Skip directly to search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to page options Skip directly to site content

Volume 9, Number 7—July 2003

Research

Amoeba-Resisting Bacteria and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Bernard La Scola*, Ioanna Boyadjiev*†, Gilbert Greub*, Atieh Khamis*, Claude Martin†, and Didier Raoult*†Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Unité des Rickettsies, Marseille, France; †Hôpital Nord, Marseille, France

Suggested citation for this article

Abstract

To evaluate the role of amoeba-associated bacteria as agents of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), we tested the water from an intensive care unit (ICU) every week for 6 months for such bacteria isolates; serum samples and bronchoalveolar lavage samples (BAL) were also obtained from 30 ICU patients. BAL samples were examined for amoeba-associated bacteria DNA by suicide-polymerase chain reaction, and serum samples were tested against ICU amoeba-associated bacteria. A total of 310 amoeba-associated bacteria from10 species were isolated. Twelve of 30 serum samples seroconverted to one amoeba-associated bacterium isolated in the ICU, mainly Legionella anisa and Bosea massiliensis, the most common isolates from water (p=0.021). Amoeba-associated bacteria DNA was detected in BAL samples from two patients whose samples later seroconverted. Seroconversion was significantly associated with VAP and systemic inflammatory response syndrome, especially in patients for whom no etiologic agent was found by usual microbiologic investigations. Amoeba-associated bacteria might be a cause of VAP in ICUs, especially when microbiologic investigations are negative.

Hospital-acquired pneumonia occurs in 0.5% to 1% of admitted patients admitted, representing 10% to 15% of all nosocomial infections; pneumonia is the most common cause of nosocomial infection in intensive-care units (ICUs) (1). This pneumonia is associated with high death rates. As the etiologic agent of pneumonia remains unknown in 20% to 50% of cases (2), identifying new lung pathogens is a major public health goal. Aquatic bacteria such as Legionella spp., Pseudomonas spp., Stenotrophomonas spp., Burkholderia spp., or Acinetobacter spp. may colonize in hospital water supplies and have previously been shown to be causally associated with cases of nosocomial infections (3). Free-living amoebae have been shown to be a reservoir of pathogens such as Legionella sp., Burkholderia picketti, and Cryptococcus neoformans (47). The most studied amoebae-associated bacterium is Legionella pneumophila, the agent of Legionnaires’ disease (8), which frequently results from exposure to contaminated aerosols. Additional amoeba-associated bacteria might be implicated in community-acquired pneumonia, including Legionella-like amoebal pathogens (9) and members of the genus Parachlamydia (10). As part of research into the diversity of bacterial agents associated with amoebae in hospital water supplies, we have identified a new α-Proteobacteria belonging to the Bradyrhizobiaceae family (1113). We demonstrated that patients with nosocomial pneumonia hospitalized in the vicinity of the contaminated water in a public hospital of our city have elevated antibody titers to these bacteria (14). In this study, we performed the same kind of analysis but focused our work on a single ICU during a 6-month period. Amoeba-associated bacteria were periodically evaluated in all ICU water taps. To evaluate contact of patients hospitalized in this ICU and amoeba-associated bacteria in the water, serum and bronchoalveolar lavages (BAL) samples were periodically sampled. Serum samples were tested in an immunofluorescence assay against the isolated bacteria to detect seroconversions, and DNA of these bacteria were detected in BAL samples by suicide-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (15,16), a PCR technique without positive controls that incorporates “disposable” primers to avoid false-positive results. The second part of this work was to evaluate if exposure to the amoeba-associated bacteria in the ICU could be associated with disease. Thus, we specifically studied some clinical markers of infection, including fever, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and pneumonia for patients admitted to the ICU. As a definition of pneumonia based only on clinical and roentgenographic criteria has been criticized for low specificity (1719), we used strict criteria in the definition. These criteria were applied to cases in which bacterial documentation was negative to determine if disease observed in patients hospitalized in an ICU may be attributed to amoeba-associated bacteria.

