Adriana V. Diaz, Christopher L. Netherton, Linda K. Dixon, and Anthony J. Wilson
Author affiliations: The Royal Veterinary College, London, United Kingdom (A.V. Diaz); Institute for Animal Health, Pirbright, Surrey, United Kingdom (A.V. Diaz, C.L. Netherton, L.K. Dixon, A.J. Wilson)
Figure. . . Predicted regression for each isolate–dose combination is shown. A) Ticks fed on African swine fever virus (ASFV) strain OUR T88/1 at 4 log10 50% hemadsorbing doses (HAD50)/mL. B) Ticks fed on ASFV strain OUR T88/1 at 6 log10 HAD50/mL. C) Ticks fed on ASFV strain Georgia 2007/1 at 4 log10 HAD50/mL. D) Ticks fed on ASFV strain Georgia 2007/1 at 6 log10 HAD50/mL. Crosses indicate experimental results, and solid line indicates model prediction. Dashed horizontal lines show the limits of the tissue culture sensitivity (lower limit 1.8 log10 HAD50 and upper limit 9.8 log10 HAD50).
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.