Volume 3, Number 1—March 1997
Risk Factors for Severe Leptospirosis in the Parish of St. Andrew, Barbados
To the Editor: Leptospirosis, an important zoonosis in most warm-climate areas, is endemic in most Caribbean countries (1). The disease was first reported in Barbados 60 years ago (2), and since 1979 has been the subject of continual study as the result of the establishment of the Leptospira Laboratory by the governments of Barbados and the United Kingdom. The annual incidence of severe leptospirosis in Barbados over the past 17 years has been approximately 11.5 cases per 100,000 population with a death rate of 13%. However, the incidence rate varies in the parishes of Barbados. For the 12-year period from 1979 to 1991, the lowest incidence rates were in St. Peter (9.5 cases per 100,000 population) and St. Michael (9.9 cases per 100,000 population), while the highest was in St. Andrew (40 cases per 100,000 population). This greater than fourfold difference in incidence rates has been attributed to differences in rainfall (3). We performed a retrospective case-control study to determine what other factors were important.
We identified cases of leptospirosis from the records of the Leptospira Laboratory and included them in the study if they occurred from January 1980 to December 1993, if the home address was in the Parish of St. Andrew, and if laboratory evidence of leptospirosis was confirmed by one or more of the following: an IgM ELISA titer ³160 in a single sample, a titer in the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) of ³800 in a single sample, a fourfold or greater rise in antibody titer between two samples tested by the same method, or isolation of leptospires from blood or urine cultures (3).
Of the 36 cases of laboratory-confirmed leptospirosis and 41 controls (selected for residence close to the case-patient), 22 patients and 38 controls were included in the study. For case-patients, the mean age at onset of symptoms was 30.8 years (range 8 to 73 years); 28 (78%) of 36 cases occurred in males. The mean age of controls was 31.3 years (range 13 to 78 years); 15 (39.5%) of 38 controls were male. Controls were matched for age, but because St. Andrew is a sparsely populated parish, and because the survey was conducted during the day, it was difficult to recruit sufficient male controls. The participants were administered a questionnaire, and blood samples were taken and tested for leptospiral antibodies. Serologic results were compared with the results obtained for each of the patients during their acute illness and with the results of previous followup studies conducted over several years.
Gardening was a significant risk factor (odds ratio [OR] 4.57, 95% confidence level [CL] 1.09-20.36) and appeared to remain so whether gloves were worn or not, as was the presence of dogs around the home (OR 7.82, 95% CL 1.79-46.55). With few exceptions, the respondents kept dogs, and these animals are an important risk factor for leptospirosis in Barbados (6). A positive association was observed between illness and wearing boots in the garden or yard (OR 8.5, 95% CL 1.93-42.55), but this may be because case patients had changed their behavior since recovery, because they were working in wetter areas than the controls, or because the male/female ratio was lower among controls. We were unable to define the odds ratios for walking barefoot some or all of the time because none of the controls admitted to going barefoot. The most important risk factor we identified was walking through ponds or stagnant water (OR 25.62, 95% CL 2.89-1151.84). Flooding is common during the rainy season in Barbados, and people living in rural areas such as St. Andrew are often exposed in this way. These risk factors bear a striking resemblance to those identified in the outbreak in Nicaragua a few months after our study (7).
We conclude that almost all of the patients had multiple risk factors for leptospiral infection. Few indicated a change in lifestyle since recovering from leptospirosis. Serologic evidence of recent reexposure to leptospirosis was detected in two (17%) of 12 case-patients.
The relatively high rainfall in St. Andrew may have contributed to their risk for leptospirosis by enhancing the survival of leptospires in the soil and water. The incidence of leptospirosis in St. Andrew shows a close association with mean monthly rainfall, the highest incidence during the period studied being October and November. However, when individual cases were examined, a less strong correlation was observed between onset of symptoms and rainfall in the preceding month and with rainfall in the preceding 3-month period. No evidence was observed of clustering of cases in months or years with rainfall above the mean. Similar findings have been reported for the island as a whole (4,5). The incidence of leptospirosis appeared to lag behind the rainfall, since rainfall tended to increase from June to a peak in November, while leptospirosis incidence increased from August to November. There was a marked decrease in rainfall in December each year, with the dry season continuing until May. However, continuing low incidence of leptospirosis was seen throughout the less wet months, until during the months of May to July only one case occurred during the study period.
On the basis of these findings, we conclude that the ground remains sufficiently damp during the period from December through the early months of the year for leptospires to survive. As the middle months of the year are reached, the ground may become too dry for leptospires to survive. This would also account for the apparent lag between the onset of the rainy season and the rise in leptospirosis incidence, as the ground may take some weeks of consistent rainfall to become saturated.
No clustering of cases in time was observed, which confirms that leptospirosis in Barbados is endemic and that increases in incidence result from multiple sporadic cases rather than microepidemics (5).Cases were clustered geographically, but this may have been an artifact resulting from variation in population density. Moreover, the place of residence is not necessarily the place of exposure to leptospirosis.
We emphasize the importance of public education regarding the relative risks, as a means of preventing exposure, and of continuing education of physicians and primary healthcare workers to raise their awareness of the seasonal distribution and early symptoms of leptospirosis.
We thank Mr. J. Charlery (Meteorological Department) for supplying the rainfall data and Ms. C. Whittington and Ms. S. Branch (Leptospira Laboratory) for their technical assistance.
- Everard JD, Everard COR. Leptospirosis in the Caribbean. Reviews in Medical Microbiology. 1993;4:114–22.
- Bayley HH. An investigation of the infectious jaundice of Barbados. Caribb Med J. 1939;1:135–42.
- Everard COR, Edwards CN, Everard JD, Carrington DG. A twelve-year study of leptospirosis on Barbados. Eur J Epidemiol. 1995;11:311–20.
- Everard COR, Bennett S, Edwards CN, Nicholson GD, Hassell TA, Carrington DG, An investigation of some risk factors for severe leptospirosis on Barbados. J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;95:13–22.
- Bennett S, Everard COR. Absence of epidemicity of severe leptospirosis in Barbados. Epidemiol Infect. 1991;106:151–6.
- Everard COR, Jones CJ, Innis VA, Carrington DG, Vaughan AW. Leptospirosis in dogs on Barbados. Israel Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 1987;43:288–95.
- Spiegel RA, Ashford DA, Trevejo RT, Rigau-Perez JG, McClure EM, Amador JJ, Leptospirosis outbreak associated with pulmonary hemorrhage--Nicaragua, 1996. Abstracts of the First Meeting of the International Leptospirosis Society; 1996 Sept; Nantes, France. Nance, France: International Leptospirosis Society, 1996.
Suggested citation: Douglin CP, Jordan C. Rock R, Hurley A and Levett PN. Risk Factors for Severe Leptospirosis in the Parish of St. Andrew, Barbados [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 1997, Mar [date cited]. Available from http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/3/1/97-0114
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: December 21, 2010
- Page last updated: December 21, 2010
- Page last reviewed: December 21, 2010
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)