Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 21, Number 10—October 2015
Dispatch

Cross-sectional Serosurvey of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus IgG in Livestock, India, 2013–2014

Devendra T. MouryaComments to Author , Pragya D. Yadav, Anita M. Shete, Padmakar S. Sathe, Prasad Sarkale, Bramhadev Pattnaik, Gaurav Sharma, Kamlesh J. Upadhyay, Surekha Gosavi, Deepak Y. Patil, Gouri Chaubal, Triparna D. Majumdar, and Vishwa M. Katoch
Author affiliations: National Institute of Virology, Pune, India (D.T. Mourya, P.D. Yadav, A.M. Shete, P.S. Sathe, P.C. Sarkale, S. Gosavi, D.Y. Patil, G.Y. Chaubal, T.D. Majumdar); Project Directorate on Foot-and-Mouth Disease, Mukteswar, India (B. Pattnaik, G. Sharma); B.J. Medical Colleges, Ahmedabad, India (K.J. Upadhyay); Indian Council of Medical Research, Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Ansari Nagar, India (V.M. Katoch)

Main Article

Table

CCHFV IgG positivity detected in serum samples from bovines, sheep, and goats from 22 states and 1 union territory, India*

Location of center No. positive samples/no. samples tested (%)
Bovine Sheep and goat
Andhra Pradesh 30/233 (12.9)
Madhya Pradesh 7/150 (4.7) 3/40 (7.5)
Maharashtra 16/240 (6.7)
Punjab 6/198 (3.0)
Rajasthan 31/295 (10.5)
Orissa 31/99 (31.3)
Arunachal Pradesh 13/150 (8.7) 5/71 (7.0)
Karnataka 15/219 (6.8)
Kerala 5/200 (2.5) 5/219 (2.3)
West Bengal 13/357 (3.6)
Manipur 1/146 (0.7) 0/49
Mizoram 15/203 (7.4)
Tamil Nadu 6/379 (1.6)
Uttar Pradesh 7/195 (3.6)
Tripura 1/149 (0.7)
Guwahati 26/149 (17.0) 0/50
Haryana 3/200 (1.5)
Himachal Pradesh 1/150 (0.7) 26/49 (53.1)
Jammu and Kashmir 4/182 (2.2) 0/19
Nagaland 8/199 (4.0)
Andaman and Nicobar 2/308 (0.7) 21/98 (21.4)
Uttarakhand 2/100 (2.0)
Gujarat
17/280 (6.1)
34/260 (13.1)
Total 260/4,781 (5.43) 94/855 (10.99)

*CCHFV, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus; FMD, foot and mouth disease; −, no samples available for screening.

Main Article

Page created: September 22, 2015
Page updated: September 22, 2015
Page reviewed: September 22, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external