Materials and Methods

All patients admitted to the ICU during a 26-week period who needed intubation and mechanical ventilation were included. Patients were evaluated at admission by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (20). At admission and every week thereafter, temperature, leukocytes and platelet counts, hepatic enzymes, and presence of SIRS and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) were recorded. Serum samples were obtained from patients at admission, every 7 days afterwards, and at discharge. BAL was obtained at admission immediately after intubation by using protected mini-bronchoalveolar lavage (Combicath, Plastimed, Le-Plessy-Bouchard, France), then performed when a lung infiltrate suggestive of pneumonia appeared, and repeated every week until pneumonia resolved. BALs are part of the routine diagnosis and follow-up of pneumonia in the ICU and were not performed specifically for the study. Informed consent was obtained from the patient’s family, according to French legislation. Data about bacteria isolated from blood cultures, lung secretions, and urine by conventional procedures were recorded. When isolated from urine and lung secretions, bacteria were only considered as pathogenic when concentration in the specimen was >105 and >106 CFU/mL, respectively (21).

Definitions of VAP and SIRS were based on previously published criteria (2225), but to increase specificity, we limited our study to severe cases of VAP by adding strict criteria (Table 1). Taps and ice machine water were sampled every other week, as previously reported (11). The procedure for isolating bacteria from water and lung secretions by using cocultivation with Acanthamoeba polyphagia followed by subculture onto BCYE agar plates has been detailed elsewhere (11,26). Bacteria were identified by using 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons as previously described (27). Legionella species were identified by using mip gene amplification and sequencing (28).

Twenty bacterial antigens were tested by microimmunofluorescence as previously reported (14,29). Bacterial species isolated from the ICU water during the studied period and 10 other species previously isolated in the same conditions from other sites (Bosea eneae, B. vestrisii, B. thiooxydans, Mesorhizobium amorphae, Azorhizobium caulinodans, Afipia felis, A. felis genospecies A, A. clevelandensis, A. birgiae, and A. massiliae [11–14]) were tested. The serologic tests were performed on the first serum samples from all patients admitted to the ICU; these patients were available for a second sample (30 patients). The control group comprised 10 patients in the same ICU. These patients had shorter stays and had samples taken at admission but was not available (100 patients) and 114 patients with other diseases, including Q fever (10 samples), trench fever (5 samples), tularemia (8 samples), Mediterranean spotted fever (10 samples), epidemic typhus (5 samples), syphilis (10 samples), cat scratch disease (5 samples), pneumonia caused by Chlamydia pneumoniae (5 samples), C. psittaci (5 samples), Mycoplasma pneumoniae (10 samples), L. pneumophila (10 samples), hepatitis C virus (5 samples), infections caused by cytomegalovirus (5 samples), Epstein Barr virus (11 samples), and HIV (10 samples). Serum samples were diluted at 1:25, 1:50, and 1:100 for immunoglobulin (Ig) G and IgM determination. The cutoff titer for a positive detection was determined as the lowest titer for which all first serum samples and control serum samples were negative. Then, all patients’ serum samples were tested and serial twofold dilutions from 1:50 to 1:1600 were made on these samples with titers at least equal to the cutoff titer. Tests by Western blot were performed as previously described (29) for any patient with a seroconversion.

DNA was extracted from BAL samples by using QIAMP Tissue kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. PCR detection was attempted on all BAL samples for bacteria against which at least one seroconversion was generated. DNA extraction from serum samples was performed in a laboratory other than the one in which the isolates were identified to avoid vertical contamination from previous amplifications, and no positive control was used to avoid horizontal contamination from the same experiment (16). We used a nested PCR that incorporated two primer pairs used only once (Table 2) followed by sequencing and comparison to the targeted sequence, as previously described for suicide-PCR (15,16). All samples were tested the same day in the same assay. Sample testing was blinded, and positive amplicons were sequenced. Negative controls consisted of BAL samples from 10 patients of the same ICU obtained at admission, BAL samples from 200 patients with nosocomial pneumonia hospitalized in other medical centers of the city, water samples, and a suspension of A. polyphagia. At least one negative control was used for every two serum samples.

