Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 7—July 2018
Dispatch

Guiana Dolphin Unusual Mortality Event and Link to Cetacean Morbillivirus, Brazil

Figures
Tables
Article Metrics
38
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil (K.R. Groch, J. Díaz-Delgado, J.L. Catão-Dias); Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (E.B. Santos-Neto, J.M.P. Ikeda, R.R. Carvalho, R.B. Oliveira, E.B. Guari, T.L. Bisi, A.F. Azevedo, J. Lailson-Brito)

Cite This Article

Abstract

During November–December 2017, a mass die-off of Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) began in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Molecular and pathologic investigations on 20 animals indicated that cetacean morbillivirus played a major role. Our findings increase the knowledge on health and disease aspects of this endangered species.

Cetacean morbillivirus (CeMV; family Paramyxoviridae) is a highly infectious pathogen responsible for numerous cetacean mass die-offs worldwide. Currently, there are 3 well-characterized strains (1), the porpoise morbillivirus, the dolphin morbillivirus, and the pilot whale morbillivirus, and 3 less-known strains, including the novel Guiana dolphin strain (GD)–CeMV, recently identified in a single specimen from Brazil (2). CeMV was detected in Ireland, England, and the Netherlands in 1988–1990 (3,4), when the porpoise morbillivirus strain was identified in a small number of stranded harbor porpoises (Phocoena phocoena). Since then, CeMV has been implicated as the causal agent of numerous outbreaks and also endemic, sporadic deaths involving multiple cetacean species throughout the North Sea, north Atlantic Ocean, Mediterranean Sea, Black Sea, Indian Ocean (Western Australia), and Pacific Ocean (Hawaii, Japan, and Australia) (1).

To date, no epizootics linked to CeMV causing the death of large numbers of marine mammals has been detected in the South Atlantic. A Guiana dolphin (Sotalia guianensis) stranded in Espírito Santo, Brazil, which tested positive for CeMV by reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) and immunohistochemistry, has been the only confirmed fatal case in South Atlantic cetaceans (2). We describe the results of pathologic and molecular investigations on 20 deceased Guiana dolphins in the onset of the ongoing unusual mortality event in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

The Study

During November–December 2017, a unusual mortality event involving 56 Guiana dolphins began in Ilha Grande Bay, Rio de Janeiro (Brazil; 23°4′45′′–23°13′38′′S, 44°5′30′′–44°22′28′′W). This area is a relatively well-preserved ecosystem, and Guiana dolphin population census size in this area was estimated at ≈900 animals (5). Stranding occurrence for the same period in previous years ranged from 0 to 3 specimens. During this event, carcasses were recovered adrift or washed ashore. We performed necropsies on 20/56 (37.7%) Guiana dolphins and recorded epidemiologic and biologic data (Table 1).

We collected representative tissue samples of major organs and fixed them in 10% neutral buffered formalin or froze them at −80°C. For PCR analysis, we extracted viral RNA from frozen lung, brain, spleen, liver, and kidney (Table 1) using Brazol Reagent (LGC Biotecnologia Ltda, São Paulo, Brazil), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We used random primers and M-MLV Reverse Transcription Kit (Invitrogen, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) to synthesize cDNA. We performed amplification using primers targeting highly conserved fragments of the phosphoprotein (P) gene (6) and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase protein coded by the L gene (primers RES-MOR-HEN) as previously described (2,7).

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic tree showing partial sequence of A) morbillivirus phosphoprotein and B) large protein genes of cetacean morbillivirus (CeMV) isolates found in stranded Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (bold), 2017, and those of other previously described morbilliviruses. Sendai virus was added as an outgroup. Trees were generated by the maximum-likelihood method (A) and neighbor-joining method (B); bootstrap values (1,000 replicates) are indicated at the

Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree showing partial sequence of A) morbillivirus phosphoprotein and B) large protein genes of cetacean morbillivirus (CeMV) isolates found in stranded Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis) from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil...

We detected CeMV genome in 15/20 (75%) animals for the P gene and 6/6 (100%) animals for the L gene. We sequenced amplified products and compared them with sequences of CeMV using blastn (http://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). We obtained identical sequences for the L gene, and 2 sequences with variation in 1 nucleotide position for the P gene. Sequencing of 405-bp amplified fragments of the CeMV P gene revealed 99%–100% identity to GD-CeMV (2) and 78%–82% identity with other CeMV strains. A 443-bp amplified fragment of the CeMV L gene revealed 74%–75% identity to CeMV and other morbillivirus species. Partial P and L gene sequencing and analysis using MEGA7 (http://megasoftware.net/) corroborate that the GD-CeMV strain differed from other morbilliviruses and represented a distinct lineage (Figure 1).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Cetacean morbillivirus–associated histopathologic findings in 2 Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis), a female adult (case 1, panels A–C) and a male calf (case 2, panels D–E) A) The mammary gland parenchyma is focally disrupted by lymphohistiocytic inflammatory cells (not visible at this magnification) associated with collapsed and lost acini, and mild fibrosis (asterisks). Original magnification ×40; hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stain. B) Swollen and degenerating mammary acinar

Figure 2. Cetacean morbillivirus–associated histopathologic findings in 2 Guiana dolphins (Sotalia guianensis), a female adult (case 1, panels A–C) and a male calf (case 2, panels D–E). A) The mammary gland parenchyma is...

