Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 5, Number 6—December 1999
Synopsis

Antimicrobial Resistance with Streptococcus pneumoniae in the United States, 1997–98

Gary V. DoernComments to Author , Angela B. Brueggemann, Holly Huynh, Elizabeth Wingert, and Paul Rhomberg
Author affiliations: University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA

Main Article

Table 1

In vitro activity of 23 antimicrobial agents for 1,601 isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae

Antimicrobial agent Penicillin-susceptible strains (n = 1,127)
Penicillin-intermediate strains (n = 278)
MIC50 MIC90 MIC range % I % R MIC50 MIC90 MIC range % I % R
Penicillin 0.015 0.03 <0.004 - 0.06 -- -- 0.5 1 0.12 - 1 -- --
Amoxicillin 0.015 0.03 <0.004 - 0.12 0.0 0.0 0.5 2 0.015 - 4 34.5 14
Amox/clav 0.015 0.03 <0.004 - 0.12 0.0 0.0 0.5 2 0.015 - 4 31.7 16.9
Ceftriaxone 0.015 0.03 <0.008 - 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.5 1 0.015 - 4 20.1 0.7
Cefuroxime 0.03 0.12 <0.015 - 2 0.2 0.1 2 4 0.12 - 8 6.8 55.8
Cefpodoxime 0.03 0.06 <0.015 - 4 1 4 0.03 - 8 -- --
Cefprozil 0.06 0.12 <0.03 - 1 2 8 0.06 - 16
Cefixime 0.25 0.5 <0.06 - 16 8 16 0.25 - 32
Loracarbef 0.5 1 <0.06 - 4 16 128 0.25 - >128
Cefaclor 0.5 2 <0.06 - 2 8 64 0.12 - >128
Ceftibuten 4 8 <0.25 - >64 64 >64 4 - >64
Clarithromycin <0.03 <0.03 <0.03 - >64 0.5 5.2 <0.03 >64 <0.03 - >64 2.2 35.3
Erythromycin 0.06 0.06 <0.03 - >64 0.3 5.7 0.06 >64 <0.03 - >64 0.7 37.4
Azithromycin 0.06 0.12 <0.03 - >64 0.2 5.6 0.12 >64 <0.03 - >64 0.7 37.8
Clindamycin 0.06 0.06 <0.008 - >8 0.1 1.1 0.06 >8 <0.008 - 8 0.0 12.9
Trovafloxacin 0.06 0.12 0.015 - 8 0.0 0.2 0.06 0.12 0.015 - 0.25 0.0 0.0
Tetracycline 0.12 0.25 <0.03 - 64 0.2 2.5 0.25 32 <0.03 - >64 0.7 27.7
TMP/SMX 0.12 1 0.06 - 32 6.5 5.9 2 8 <0.03 - >32 19.8 42.4
Chloramphenicol 2 4 <0.5 - 16 0.8 4 16 <0.05 - 16 11.9
Rifampin <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 - 0.5 0.0 0.0 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 - 2 0.7 0.0
Linezolida 1 2 0.12 - 2 1 2 0.25 - 2
Quin/dalfo 0.25 0.5 0.06 - 8 0.0 0.2 0.25 0.5 0.06 - 1 0.0 0.0
Vancomycin 0.25 0.5 0.03 - 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.25 0.5 0.06 - 0.5 0.0 0.0




Antimicrobial Penicillin-resistant strains
(n = 196)
All strains
(n = 1,601)
agent
MIC50
MIC90
MIC range
% I
% R
MIC50
MIC90
MIC range
% I
% R
Penicillin 2 4 2 - 8 -- -- 0.015 2 <0.004 - 8 17.4 12.1
Amoxicillin 2 8 1 - 8 9.7 90.3 0.03 2 <0.004 - 8 7.2 13.5
Amox/clav 2 8 1 - 8 6.6 93.4 0.03 2 <0.004 - 8 6.3 14.4
Ceftriaxone 1 2 0.5 - 8 68.4 31.6 0.03 1 <0.008 - 8 10.9 4
Cefuroxime 4 8 2 - 32 0.0 100 0.03 4 <0.015 - 32 1.3 22
Cefpodoxime 4 8 1 - >32 -- -- 0.06 4 <0.05 - >32 --
Cefprozil 8 16 2 - 64 0.12 8 <0.03 - 64 --
Cefixime 32 64 2 - 128 0.25 16 <0.06 - 128 --
Loracarbef 128 >128 32 - >128 1 128 <0.06 - >128 --
Cefaclor 128 >128 16 - >128 0.5 64 <0.06 - >128 --
Ceftibuten >64 >64 <16 - >64 44 >64 <0.25 - >64
Clarithromycin 2 >64 <0.03 - >64 3.6 64.8 <0.03 4 <0.03 - >64 1.2 17.7
Erythromycin 4 >64 <0.03 - >64 0.5 68.4 0.06 8 <0.03 - >64 0.4 18.9
Azithromycin 8 >64 <0.03 - >64 1.5 67.3 0.12 16 <0.03 - >64 0.4 18.7
Clindamycin 0.06 >8 <0.008 - >8 0.5 21.4 0.06 0.06 <0.008 - >8 0.1 5.6
Trovafloxacin 0.06 0.12 0.03 - 4 0.5 0.5 0.06 0.12 0.015 - 8 0.1 0.2
Tetracycline 16 32 0.06 - 64 0.5 51.5 0.12 16 <0.03 - >64 0.3 12.9
TMP/SMX 4 16 0.06 - 32 21.9 71.9 0.25 4 <0.03 - 32 10.7 20.4
Chloramphenicol 4 16 <0.5 - >16 37.2 2 4 <0.5 - >16 7.2
Rifampin <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 - >4 0.0 0.5 <0.12 <0.12 <0.12 - >4 0.1 0.1
Linezolid 1 2 0.5 - 2 1 2 0.12 - 2 --
Quin/dalfo 0.25 0.5 0.12 1 0.0 0.0 0.25 0.5 0.06 - 8 0.0 0.1
Vancomycin 0.25 0.5 0.06 - 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.25 0.5 0.03 - 0.5 0.0 0.0

aBecause of the lack of NCCLS breakpoints for linezolid, resistance rates were not determined.
Amox/clav, amoxicillin/clavulanate; TMP/SMX, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; Quin/dalfo, quinupristin/dalfopristin.
MIC, minimum inhibitory concentration; I, intermediate resistance; R, resistant.

Main Article

Page created: December 15, 2010
Page updated: December 15, 2010
Page reviewed: December 15, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external