Comparisons of demographic, clinical, and laboratory data between patients with evidence of amoeba-associated bacteria contact (seroconversion or positive detection in BAL samples) were performed by using chi square and Mann-Whitney tests, respectively. The tested variables were age; sex; an underlying disease; severity score; intubation duration; hospitalization duration; SIRS; death; increase of hepatic enzymes, platelet count, and leukocytes; VAP; and fever. We also compared demographic, clinical, and laboratory data between patients with and without unexplained VAP, fever, and SIRS. Multivariate analysis adjusted for age, sex, prolonged intubation, and an underlying disease was performed to confirm observed associations. STATA software (v. 7.0, Stata Corporation, College Station, TX) was used for analysis.

Results

Ten species (310 isolates) were identified from 864 water samples (Table 3). B. massiliensis and L. anisa were the two most commonly isolated species (62.3% of the 310 isolates). In the ICU admission rooms , isolation of L. anisa ranged from 75% to 100% of the tested taps during the first 20 weeks; whereas all were negative during the last 6 weeks, after taps were changed. No amoeba-associated bacteria were isolated from BAL.

Figure

Thumbnail of Western blot showing seroconversions in immunoglobulin (Ig) G (Lanes 1, 3, 5, 7) and IgM (Lanes 2, 4, 6, 8) of patient 2 against Bosea massiliensis (Lanes 1 to 4) and patient 9 against Legionella anisa (Lanes 5 to 8). Lanes 1, 2, 5, 6: acute-phase sera; Lanes 3, 4, 7, 8: convalescent-phase sera.

Figure. Western blot showing seroconversions in immunoglobulin (Ig) G (Lanes 1, 3, 5, 7) and IgM (Lanes 2, 4, 6, 8) of patient 2 against Bosea massiliensis (Lanes 1 to 4) and...

Ninety serum samples from the 30 patients and the 214 control serum samples were tested by an immunofluorescence assay for IgG and IgM on the 20 amoeba-associated bacteria antigens (12,160 tests). The 30 first serum samples and the samples from blood donors did not have an IgG titer of >1:50 or IgM titer >1:25. Cutoff titers for positive serologic tests with 100% specificity are shown in Table 4. Twelve (40%) patients seroconverted from 10 to 35 days after admission to at least one antigen; 10 showed IgM antibodies (Table 5). Five patients seroconverted to L. anisa, six to B. massiliensis, including one to both, one to L. quinlivanii, and one to A. broomeae. Western blots confirmed the seroconversions, with the appearance of several reacting bands on convalescent-phase serum samples (Figure). Patients also seroconverted to amoeba-associated bacteria not detected in the water in this study: two to A. clevelandensis (patient 2, IgG=1:100 and IgM=1:100; patient 8, IgG=1:50 and IgM=1:200;) and two to A. felis (patient 2, IgG=1:100 and IgM=1:100; patient 9, IgG=1:1600 and IgM=1:25). Seroconversions were significantly more frequent against amoeba-associated bacteria obtained in this ICU than against amoeba-associated bacteria isolated in previous studies: 13 of 300 tests versus 4 of 300 tests and 12 of 30 patients versus 4 of 30 patients (p=0.046 and p=0.039, respectively). Patients also seroconverted more frequently to the most commonly isolated bacteria, L. anisa and B. massiliensis (>50 isolates, p=0.021).

Table 6 shows the clinical characteristics of patients with serologic evidence of exposure to amoeba-associated bacteria isolated in the ICU. Analysis for risk and potential confounding factors did not indicate differences between patients with or without seroconversion. However, seroconversion was statistically associated with VAP (p=0.026), unexplained VAP (p=0.034), SIRS (p=0.024), and unexplained SIRS (p=0.045). Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that seroconversion was independently associated with VAP even after we adjusted for intubation duration, hospitalization duration, number of serum samples, and underlying disease (p=0.014 to 0.030).

