Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 3, Number 3—September 1997
Perspective

Resistance, Remission, and Qualitative Differences in HIV Chemotherapy

Denise E. Kirschner*Comments to Author  and G.F. Webb
Author affiliations: *University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA; and †Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Main Article

Figure 3

Treatment simulations for four starting viral levels. The simulations have a common viral set-point of disease progression, and the treatment starting values are from Figure 1a,b. For all four simulations, the treatment parameters are c1=2.0, c2=1.0, c3=.1, the resistance mutation parameter is q=10-7, and the threshold value is V0=.5 (indicated by the horizontal line). The lowest starting viral level achieves remission (a), while the other three develop resistance.

Figure 3. Treatment simulations for four starting viral levels. The simulations have a common viral set-point of disease progression, and the treatment starting values are from Figure 1a,b. For all four simulations, the treatment parameters are c1=2.0, c2=1.0, c3=.1, the resistance mutation parameter is q=10-7, and the threshold value is V0=.5 (indicated by the horizontal line). The lowest starting viral level achieves remission (a), while the other three develop resistance.

Main Article

Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external