, and during 1999–2008, there were ≈3,840,896 person-years for persons in this age group. A 5% sample would account for ≈192,045 person-years. Using their rate ranges (7.84–12.3 cases/100,000 person-years for histoplasmosis, 3.97–6.71 for coccidioidomycosis, and 0.39–0.86 for blastomycosis), we calculated the approximate numbers of cases in their sample: 15–23 histoplasmosis cases, 7–12 coccidioidomycosis cases, and only 1 blastomycosis case. Compared with rates from surveillance averaged over the 10 years, the midpoints of the Baddley et al. estimates are ≈6-fold higher for histoplasmosis, ≈60-fold higher for coccidioidomycosis, and ≈0.4-fold lower for blastomycosis. Only their estimate for blastomycosis incidence falls within the 10-year 95% CIs from surveillance data. We believe that the small cell sizes require that the rate estimates of Baddley et al. be interpreted with care, especially with respect to less populous states.

Dirk Haselow, Mike Saccente, Keyur Vyas, Ryan Bariola, Haytham Safi, Robert Bradsher, Nate Smith, and James Phillips
Author affiliations: Arkansas Department of Health, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA (D. Haselow, H. Safi, N. Smith, J. Phillips); University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock (D. Haselow, M. Saccente, K. Vyas, R. Bariola, R. Bradsher, N. Smith)

References

  1. Baddley JW, Winthrop KL, Patkar NM, Delzell E, Beukelman T, Xie F, Geographic distribution of endemic fungal infections among older persons, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:16649. DOIPubMed

Table

Suggested citation for this article: Haselow D, Saccente M, Vyas K, Bariola R, Safi H, Bradsher R, et al. Geographic distribution of endemic fungal infections among older persons, United States [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2012 Feb [date cited]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1802.111537

DOI: 10.3201/eid1802.111537

Related Links

In Response: We thank Haselow et al. (1) for their careful review of our article (2). They raise the relevant concern about potential instability of incidence rates from our data because of small cell sizes. We agree that use of administrative data has major limitations. As such, our intent was not to compare infection incidences of individual states; but rather, our intent was to focus on geographic distribution of endemic mycoses and whether infections occurred in non–mycosis-endemic areas.

Specifically, for blastomycosis, our study showed incidence in Arkansas to be 0.8 (0.12–5.8) cases per 100,000 person-years, comparable to the rate provided by Haselow et al. of 1.1 case per 100,000 person-years (1). For coccidioidomycosis, our study found the rate to be much higher than that calculated from the Arkansas surveillance data. Potential reasons for this discrepancy might be lack of case capture with surveillance data, because mandatory reporting for coccidioidomycosis is not required in Arkansas, or misclassification of incident cases in the administrative data. Finally, for histoplasmosis, the incidence rate calculated from administrative data was much higher than that reported by Haselow et al. By using administrative data, we identified a large number (15) of cases and doubt that rate instability is present. We agree that surveillance that uses administrative data has inherent limitations, which require that care be taken when interpreting epidemiologic measures, especially when sample sizes are small.

John W. BaddleyComments to Author , Fenglong Xie, and Jeffrey R. Curtis
Author affiliations: University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA

References

  1. Haselow D, Saccente M, Vyas K, Bariola R, Safi H, Bradsher R, Geographic distribution of endemic fungal infections among older persons, United States [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis. 2012;18:361 .DOI
  2. Baddley JW, Winthrop KL, Patkar NM, Delzell E, Beukelman T, Xie F, Geographic distribution of endemic fungal infections among older persons, United States. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:16649. DOIPubMed

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 2—February 2012

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors:

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

TOP