The DNA of L. anisa and B. massiliensis were each detected once in the 66 BAL samples from 30 patients. For two samples, seroconversion to the identified bacteria, L. anisa and B. massiliensis, respectively, was observed 4 and 2 weeks after the PCR was positive in BAL. None of the 210 control patients was positive for these bacteria in BAL samples compared to 2 of 30 patients in the ICU (p<0.01).

The death rate was 33.3%; disease was mainly associated with fever (96.6%), VAP (56.6%), and SIRS (76.6%). No microbial etiologic agent was found in 18 (62%) of 29 patients with fever, 10 (43%) of 23 patients with SIRS, and in 8 (47%) of 17 patients with VAP. VAP was significantly associated with duration of hospitalization (median hospitalization days/interquartile range of 23/18–41 with VAP versus 14/10–21 without VAP, p=0.04), SIRS (16/17 with VAP versus 7/13 without VAP, p=0.025) and seroconversion to amoeba-associated bacteria (10/17 with VAP versus 2/13 without VAP, p=0.026). No other statistical difference was observed between patients with VAP and without VAP in terms of demographic, clinical, and paraclinical data, risks, and potential confounding factors. Most patients received cephalothin for the first 3 days of hospitalization as an antibiotic prophylaxis. The most commonly used antibiotics in patients with VAP were third-generation cephalosporins. Patients with VAP received antibiotics more frequently and for more than 1 week (16/17 with VAP versus 7/13 without VAP, p=0.025).

Discussion

We confirmed that several amoeba-associated bacteria are common in the water in ICU; we recovered 310 amoeba-associated bacteria isolates from 10 species from the water of the ICU. As exposure to a microorganism is a prerequisite to infectious disease, we first evaluated contact of patients hospitalized in the ICU with amoeba-associated bacteria in water. We found that 12 (40%) of 30 of patients seroconverted to amoeba-associated bacteria and that these seroconversions were significantly more common against local isolates than to amoeba-associated bacteria from other ICUs. Moreover, antibody response parallels that of water contamination with B. massiliensis and L. anisa, which cause 83% of seroconversions identified in 62% of isolates (p=0.021). The cutoff titers, chosen to have 100% specificity, and the detection of several reactive antigens in the Western blots (Figure) suggest that these seroconversions represent specific serologic reactions. Detection of antibodies reacting to amoeba antigens would also be important because infections could occur through inhalation (perhaps after colonization) of infected amoebae acting as a “Trojan horse” (6). In future studies, isolation of amoebae in the aquatic environment as in the BAL samples of patients will be performed for further use as antigens.

Patient exposure to amoeba-associated bacteria from the ICU was also evident in results of amoeba-associated bacteria DNA detection in BAL samples from 2 of 30 patients as compared with 0 of 210 control patients (p<0.01). Moreover, for these patients, bacterial DNA was detected in the BAL sample before the seroconversion to the same bacteria 2 to 4 weeks after admission. This rate is compatible with an acute infection occurring during hospitalization rather than colonization of the respiratory tracts of patients. Contamination is unlikely when using a suicide-PCR procedure (15,16). Isolation of these agents was probably hampered by the antibiotic prophylaxis instituted at admission in this ICU for trauma patients and likely explains the lack of amoeba-associated bacteria isolation in BAL samples.

Among the 30 patients, VAP occurred frequently (56.6%) and was associated with hospitalization duration, as previously reported (30,31). Of the patients with VAP, 58.8% seroconverted to amoeba-associated bacteria, as compared to 15.4% of the remaining 13 patients (p=0.026). In patients with seroconversion, SIRS was also more prevalent (p=0.024). The percentages of unexplained VAP and unexplained SIRS were four times more common in amoeba-associated bacteria seroconverters than in nonseroconverters and remained statistically significant in spite of the small population studied (Table 6). Thus, amoeba-associated bacteria may be a common cause of unexplained VAP and SIRS.

