Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 4—April 2012
Dispatch

Characterization of Mycobacterium orygis as M. tuberculosis Complex Subspecies

Jakko van IngenComments to Author , Zeaur Rahim, Arnout Mulder, Martin J. Boeree, Roxane Simeone, Roland Brosch, and Dick van Soolingen
Author affiliations: Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (J. van Ingen, M.J. Boeree, D. van Soolingen); International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh (Z. Rahim); National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands (A. Mulder, D. van Soolingen); Institut Pasteur, Paris, France (R. Simeone, R. Brosch)

Main Article

Figure 1

Spoligotyping and 24-locus variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) typing results for Mycobacterium orygis. A) Spoligotyping patterns for the oryx bacillus isolates in this study; ST587 is the most common pattern (labeled SB0422 at www.mbovis.org), with minor deviations. B) Minimum spanning tree based on 24-locus VNTR typing results for the oryx bacillus isolates in this study. One type dominates, with few strains representing minor variations. The dominant clone includes isolates from humans and a

Figure 1. Spoligotyping and 24-locus variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) typing results for Mycobacterium orygis. A) Spoligotyping patterns for the oryx bacillus isolates in this study; ST587 is the most common pattern (labeled SB0422 at www.mbovis.org), with minor deviations. B) Minimum spanning tree based on 24-locus VNTR typing results for the oryx bacillus isolates in this study. One type dominates, with few strains representing minor variations. The dominant clone includes isolates from humans and animals. P, pulmonary; LN, lymph node; G, gastric juice. Both panels were created by using BioNumerics version 6.1 software (Applied Maths, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium); similarity coefficients were calculated by using Dice (spoligotyping) and Pearson (VNTR) methods; cluster analysis was done by the UPGMA (unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean). Isolate 10–1562 (cow, Bangladesh) could not be included in (B) because of insufficient DNA.

Main Article

Page created: March 15, 2012
Page updated: March 15, 2012
Page reviewed: March 15, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external