Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 18, Number 4—April 2012

Dispatch

Drug Susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing Genotype and Association with MDR TB

Jurriaan E.M. de SteenwinkelComments to Author , Marian T. ten Kate, Gerjo J. de Knegt, Kristin Kremer, Rob E. Aarnoutse, Martin J. Boeree, Henri A. Verbrugh, Dick van Soolingen, and Irma A.J.M. Bakker-Woudenberg
Author affiliations: Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (J.E.M. de Steenwinkel, M.T. ten Kate, G.J. de Knegt, H.A. Verbrugh, I.A.J.M. Bakker-Woudenberg); National Institute of Public Health and the Environment Center for Infectious Disease Control (RIVM),; Bilthoven, the Netherlands (K. Kremer, D. van Soolingen); World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark (K. Kremer); Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (R.E. Aarnoutse, M.J. Boeree, D. van Soolingen)

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

To determine differences in the ability of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains to withstand antituberculosis drug treatment, we compared the activity of antituberculosis drugs against susceptible Beijing and East-African/Indian genotype M. tuberculosis strains. Beijing genotype strains showed high rates of mutation within a wide range of drug concentrations, possibly explaining this genotype’s association with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

The emergence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis resistance to antituberculosis (anti-TB) drugs is a major public health challenge that is threatening World Health Organization targets set for the elimination of TB (1). Approximately 500,000 cases of multidrug-resistant TB (MDR TB) are diagnosed annually, but the true magnitude of the MDR TB problem is not known because adequate laboratory tools are lacking. Multiple factors contribute to low cure rates, treatment failures, and relapses: poor-quality guidance regarding treatment, HIV co-infection, transmission of resistant forms of TB, underdeveloped laboratory services, and unavailability of alternative drug treatments. However, the evolution of M. tuberculosis is an additional factor that presumably fuels the worldwide problem of emerging resistance. The Beijing genotype is significantly associated with drug resistance (2,3), especially in geographic areas where prevalence of resistance to anti-TB drugs is high, and it is associated with recent TB transmission (26). There are also indications that the population structure of M. tuberculosis in areas with a high prevalence of anti-TB drug resistance is changing rapidly toward an increase in Beijing genotype strains (2,68).

The World Health Organization target rates for detecting and curing TB in Vietnam have been met; however, the rate of TB infection is not decreasing as expected (4,5). Earlier in this country, the Beijing genotype was strongly correlated with MDR TB and treatment failures (9). Extensive molecular epidemiologic studies showed that the Beijing and East-African/Indian (EAI) genotypes are predominating in Vietnam; each lineage causes ≈40% of the TB cases. According to the single-nucleotide polymorphism typing described by Hershberg et al. (10), the Beijing genotype is a representative of the modern lineage, and the EAI genotype is believed to represent an evolutionary lineage more closely related to the common ancestor of the M. tuberculosis complex.

We compared the in vitro activity of anti-TB drugs against susceptible Beijing and EAI M. tuberculosis isolates from Vietnam and determined the in vitro mutation frequency of these strains during drug exposure. We also determined time-kill kinetics of anti-TB drugs and assessed the emergence of resistant mutants and the concentration range within which resistant mutants and no susceptible mycobacteria were selected. The concentration at which resistant mutants did not emerge (the mutant prevention concentration) was also ascertained. By using this approach, we established an in vitro model for determining differences in the ability of M. tuberculosis strains to resist anti-TB drug treatment.

The Study

Results of a liquid culturing system (BD BACTEC MGIT 960 System; BD Diagnostics, Sparks, MD, US) (for details, see the Technical Appendix [PDF - 72 KB - 4 pages]) showed that all 5 Beijing and 5 EAI genotype strains were susceptible to isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), moxifloxacin (MXF), and amikacin (AMK). MICs were determined by using the agar proportion method (11), which showed that ranges were small for the Beijing and EAI genotype strains: INH, 0.062–0.125 mg/L; RIF, 0.125–1 mg/L; MXF, 0.125–0.5 mg/L; and AMK, 0.5–2 mg/L. Duplicate values showed only minor differences.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Frequency of rifampin (RIF)-resistant mutants in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing and East-African/Indian (EAI) genotype strains (5 strains each) originating from Vietnam. Mutation frequencies were determined in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed by using an unpaired Mann-Whitney test.

Figure 1. Frequency of rifampin (RIF)-resistant mutants in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing and East-African/Indian (EAI) genotype strains (5 strains each) originating from Vietnam. Mutation frequencies were determined in duplicate. Statistical analysis was performed by...