Finally, we identified a cryptic outbreak in the ICU caused by L. anisa, a pathogen commonly encountered in the environment (32,33), only implicated in a few epidemics of Pontiac fever (34,35) and four cases of legionellosis (26,3638). Five (16.7%) of 30 patients were infected with this bacterium, considered a relatively rare pathogen. Serologic tests are not currently used for L. anisa, and no urinary antigen test is available. Therefore, diagnosis based only on isolation may explain why L. anisa is so rarely reported. However, its absence in the BAL samples from the 200 patients from other ICUs shows that local epidemiology plays a major role. This study confirms that L. anisa is common in the environment (32,33).

Members of the Bosea genus are gram-negative, oxidase-positive, catalase-positive rods belonging to the α-2 subgroup of Proteobacteria. All are motile. They grow well on BCYE agar from 25°C to 37°C but do not grow or grow weakly on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood. Colonies are smooth, mucoid, round, and cream colored and are urease positive and α-hemolytic on Columbia agar with 5% sheep blood and 0.2% yeast extract. B. massilensis are negative in assays for arginine dihydrolase activity, esculin and gelatin hydrolysis, β-galactosidase activity, maltose assimilation, and acid production by fermentation or oxidation of substrates tested in API 50 CH (Biomérieux, Marcy l’étoile, France), especially D-glucose, D-fructose, D-mannose, and sucrose. The species of the Bosea genus have high MICs to penicillin and amoxicillin and low MICs to doxycycline (13). In co-culture with A. polyphagia, B. vestrisii, B. eneae, and B. massiliensis are phagocyted and form progressively large vacuoles that lead to amoebal lysis; however, they have never been reported as pathogenic agents before. As B. massiliensis has not been tentatively isolated elsewhere, whether our findings reflect a local phenomenon or whether the bacterium is widely encountered is not known. We think that our data support the role of B. massiliensis in severe VAP, but confirmation is needed to definitely establish a role.

Our study indicates that most patients with VAP received β-lactam agents, mainly amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and third-generation cephalosporin. These antibiotics may have inhibited bacterial culture, which explains why no amoeba-associated bacteria were isolated from BAL samples. B. massiliensis has low MICs (<0.5 mg/L) to ceftriaxone, doxycycline, rifampin, and erythromycin (13). However, β-lactam agents are also active in vitro on Legionella spp., but animal models and clinical studies have demonstrated their inefficacy in the treatment of Legionellosis (39).

The results of our study confirm that the bacteriologic tests of hospital water supplies is largely ignored. Our work demonstrates that patients are exposed specifically to the most common water amoeba–associated bacteria in their environment, as evidenced by seroconversion against these bacteria and DNA of these bacteria in BAL samples. The route of infection, even if caused by aerosols generated in the ICU, remains unclear. Patients of this ICU sometime receive water through nasogastric tubes but only bottled, sterile water. However, we cannot exclude mistakes caused by not following recommended procedures. Patients for whom exposure to these bacteria is supported by seroconversion or DNA detection in BAL samples have unexplained VAP and SIRS more commonly. We speculate that amoeba-associated bacteria in the environment of intubated patients may concurrently cause unexplained infections and cryptic outbreaks. Research of new etiologic agents of pneumonia in ICUs should be based on environmental study of each ICU since ecologic findings of amoeba-associated bacteria in water points in hospital vary.

Dr. La Scola is associate professor at Marseilles Medicine Faculty. He is a member of the Unité des Rickettsies (CNRS UMR 6020, World Health Organization reference center for rickettsiae and rickettsial diseases). His fields of interest are isolation and description of fastidious bacteria, including Coxiella, Rickettsia, Bartonella, Tropheryma, and amoeba-associated bacteria.

Acknowledgments

The authors are indebted to Lina Barrassi for technical help and Kelly Johnston and John Dumler for reviewing the manuscript.

This work was supported by the Programme Hospitalier de Recherche Clinique.

