Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 19, Number 4—April 2013
Letter

Serosurvey of Dogs for Human, Livestock, and Wildlife Pathogens, Uganda

Javier MillánComments to Author , Andrea D. Chirife, Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka, Oscar Cabezón, Jesús Muro, Ignasi Marco, Florence Cliquet, Luis León-Vizcaíno, Marine Wasniewski, Sonia Almería, and Lawrence Mugisha
Author affiliations: Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Spain (J. Millán, A.D. Chirife, O. Cabezón, I. Marco, S. Almería); Conservation through Public Health, Kampala, Uganda (G. Kalema-Zikusoka); Ministry of Agriculture, Andorra la Vella, Andorra (J. Muro); Nancy Laboratory for Rabies and Wildlife, Malzéville, France (F. Cliquet, M. Wasniewski); University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain (L. León-Vizcaíno); Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal, Bellaterra, Spain (S. Almería); Makerere University, Kampala (L. Mugisha); Conservation and Ecosystem Health Alliance, Kampala (L. Mugisha)

Main Article

Table

Methodology and seroprevalence for selected pathogens in rural dogs in 3 national parks, Uganda, 2011*

Pathogen Test, cutoff value, and ref or kit National park
All 3 parks
Queen Elizabeth†
Bwindi Impenetrable‡
Mgahinga Gorilla§
Sample size Prevalence, % (95% CI) Sample size Prevalence, % (95% CI) Sample size Prevalence, % (95% CI) Sample size Prevalence, % (95% CI)
Rabies virus¶ FAVN, 0.24 IU/mL (4) 101 19.8 (12.7–28.6) 23 21.7 (9.0–43.3) 56 19.6 (11.0–32.0) 22 16.7 (5.9–37.2)
CDV c-ELISA, Ingezim Moquillo IgG# 92 100.0 (95.9–100) 30 100 (88.8–100.0) 39 100 (91.4–100.0) 23 100 (85.4–100.0)
CPV c-ELISA, Ingezim CPV# 92 65.2 (54.9–74.5) 26 80.8 (61.7–92.1) 43 76.7 (61.7–87.6) 23 26.1 (12.0–47.8)
Leptospira interrogans** MAT, 1:200 (15) 105 26.7 (19.0–36.1) 27 25.9 (12.4–46.2) 55 29.1 (17.9–42.7) 23 21.7 (9.0–43.3)
Leishmania sp.†† c-ELISA, Ingezim Leishmania# 92 19.6 (12.3–29.2) 26 19.2 (7.9–38.3) 43 25.6 (14.6–40.6) 23 8.7 (1.6–27.8)
Toxoplasma gondii MAT, 1:25 (3) 109 90.8 (83.6–95.1) 30 90.0 (73.7–97.2) 56 98.2 (90.5–99.9) 23 73.9 (52.2–88.0)
Neospora caninum c-ELISA, 30% (3) 109 27.5 (19.6–36.6) 30 26.7 (13.1–45.0) 56 32.1 (21.2–45.5) 23 30.4 (14.5–52.2)

*Ref, reference; FAVN, fluorescent antibody virus neutralization; CPV, canine parvovirus; c-ELISA, competitive ELISA; CDV, canine distemper virus; MAT, modified agglutination test.
†0°12′ S, 30°0′ E (savannah).
‡1°0′ S, 29°42′ E (tropical forest).
§1°16′ S, 29°40′ E (tropical forest).
¶Four dogs vaccinated against rabies in Queen Elizabeth are not included in these results.
#Manufactured by Ingenasa, Madrid, Spain.
**Fourteen serovars were investigated. Of the dogs seropositive, 71.5% were seropositive to 1 serovar and 28.5% to 2 serovars. Reacting serovars were Icterohaemorragiae (42.8% of positive dogs), Canicola (39.2%), Pyrogenes (21.4%), Tarassovi (10.7%), and Gryppothiposa and Australis (7.2% each).
††Antibodies probably correspond to contact with Leishmania donovani.

Main Article

References
  1. Baker  PJ, Soulsbury  CD, Iossa  G, Harris  S. Domestic cat (Felis catus) and domestic dog (Canis familiaris). In: Gehrt SD, Riley SPD, Cypher BL, editors. Urban carnivores: ecology, conflict, and conservation. Baltimore (MD): The John Hopkins University Press; 2010. p. 157–72.
  2. Butler  JRA, Bingham  J. Demography and dog–human relationships of the dog population in Zimbabwean communal lands. Vet Rec. 2000;147:4426 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Cabezón  O, Millán  J, Gomis  M, Dubey  JP, Ferroglio  E, Almería  S. Kennel dogs as sentinels of Leishmania infantum, Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum in Majorca Island, Spain. Parasitol Res. 2010;107:15058 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Mebatsion  T, Sillero-Zubiri  C, Gottelli  D, Cox  JH. Detection of rabies antibody by ELISA and RFFIT in unvaccinated dogs and in the endangered Simien jackal (Canis simensis) of Ethiopia. Journal of Veterinary Medicine Series B. 1992;39:2335 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Zhang  YZ, Fu  ZF, Wang  DM, Zhou  JZ, Wang  ZX, Lv  TF, Investigation of the role of healthy dogs as potential carriers of rabies virus. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:31320 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cleaveland  S, Appel  MGJ, Chalmers  WSK, Chillingworth  C, Kaare  M, Dye  C. Serological and demographic evidence for domestic dogs as a source of canine distemper virus infection for Serengeti wildlife. Vet Microbiol. 2000;72:21727 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Evangelista  KV, Coburn  J. Leptospira as an emerging pathogen, a review of its biology, pathogenesis and host immune responses. Future Microbiol. 2010;5:141325 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kolaczinski  JH, Reithinger  R, Worku  DT, Ocheng  A, Kasimiro  J, Kabatereine  N, Risk factors of visceral leishmaniasis in east Africa, a case-control study in Pokot territory of Kenya and Uganda. Int J Epidemiol. 2008;37:34452 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cliquet  F, Sagne  L, Schereffer  JL, Aubert  MF. ELISA test for rabies antibody titration in orally vaccinated foxes sampled in the fields. Vaccine. 2000;18:32729 and. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dikken  H, Kmety  E. Serological typing methods of leptospires. Methods Microbiol. 1978;11:259–307.

Main Article

Page created: March 15, 2013
Page updated: March 15, 2013
Page reviewed: March 15, 2013
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external