Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 10, Number 4—April 2004
Research

Human Metapneumovirus Infection among Children Hospitalized with Acute Respiratory Illness

James A. Mullins*, Dean D. Erdman*, Geoffrey A. Weinberg†, Kathryn M. Edwards‡, Caroline B. Hall†, Frances J. Walker*, Marika Iwane*, and Larry J. Anderson*Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; †University of Rochester School of Medicine & Dentistry, Rochester, New York, USA; ‡Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA

Main Article

Table 1

Characteristics of HMPV-positive patients, RSV-positive patients, and the rest of the study cohort, New Vaccine Surveillance Network acute respiratory illness study, August 2000–September 2001

Characteristic HMPV-positive, n = 26 (%) RSV-positive, n = 125 (%) Rest of cohort, n = 517 (%)
Median age
11.5 moa,c
3 mo
7 mo
Range
1–43 mo
<1–56 mo
<1–59 mo
Age distribution



<6 mo
5 (19)b,c
73 (58)a,c
244 (47)
6 mo–1 y
8 (31)b,c
26 (21)a,c
80 (15)
1–2 y
11 (42)b,c
19 (15)a,c
82 (16)
>2 y
2 ( 8)b,c
7 ( 6)a,c
111 (22)
Male
18 (69)
72 (58)
295 (57)
Race



   White (non-Hispanic)
17 (65)
75 (60)
256 (50)
   Black (non-Hispanic)
8 (31)
32 (26)
172 (33)
   Hispanic
1 ( 4)
13 (10)
55 (11)
   Other
0 ( 0)
5 ( 4)
26 ( 5)
   Unknown
0 ( 0)
0 ( 0)
8 ( 2)
Underlying medical condition
14 (54)a,d
36 (29)
163 (31)b,d
Born premature
8 (31)
19 (16)
77 (15)
Breastfed
16 (62)
71 (58)
274 (53)
Exposed to household smoker
13 (50)
50 (41)
236 (46)
Attended daycare
8 (31)
31 (25)
167 (32)
Site



   Nashville
9 (35)
59 (47)
282 (55)
   Rochester 17 (65) 66 (53) 235 (45)

aComparison of HMPV-positive to RSV-positive patients. HMPV, human metapneumovirus; RSV, respiratory syncytial virus.
bComparison of HMPV-positive patients to rest of cohort.
cp<0.001.
dp<0.05.

Main Article

Page created: February 09, 2011
Page updated: February 09, 2011
Page reviewed: February 09, 2011
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external