Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 4—August 2001
THEME ISSUE
West Nile Virus
West Nile Virus

West Nile Virus Surveillance in Connecticut in 2000: An Intense Epizootic without High Risk for Severe Human Disease

James Hadler*Comments to Author , Randall Nelson*, Tara McCarthy*†, Theodore Andreadis‡, Mary Jane Lis§, Richard French¶, William Beckwith*, Donald Mayo*, Gary Archambault*, and Matthew Cartter*
Author affiliations: *Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, Connecticut, USA; †Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; ‡Connecticut Agricultural Experiment Station, New Haven, Connecticut, USA; §Connecticut Department of Agriculture, Hartford, Connecticut, USA; ¶University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA

Main Article

Figure 3

Percentage of dead crows testing positive for West Nile virus, by county and 2-week intervals, June 25-October 28, 2000, Connecticut.

Figure 3. . Percentage of dead crows testing positive for West Nile virus, by county and 2-week intervals, June 25-October 28, 2000, Connecticut.

Main Article

Page created: April 27, 2012
Page updated: April 27, 2012
Page reviewed: April 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external