Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 7, Number 4—August 2001
THEME ISSUE
West Nile Virus
West Nile Virus

The Relationships between West Nile and Kunjin Viruses

Jacqueline H. Scherret*, Michael Poidinger†, John S. Mackenzie*, Annette K. Broom‡, Vincent Deubel§, W. Ian Lipkin¶, Thomas Briese¶, Ernest A. Gould#, and Roy A. Hall*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; †Bioinformatics Inc., Eveleigh, New South Wales, Australia; ‡University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; §Institut Pasteur, Paris, France; ¶University of California, Irvine, California, USA; #Institute of Virology and Environmental Microbiology, Oxford, England

Main Article

Table 3

Range of percentage divergence between the Malaysian and Koutango isolates with lineage I and lineage II viruses

E gene
NS5/3'UTR
Lineage I Lineage II Lineage I Lineage II
MP502-66 20% - 30% 20% - 30% 21% - 35% 21% - 25%
KOU 25% - 30% 29% - 32% 26% - 39% 22% - 25%

UTR = untranslated region.

Main Article

Page created: April 27, 2012
Page updated: April 27, 2012
Page reviewed: April 27, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external