Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 11—November 2019
Research Letter

Mutation and Diversity of Diphtheria Toxin in Corynebacterium ulcerans

Figures
Article Metrics
5
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan

Cite This Article

Abstract

Corynebacterium ulcerans infection is emerging in humans. We conducted phylogenetic analyses of C. ulcerans and C. diptheriae, which revealed diverse diphtheria toxin in C. ulcerans. Diphtheria toxin diversification could decrease effectiveness of diphtheria toxoid vaccine and diphtheria antitoxin for preventing and treating illnesses caused by this bacterium.

Corynebacterium ulcerans is a rod-shaped, aerobic, gram-positive bacterium closely related to C. diphtheria. Some strains of C. ulcerans can produce diphtheria toxin, which causes respiratory diphtheria in humans and animals. Reports of human infections with C. ulcerans have increased during the past 20 years, and C. ulcerans is a recognized emerging human pathogen (1). Humans can contract toxin-producing C. ulcerans from companion animals (2,3). Human death can occur if appropriate treatment is delayed (4). Non–toxin-producing C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans can convert to toxin-producing strains through a process of lysogeny with diphtheria toxin gene–carrying corynebacteriophages (57). Although increased coverage of the diphtheria toxoid vaccine has reduced the frequency of C. diphtheriae infections, reports of C. ulcerans infections in humans are increasing.

A report evaluating the differences in the amino acid sequences of the diphtheria toxins in C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans used only limited data, comparing 1 strain of C. diphtheriae against 2 strains of C. ulcerans (8), leaving the differences among the toxins of these 2 species unclear. Others have conducted bacterial genome analyses and deposited several genomic sequences of C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans strains into a public database. We collected amino acid sequences of the diphtheria toxin and the nucleic acid sequences of the 16S rRNA gene of 6 C. diphtheriae strains and 6 C. ulcerans strains from the National Center for Biotechnology Information genome database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome). Then, we performed phylogenetic analyses by using MEGA 7.0 (https://www.megasoftware.net).

Figure

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences (A) and amino acid sequences (B) of diphtheria toxin genes of 6 Coynebacterium ulcerans strains and 6 C. ulcerans strains. All strains had the diphtheria toxin gene; whole-genome analysis data are available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome). We generated phylogenetic trees by using the maximum-likelihood method in MEGA 7.0 (https://www.megasoftware.net). 16S rRNA

Figure. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene sequences (A) and amino acid sequences (B) of diphtheria toxin genes of 6 Coynebacterium ulcerans strains and 6 C. ulcerans strains. All strains had...

We found that the 16S rRNA gene sequences divided into separate C. diphtheriae and C. ulcerans strains with some sequence variability among the strains in each species (Figure, panel A). The amino acid sequences of the toxins also divided into separate clades for each species. However, we noted that C. diphtheriae strains were identical, but C. ulcerans strains were diverse (Figure, panel B), suggesting that C. ulcerans tends to acquire mutations more frequently than C. diphtheriae. Two possible explanations for this phenomenon are that C. ulcerans is maintained by various animals, increasing its diversity compared with C. diphtheria, which is believed to infect only humans; or that C. ulcerans has a phage-independent pathway to acquire the diphtheria toxin–encoding gene, as reported (9).

Most severe human cases of disease caused by toxigenic C. ulcerans have occurred in unvaccinated or inadequately vaccinated persons. However, a fatal case was reported in a person who received a diphtheria vaccination booster ≈10 years before disease onset (10). Diversification of the C. ulcerans diphtheria toxin gene is of note because accumulation of these gene mutations potentially could lead to decreased effectiveness of the diphtheria toxoid vaccine for prevention and diphtheria antitoxin for treatment of toxigenic C. ulcerans disease.

Dr. Otsuji is an assistant professor of intensive care medicine at the University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Kitakyushu, Japan. His research interests are critical care and microbiology, including zoonotic infections and microbiota.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Christopher Carman for his valuable editorial advice on the manuscript.

Top

References

  1. Hacker  E, Antunes  CA, Mattos-Guaraldi  AL, Burkovski  A, Tauch  A. Corynebacterium ulcerans, an emerging human pathogen. Future Microbiol. 2016;11:1191208. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Katsukawa  C, Komiya  T, Umeda  K, Goto  M, Yanai  T, Takahashi  M, et al. Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans isolated from a hunting dog and its diphtheria toxin antibody titer. Microbiol Immunol. 2016;60:17786. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Katsukawa  C, Komiya  T, Yamagishi  H, Ishii  A, Nishino  S, Nagahama  S, et al. Prevalence of Corynebacterium ulcerans in dogs in Osaka, Japan. J Med Microbiol. 2012;61:26673. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Otsuji  K, Fukuda  K, Endo  T, Shimizu  S, Harayama  N, Ogawa  M, et al. The first fatal case of Corynebacterium ulcerans infection in Japan. JMM Case Rep. 2017;4:e005106. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Freeman  VJ. Studies on the virulence of bacteriophage-infected strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae. J Bacteriol. 1951;61:67588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sekizuka  T, Yamamoto  A, Komiya  T, Kenri  T, Takeuchi  F, Shibayama  K, et al. Corynebacterium ulcerans 0102 carries the gene encoding diphtheria toxin on a prophage different from the C. diphtheriae NCTC 13129 prophage. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:72. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sangal  V, Hoskinsson  PA. Corynephages: infections of the infectors. In: Burkovski A, editor. Diphtheria and its etiological agents. Dordrecht (the Netherlands): Springer; 2014. p. 67–82.
  8. Sing  A, Hogardt  M, Bierschenk  S, Heesemann  J. Detection of differences in the nucleotide and amino acid sequences of diphtheria toxin from Corynebacterium diphtheriae and Corynebacterium ulcerans causing extrapharyngeal infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41:484851. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Meinel  DM, Margos  G, Konrad  R, Krebs  S, Blum  H, Sing  A. Next generation sequencing analysis of nine Corynebacterium ulcerans isolates reveals zoonotic transmission and a novel putative diphtheria toxin-encoding pathogenicity island. Genome Med. 2014;6:113. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Vandentorren  S, Guiso  N, Badell  E, Boisrenoult  P, Micaelo  M, Troché  G, et al. Toxigenic Corynebacterium ulcerans in a fatal human case and her feline contacts, France, March 2014. Euro Surveill. 2014;19:20910. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figure

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2511.181455

Original Publication Date: September 26, 2019

Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 11—November 2019

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Ken Otsuji, University of Occupational and Environmental Health Japan, Microbiology, 1–1 Iseigaoka, Yahatanishi-ku, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: October 15, 2019
Page updated: October 15, 2019
Page reviewed: October 15, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external