For histologic examination, we embedded formalin-fixed tissues in paraffin wax, processed them as routine, and stained them with hematoxylin and eosin. We recorded detailed histopathologic findings of 6 animals positive for CeMV by RT-PCR (Table 2). One specimen had lesions consistent with CeMV infection, including marked multifocal, subacute bronchointerstitial pneumonia with type II pneumocyte hyperplasia, syncytia, and scattered intraepithelial, intranuclear, and intracytoplasmic inclusion bodies (INCIBs); mild to moderate multifocal histiocytic and lymphoplasmacytic mastitis with necrosis and epithelial INCIBs (Figure 2, panels A–C); and multicentric lymphoid depletion. In addition, most animals had moderate to severe verminous bronchopneumonia and pleuritis with morphologic evidence of pulmonary arterial hypertension, multicentric eosinophilic and necrotizing lymphadenitis, and chronic aortic endarteritis by adult nematodes and pulmonary endarteritis by migrating larval nematodes histomorphologically compatible with Halocercus brasiliensis (8). Other common findings included moderate to poor body condition and lack of ingesta with small amounts of feces. Two (10%) of the 20 animals (which were negative for CeMV by RT-PCR) showed typical external net markings and multiorgan acute hemodynamic alterations (congestion, edema, and hemorrhage) supporting asphyxia due to bycatch as the cause of death.

We performed immunohistochemistry studies using a monoclonal antibody against the nucleoprotein antigen of canine distemper virus (CDV-NP mAb; VMRD Inc. Pullman, WA, USA), as described (2). In lung tissue sections (cases 1, 2, 11, and 13), we evaluated number and distribution of immunopositive cells and immunolabeling intensity. Lung samples from all animals tested showed widespread and intense immunolabeling in bronchial, bronchiolar, and alveolar epithelium, alveolar macrophages, and syncytia (Figure 2, panels D,E).

In this investigation, typical histopathologic findings consistent with CeMV were evident in 1 animal, indicating a systemic infection. Although chronic bronchointerstitial pneumonia and multicentric lymphoid depletion observed in most animals are common findings in CeMV-infected cetaceans, these lesions were considerably overlapped by H. brasiliensis endoparasitosis. The pathologic signatures of GD-CeMV remain unknown. No other CeMV strain has been described in the South Atlantic Ocean. In subacute and chronic CeMV presentations, fatalities are often ascribed to secondary infections (e.g., toxoplasmosis, aspergillosis) (9,10). In our cohort, autolysis precluded microscopic examinations in some animals, so we could not draw further pathologic conclusions. Nonetheless, moderate to severe parasitosis by H. brasiliensis likely accounted for severe illness in most cases. Intense viral replication in the mammary acinar epithelium in a lactating female may imply a vertical transmission route, in addition to the horizontal aerogenous and direct contact routes (10). Therefore, future pathologic and epidemiologic studies in the South Atlantic should consider vertical transmission. Two cases from this cohort were bycaught, further supporting the multifactorial nature of the ongoing unusual mortality event.

The Guiana dolphin is a coastal and estuarine delphinid endemic from southern Brazil to Central America and one of the most threatened South Atlantic cetaceans, for which recent studies demonstrate severe population decline (11). Because of its near-shore distribution and site fidelity (12), the Guiana dolphin is susceptible to the effects of human activities (e.g., habitat degradation, chemical pollution, noise, and bycatch) (13). Many intricate and complex anthropic and natural factors interplay and modulate the decline of species. Human activities are by far the major threat and cause for decimation of cetacean populations (14); however, natural factors such as highly infectious pathogens, e.g., CeMV, may drive decimating events in susceptible hosts (15).

Conclusions

We provide compelling molecular and pathologic evidence associating GD-CeMV infection with the ongoing Guiana dolphin mass die-off near Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. As of January 2018, this event had resulted in the deaths of >200 Guiana dolphins in southern Rio de Janeiro state, and the deaths appeared to be extending southward. The environmental consequences and conservation effects, coupled with the anthropogenic threats, are expected to be dramatic. The factors underlying the die-off are being investigated, but our results indicate that GD-CeMV plays a major contributory role. Our findings increase the body of knowledge on health and disease aspects of this endangered species.

Dr. Groch is a postdoctoral fellow studying the advancement of pathology of cetaceans in Brazil, particularly of infectious diseases. Her current research focuses on determining geographic and host ranges for CeMV, as well as delineating the pathologic signature and CeMV strains present in cetaceans of Brazil.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank the Laboratório de Mamíferos Aquáticos e Bioindicadores (MAQUA/UERJ) team for their assistance in stranding monitoring and necropsy procedures and Haydée A. Cunha for helpful comments on the draft of this manuscript.