References

  1. Wenzel RP. Hospital-acquired pneumonia: overview of the current state of the art for prevention and control. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989;8:5660. DOIPubMed
  2. Marrie TJ, Durant H, Yates L. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring hospitalization: 5-year prospective study. Rev Infect Dis. 1989;11:58699.PubMed
  3. Rutala WA, Weber DJ. Water as a reservoir of nosocomial pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1997;18:60916. DOIPubMed
  4. Rowbotham TJ. Preliminary report on the pathogenicity of Legionella pneumophila for freshwater and soil amoebae. J Clin Pathol. 1980;33:117983. DOIPubMed
  5. Michel R, Hauröder B. Isolation of an Acanthamoeba strain with intracellular Burkholderia pickettii infection. Zentralbl Bakteriol. 1997;285:54157.PubMed
  6. Barker J, Brown MRW. Trojan horses of the microbial world: protozoa and the survival of bacterial pathogens in the environment. Microbiology. 1994;140:12539. DOIPubMed
  7. Steenbergen JN, Shuman HA, Casadevall A. Cryptococcus neoformans interactions with amoebae suggest an explanation for its virulence and intracellular pathogenic strategy in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98:1524550. DOIPubMed
  8. Stout JE, Yu VL. Legionellosis. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:6827. DOIPubMed
  9. Marrie TJ, Raoult D, La Scola B, Birtles RJ, de Carolis E. Legionella-like and other amoebal pathogens as agents of community-acquired pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001;7:10269. DOIPubMed
  10. Greub G, Raoult D. Parachlamydiaceae potential emerging pathogens. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:62530.PubMed
  11. La Scola B, Barrassi L, Raoult D. Isolation of new fastidious α Proteobacteria and Afipia felis from hospital water supplies by direct plating and amoebal co-culture procedures. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2000;34:12937. DOIPubMed
  12. La Scola B, Mallet MN, Grimont PAD, Raoult D. Description of Afipia birgiae sp. nov., Afipia massiliae sp. nov. and recognition of Afipia felis genospecies A. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2002;52:177382. DOIPubMed
  13. La Scola B, Mallet MN, Grimont PAD, Raoult D. Bosea eneae sp. nov., Bosea massiliensis sp. nov. and Bosea vestrisii sp. nov., isolated from water supplies, and emendation of the genus Bosea (Das 1996). Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2003. In press. DOIPubMed
  14. La Scola B, Mezi L, Auffray JP, Berland Y, Raoult D. Intensive care unit patients are exposed to amoeba associated pathogens. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2002;23:4625. DOIPubMed
  15. Raoult D, Aboudharam G, Crubezy E, Larrouy G, Ludes B, Drancourt M. Molecular identification by “suicide PCR” of Yersinia pestis as the agent of Medieval Black Death. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:128003. DOIPubMed
  16. Raoult D, Fournier PE, Fenollar F, Jensenius M, Prioe T, de Pina JJ, Rickettsia africae, a tick-borne pathogen in travelers to sub-Saharan Africa. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:150410. DOIPubMed
  17. A’Court CH, Garrard CS, Crook D, Bowler L, Conlon C, Peto T, Microbiologic lung surveillance in mechanically ventilated patients using non-directed bronchial lavage and quantitative culture. Q J Med. 1993;86:63548.PubMed
  18. Kollef MH, Bock KR, Richards RD, Hearns ML. The safety and diagnostic accuracy of minibronchoalveolar lavage in patients with suspected ventilator-associated pneumonia. Ann Intern Med. 1995;122:7438.PubMed
  19. Sanchez-Nieto JM, Torres A, Garcia-Cordoba F, El Ebiary M, Carillo A, Ruiz J, Impact of invasive and non-invasive quantitative culture sampling on outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a pilot study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157:3716.PubMed
  20. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II : a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:81829. DOIPubMed
  21. Reisner BS, Woods GL, Thomson RB Jr, Larone DH, Garcia LS, Shimizu RY. Specimen processing. In: Murray PR, Baron EJ, Pfaller MA, Tenover FC, Yolken RH, editors. Manual of clinical microbiology. 7th ed. Washington: American Society for Microbiology; 1999. p. 64–104.