We determined the mutation frequencies of the Beijing and EAI genotype strains by using previously defined critical drug concentrations of 1 mg/L for INH, RIF, and MXF and 5 mg/L for AMK (11,12) (for details, see the Technical Appendix [PDF - 72 KB - 4 pages]). The mutation frequencies of the Beijing and EAI genotype strains were similar for INH, MXF, and AMK, but they were significantly different for RIF (1.6 × 10−5 to 5.4 × 10−3 for Beijing strains vs. 6.3 × 10−8 to 3.8 × 10−4 for EAI strains; p = 0.003, unpaired Mann-Whitney test) (Table 1; Figure 1). Because rifamycin drugs are widely used to treat TB, the difference in the mutation frequencies of Beijing and EAI genotype strains for RIF is a major finding.

For Beijing genotype strains, the increase in mutation frequency during exposure to RIF could be due to described missense mutations in the mut genes (13). Such mutations in the mut genes can change the DNA repair mechanism; as a consequence, the frequency of resistant mutant formation might increase. However, a direct correlation between the occurrence of particular mutations in mut genes and altered mutation frequency has not been proven. Furthermore, Werngren and Hoffner (14) found an equal mutation frequency for Beijing (3.6 × 10−8) and non-Beijing (4.4 × 10−8) genotypes. A possible explanation for the discrepancy in findings might be the concentration of RIF used in the subculture plates. In our study, the critical concentration of 1 mg/L RIF was used (11), whereas Werngren and Hoffner used a concentration of 2 mg/L RIF. In addition, Werngren and Hoffner compared the Beijing and non-Beijing genotypes of several genotype families, whereas we compared Beijing and EAI genotype strains that were selected from the same tuberculosis-endemic area and during the same period.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Concentration- and time-dependent bactericidal effect of rifampin (RIF) toward low-density cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis BE-1585 (5.1 × 105 CFU/mL) (A) and M. tuberculosis EAI-1627 (6.8 × 105 CFU/mL) (B). Cultures were exposed to RIF at 2-fold increasing concentrations for 6 days at 37°C. After 1, 3, or 6 days of exposure, subcultures were performed on solid media to count CFUs. *Accurate CFU counting could not be performed because complete outgrowth of mycobacteria occurre

Figure 2. Concentration- and time-dependent bactericidal effect of rifampin (RIF) toward low-density cultures of Mycobacterium tuberculosis BE-1585 (5.1 × 105 CFU/mL) (A) and M. tuberculosis EAI-1627 (6.8 × 105 CFU/mL) (B). Cultures were...

We determined the time-kill kinetics of RIF toward 2 strains with significantly different mutation frequencies: Beijing-1585 (3.7 × 10−3 [3.0 × 10−3 and 4.3 × 10−3, duplicates]) and EAI-1627 (3.5 × 10−6 [2.8 × 10−6 and 4.1 × 10−6, duplicates]). Cultures with low and high densities of Beijing-1585 and EAI-1627 were investigated as described (15). RIF showed strong time- and concentration-dependent activity toward low-density cultures of the 2 strains (Figure 2). Low concentrations of RIF were needed to achieve >99% mycobacterial killing; differences between Beijing-1585 and EAI-1627 were minor (Table 2). However, to achieve 100% killing, especially for Beijing-1585, RIF concentrations had to be increased substantially (Table 2). Compared with the low-density culture for Beijing-1585, a substantial increase in RIF concentrations was needed to achieve 100% killing of the high-density culture (Table 2). This finding may be relevant in the clinical context because high-density mycobacteria populations are expected to exist in infected tissues of TB patients.

RIF-resistant mutants did not emerge in low-density cultures of Beijing-1585 and EAI-1627. However, RIF-resistant mutants were selected at relatively high numbers from high-density Beijing-1585 cultures compared with high-density EAI-1627 cultures. In Beijing-1585 cultures, exposure to RIF concentrations of 2–32 mg/L selected resistant mutants only; this was not observed in EAI-1627 cultures. Analysis of RIF-resistant Beijing mutants showed the following altered rpoB gene sequences: CAC→GAC (H526D), CAC→TAC (H526Y), and TCG→TTG (S531L), as assessed by using the GenoType MTBDRplus (Hain Lifescience, Nehren, Germany) assay (for details, see the Technical Appendix [PDF - 72 KB - 4 pages]).

For 3 of the 4 anti-TB drugs, the difference in the range of mutant prevention concentrations for the Beijing and EAI genotype strains was small: INH, 128–256 mg/L; RIF, 256–1,024 mg/L; and MXF, 2–8 mg/L. The mutant prevention concentration for AMK was >1,024 mg/L for all strains tested.

