Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 18, Number 9—September 2012

Dispatch

Demographic Shift of Influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 during and after Pandemic, Rural India

Shobha BroorComments to Author , Wayne Sullender, Karen Fowler, Vivek Gupta, Marc-Alain Widdowson, Anand Krishnan, and Renu B. Lal
Author affiliations: All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India (S. Broor, A. Kirshnan); University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama, USA (W. Sullender, K. Fowler); The Inclen Trust International, New Delhi (V. Gupta); and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (M.-A. Widdowson, R.B. Lal)

Main Article

Figure 1

Monthly trends of positive influenza test results during active surveillance in a community-based study, rural India, November 2009–October 2010. Of 1,409 positive test results, 748 (53.1%) were for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, 642 (45.6%) for influenza B, 18 (1.3%) for influenza A (H3N2), and 1 for co-infection with influenza B and A(H1N1)pdm09. Children 6 months–10 years of age received trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (intervention) or inactivated polio vaccine (control) during November–Decemb

Figure 1. . . Monthly trends of positive influenza test results during active surveillance in a community-based study, rural India, November 2009–October 2010. Of 1,409 positive test results, 748 (53.1%) were for influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, 642 (45.6%) for influenza B, 18 (1.3%) for influenza A (H3N2), and 1 for co-infection with influenza B and A(H1N1)pdm09. Children 6 months–10 years of age received trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine (intervention) or inactivated polio vaccine (control) during November–December 2009; coverage was 92%.

Main Article

TOP