  22. Kollef MH. Ventilator-associated pneumonia, a multivariate analysis. JAMA. 1993;270:196570. DOIPubMed
  23. Salata RA, Lederman MM, Shlaes DM, Jacobs MR, Eckstein E, Tweardy D, Am Rev Respir Dis. 1987;135:42632.PubMed
  24. American Thoracic Society. Hospital-acquired pneumonia in adults: diagnosis, assessment of severity, initial antimicrobial therapy, and preventive strategies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:171125.PubMed
  25. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, Dellinger RP, Fein AM, Knaus WA, Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest. 1992;101:164455. DOIPubMed
  26. La Scola B, Mezi L, Weiller PJ, Raoult D. Isolation of Legionella anisa using an amoebal coculture procedure. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39:3656. DOIPubMed
  27. Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carlioz A, Martelin R, Gayral JP, Raoult D. 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:362330.PubMed
  28. Ratcliff RM, Lanser JA, Manning PA, Heuzenroeder MW. Sequence-based classification scheme for the genus Legionella targeting the mip gene. J Clin Microbiol. 1998;36:15607.PubMed
  29. La Scola B, Rydkina L, Ndihokubwayo JB, Vene S, Raoult D. Serological differentiation of murine typhus and epidemic typhus using cross-adsorption and Western blotting. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2000;7:6126.PubMed
  30. George DL, Falk PS, Wunderink RG, Leeper KVJ, Meduri GU, Steere EL, Epidemiology of ventilator-acquired pneumonia based on protected bronchosopic sampling. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158:183947.PubMed
  31. Vincent JL, Bihari DJ, Suter PM, Bruining HA, White J, Nicolas-Chanoin MH, The prevalence of nosocomial infection in intensive care units in Europe. JAMA. 1995;274:63944. DOIPubMed
  32. Gorman GW, Feeley JC, Steigerwalt A, Edelstein PH, Moss CW, Brenner DJ. Legionella anisa: a new species of Legionella isolated from potable waters and a cooling tower. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985;49:3059.PubMed
  33. Bornstein N, Vieilly C, Marmet D, Surgot M, Fleurette J. Isolation of Legionella anisa from a hospital hot water system. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1985;4:32730. DOIPubMed
  34. Fenstersheib MD, Miller M, Diggins C, Liska S, Detwiler L, Werner SB, Outbreak of Pontiac fever due to Legionella anisa. Lancet. 1990;336:357. DOIPubMed
  35. Fields BS, Barbaree JM, Sanden GN, Morrill WE. Virulence of Legionella anisa strain associated with Pontiac fever: an evaluation using protozoan, cell culture, and guinea pig models. Infect Immun. 1990;58:313942.PubMed
  36. Bornstein N, Mercatello A, Marmet D, Surgot M, Deveaux Y, Fleurette J. Pleural infection caused by Legionella anisa. J Clin Microbiol. 1989;27:21001.PubMed
  37. Thacker WL, Benson RF, Hawes L, Mayberry WR, Brenner DJ. Characterization of a Legionella anisa strain isolated from a patient with pneumonia. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28:1223.PubMed
  38. Fallon RJ, Stack BH. Legionnaires disease due to Legionella anisa. J Infect. 1990;20:2279. DOIPubMed
  39. Vergis EN, Yu VL. Legionella species. In: Yu VL, Merigan TC Jr, Barriere SL, editors. Antimicrobial therapy and vaccines. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1999. p. 257–72.

Figure

Tables

Suggested citation for this article: La Scola B, Boyadjiev I, Greub G, Khamis A, Martin C, Raoult D. Amoeba-resisting bacteria and ventilator-associated pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis [serial online] 2003 Jul [date cited]. Available from: URL: http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/9/7/03-0065

DOI: 10.3201/eid0907.030065

Table of Contents – Volume 9, Number 7—July 2003

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Didier Raoult, Unité des Rickettsies, CNRS UMR 6020, Faculté de médecine, 27 Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille Cedex 05, France; fax: 33(0)4.91.83.03.90

character(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

TOP