Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 9, Number 6—June 2003
Dispatch

Fluoroquinolone Use and Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea

Margaret E. McCusker*, Anthony D. Harris†, Eli N. Perencevich†, and Mary-Claire Roghmann*†Comments to Author 
Author affiliations: *University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, USA; †Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Main Article

Table 1

Characteristics of CDAD cases and matched controls, Veterans Affairs Maryland Health Care System, January 1, 2001–June 30, 2001

Characteristic Cases (n=30)a Controls (n=60)a p value
Age, median y
72 (66–79)b
67 (56–76)b
0.30
Diagnosis causing admission



Infectious
11 (37)
11 (18)
0.07
Cardiovascular
5 (17)
14 (23)
0.59
Neurologic/psychiatric
3 (10)
15 (25)
0.16
Gastroenterologic
2 (7)
4 (7)
1.00
Respiratory
1 (3)
5 (8)
0.66
Other
8 (27)
11 (18)
0.42
Antibiotics within 6 weeks
30 (100)
38 (63)
<0.01
Cephalosporins
7 (23)
20 (33)
0.30
Clindamycin
9 (30)
7 (12)
0.03
Fluoroquinolones
22 (73)
15 (25)
<0.01
Piperacillin/tazobactam
12 (40)
18 (30)
0.30
All other antibiotics
17 (57)
27 (45)
0.30
Days at risk for CDADc, median 21(10–30)b 13(7–25)a 0.18

aUnless otherwise indicated, values in parentheses show percentages.
bValue in parentheses shows interquartile range.
cCDAD, Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea.

Main Article

Page created: December 21, 2010
Page updated: December 21, 2010
Page reviewed: December 21, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external