Programa de Conservação dos botos-cinza (Sotalia guianensis) e outros cetáceos das baías da Ilha Grande e de Sepetiba (MAQUA/UERJ, Associação Cultural e de Pesquisa Noel Rosa, INEA, Transpetro) and Projeto de Monitoramento de Praias da Bacia de Santos (PMP-BS) (MAQUA/UERJ, CTA Meio Ambiente, Instituto Boto Cinza, Petrobras) support cetacean research in this region. PMP-BS is a monitoring program demanded by the federal environmental licensing conducted by IBAMA. This research was also supported by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grants #2014/24932-2, #2015/00735-6, and #2017/02223-8. J.L.C. D. is the recipient of a fellowship from the National Research Council (CNPq; grant # 305349/2015-5); A.F.A., J.L-B., and T.L.B. are funded by research grants from CNPq (PQ-1D, PQ-1C, and PQ-2, respectively), FAPERJ (CNE and JCNE, respectively), and UERJ (Prociência).

Top

References

  1. Van Bressem  M-F, Duignan  PJ, Banyard  A, Barbieri  M, Colegrove  KM, De Guise  S, et al. Cetacean morbillivirus: current knowledge and future directions. Viruses. 2014;6:514581. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Groch  KR, Colosio  AC, Marcondes  MC, Zucca  D, Díaz-Delgado  J, Niemeyer  C, et al. Novel cetacean morbillivirus in Guiana dolphin, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:5113. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Kennedy  S, Smyth  JA, Cush  PF, McCullough  SJ, Allan  GM, McQuaid  S. Viral distemper now found in porpoises. Nature. 1988;336:21. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Visser  IK, Van Bressem  MF, de Swart  RL, van de Bildt  MW, Vos  HW, van der Heijden  RW, et al. Characterization of morbilliviruses isolated from dolphins and porpoises in Europe. J Gen Virol. 1993;74:63141. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Souza  SCP. Estimation of population parameters of the Guiana dolphin, Sotalia guianensis (Van Bénéden, 1864) (Cetacea, Delphinidae) in Paraty Bay (RJ). Rio de Janeiro (Brazil): Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro; 2013.
  6. Barrett  T, Visser  IKG, Mamaev  L, Goatley  L, van Bressem  M-F, Osterhaust  AD. Dolphin and porpoise morbilliviruses are genetically distinct from phocine distemper virus. Virology. 1993;193:10102. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Tong  S, Chern  SW, Li  Y, Pallansch  MA, Anderson  LJ. Sensitive and broadly reactive reverse transcription-PCR assays to detect novel paramyxoviruses. J Clin Microbiol. 2008;46:26528. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Delyamure  SL. Helminthofauna of marine mammals (ecology and phylogeny) [translated from Russian]. Jerusalem: Israel Program for Scientific Translation Ltd.; 1968.
  9. Stephens  N, Duignan  PJ, Wang  J, Bingham  J, Finn  H, Bejder  L, et al. Cetacean morbillivirus in coastal Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins, Western Australia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014;20:66670. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Domingo  M, Visa  J, Pumarola  M, Marco  AJ, Ferrer  L, Rabanal  R, et al. Pathologic and immunocytochemical studies of morbillivirus infection in striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba). Vet Pathol. 1992;29:110. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Azevedo  AF, Carvalho  RR, Kajin  M, Van Sluys  M, Bisi  TL, Cunha  HA, et al. The first confirmed decline of a delphinid population from Brazilian waters: 2000–2015 abundance of Sotalia guianensis in Guanabara Bay, South-eastern Brazil. Ecol Indic. 2017;79:110. DOIGoogle Scholar
  12. Flores  PAC, Silva  VMFD. Tucuxi and Guiana dolphin: Sotalia fluviatilis and S. guianensis. In: Perrin WF, Wursig B, Thewissen JGM, editors. Encyclopedia of marine mammals, 2nd ed. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 2009. p. 1188–92.
  13. Crespo  EA, Notarbartolo di Sciara  G, Reeves  RR, Smith  BD. Dolphins, whales, and porpoises: 2002–2010 conservation action plan for the world’s cetaceans. Gland (Switzerland) and Cambridge: International Union for Conservation of Nature; 2003.
  14. Ceballos  G, Ehrlich  PR, Barnosky  AD, García  A, Pringle  RM, Palmer  TM. Accelerated modern human-induced species losses: Entering the sixth mass extinction. Sci Adv. 2015;1:e1400253. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Forcada  J, Aguilar  A, Hammond  PS, Pastor  X, Aguilar  R. Distribution and numbers of striped dolphins in the western Mediterranean Sea after the 1990 epizootic outbreak. Mar Mamm Sci. 1994;10:13750. DOIGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2407.180139

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 7—July 2018

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Kátia R. Groch, Wildlife Comparative Pathology Laboratory, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of São Paulo, Av Prof. Orlando Marques de Paiva, 87 São Paulo, SP, 05508-270, Brazil

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: June 18, 2018
Page updated: June 18, 2018
Page reviewed: June 18, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external