Conclusions

We showed that the currently used anti-TB drug susceptibility assays do not discriminate between the in vitro susceptibility, as determined by the methods used in this study, of the M. tuberculosis Beijing and EAI genotype strains. We also showed that the determination of mutation frequencies might be more informative than results of anti-TB drug susceptibility assays. For RIF, mutation frequencies in Beijing genotype strains were high compared with those in EAI genotype strains, and the selection of RIF-resistant mutants among Beijing strains, but not EAI strains, occurred within a wide range of RIF concentrations. In addition, the killing capacity of RIF toward the Beijing genotype is dependent on the density of mycobacteria: high concentrations of RIF are required to achieve 100% killing of high-density Beijing genotype populations but not of high-density EAI genotype populations. These in vitro characteristics might contribute to the less favorable treatment outcome of Beijing genotype TB infections and their significant association with drug resistance. Our findings demonstrate the need for anti-TB drug treatments that will prevent resistance among M. tuberculosis Beijing genotype TB cases, and they suggest that the development of genotype-specific TB therapy might be justified.

Dr de Steenwinkel is a medical doctor, resident in training for medical microbiologist, and a PhD student in clinical microbiology and antimicrobial therapy at Erasmus University Medical Center. His interests include research on improving therapy for TB and fundamental exploration of resistance formation.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge RIVM for technical assistance and the National Institute of Hygiene and Epidemiology, Hanoi, Vietnam, and the Pham Ngoc Thach Tuberculosis and Lung Disease Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, for sharing their M. tuberculosis isolates.

Financial support was provided by Erasmus University Medical Center and RIVM.

References

  1. World Health Organization. Multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB (M/XDR-TB): 2010 global report on surveillance and response: 2010 global report on surveillance and response. 2010 Mar [cited 2011 Jun 11]. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/2010/978924599191/en/index.html
  2. European Concerted Action on New Generation Genetic Markers and Techniques for the Epidemiology and Control of Tuberculosis. Beijing/W genotype Mycobacterium tuberculosis and drug resistance. Emerg Infect Dis. 2006;12:73643. DOIPubMed
  3. Parwati I, van Crevel R, van Soolingen D. Possible underlying mechanisms for successful emergence of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype strains. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10:10311. DOIPubMed
  4. Buu TN, Huyen MN, Lan NN, Quy HT, Hen NV, Zignol M, Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotype and case notification rates, rural Vietnam, 2003–2006. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:15707.PubMed
  5. Buu TN, Huyen MN, Lan NT, Quy HT, Hen NV, Zignol M, The Beijing genotype is associated with young age and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in rural Vietnam. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2009;13:9006.PubMed
  6. van der Spuy GD, Kremer K, Ndabambi SL, Beyers N, Dunbar R, Marais BJ, Changing Mycobacterium tuberculosis population highlights clade-specific pathogenic characteristics. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2009;89:1205. DOIPubMed
  7. Anh DD, Borgdorff MW, Van LN, Lan NT, van Gorkom T, Kremer K, Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype emerging in Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis. 2000;6:3025. DOIPubMed
  8. Cowley D, Govender D, February B, Wolfe M, Steyn L, Evans J, Recent and rapid emergence of W-Beijing strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;47:12529. DOIPubMed
  9. Lan NT, Lien HT. Tung le B, Borgdorff MW, Kremer K, van Soolingen D. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype and risk for treatment failure and relapse, Vietnam. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:16335.PubMed
  10. Hershberg R, Lipatov M, Small PM, Sheffer H, Niemann S, Homolka S, High functional diversity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis driven by genetic drift and human demography. PLoS Biol. 2008;6:e311. DOIPubMed
  11. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Susceptibility testing of mycobacteria, nocardiae, and other aerobic actinomycetes; approved standard—second edition. CLSI document M24-A; 2011 [cited 2011 Feb 11]. http://www.clsi.org/source/orders/free/m24-a2.pdf
  12. Gumbo T. New susceptibility breakpoints for first-line antituberculosis drugs based on antimicrobial pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic science and population pharmacokinetic variability. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54:148491. DOIPubMed
  13. Ebrahimi-Rad M, Bifani P, Martin C, Kremer K, Samper S, Rauzier J, Mutations in putative mutator genes of Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains of the W-Beijing family. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9:83845.PubMed
  14. Werngren J. Hoffner SE. Drug-susceptible Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype does not develop mutation-conferred resistance to rifampin at an elevated rate. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:15204. DOIPubMed
  15. de Steenwinkel JE, de Knegt GJ, ten Kate MT, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, Kremer K, Time-kill kinetics of anti-tuberculosis drugs, and emergence of resistance, in relation to metabolic activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2010;65:25829. DOIPubMed

Figures

Tables

Technical Appendix

Suggested citation for this article: de Steenwinkel JEM, ten Kate MT, de Knegt GJ, Kremer K, Aarnoutse RE, Boeree MJ, et al. Drug susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Beijing genotype, association with MDR TB. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2012 Apr (date cited). http://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid1804.110912

DOI: 10.3201/eid1804.110912

Table of Contents – Volume 18, Number 4—April 2012

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Jurriaan E.M. de Steenwinkel, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands


character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

TOP