Melioidosis in a Resident of Texas with No Recent Travel History, United States

To our knowledge, environmental isolation of Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis, from the continental United States has not been reported. We report a case of melioidosis in a Texas resident. Genomic analysis indicated that the isolate groups with B. pseudomallei isolates from patients in the same region, suggesting possible endemicity to this region.

To our knowledge, environmental isolation of Burkholderia pseudomallei, the causative agent of melioidosis, from the continental United States has not been reported. We report a case of melioidosis in a Texas resident. Genomic analysis indicated that the isolate groups with B. pseudomallei isolates from patients in the same region, suggesting possible endemicity to this region.
Because the isolate had an unremarkable resistance profile and B. pseudomallei was not specifically listed on the Texas Notifiable Conditions List, the automated system at hospital B did not generate an alert indicating it required LRN confirmation, and the isolate was not promptly reported to Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS). On November 27, Houston LRN reported to DSHS Region 8 (San Antonio, TX, USA) confirmation of the isolate from hospital A as B. pseudomallei. The Houston LRN and hospital A destroyed the remaining isolates because of regulations surrounding handling of select agents.
DSHS and CDC collaboratively investigated the source of the patient's exposure to B. pseudomallei and performed risk assessments to identify potential laboratory exposures at both hospitals.
The patient's only reported travel outside Texas was a visit to Monterrey, Mexico, 30 years before illness onset. Before becoming ill, he resided on a small rural ranch without running water from a municipal source or private well. He purchased water for nondrinking use from a local chlorinated municipal water utility. He used a 500-gallon uncovered tank to store the water and then pumped the water into a 1,600-gallon storage tank. He cleaned the tank 1-2 times/month by climbing inside to scrub the walls. The last cleaning was 2 days before illness onset.
During environmental sampling in December 2018, we collected 56 specimens from the patient's home and property. We concentrated large-volume (30-190 L) water samples on site and processed as described (8). We collected soil samples (50 mL) at a depth of 30 cm (9) from 8 sites in moist soil. Other environmental samples included surface swabs (10 × 10 inch) of the inside of both water storage tanks and swabs of indoor and outdoor plumbing fixtures. We processed specimens by using international guidelines (9) and tested for presence of B. pseudomallei by using culture and real-time quantitative PCR (10). All specimens were negative for B. pseudomallei.
We identified 7 laboratory personnel at hospitals A and B who had low-risk exposures to the B. pseudomallei isolates (5). Recommendations included temperature monitoring twice a day for 21 days and collecting serum samples at 1, 2, 4 and 6 weeks postexposure (5). We performed serologic testing by using an indirect hemagglutination assay (11). All samples were negative for B. pseudomallei antibodies (cutoff value 1:40).
Hospital B submitted the patient's blood culture isolate (TX2018b) for whole-genome sequencing (National Center for Biotechnology BioProject no. PRJ-NA545616). Multilocus sequence typing identified the isolate as sequence type 297 (12)    America (1). A higher resolution single-nucleotide polymorphism comparison of the draft genome assembly with other public assemblies containing geographic data also indicated that the isolate is associated with others from North America. TX2018b grouped closest to TX2004 and to a lesser extent to AZ1999 (BioProject no. PRJNA545640) (Figure 2). TX2004 was isolated in 2004 from a patient residing in the same Texas county as our patient (13). It was originally hypothesized that the 2004 patient was infected 62 years before disease onset, while serving during World War II in Southeast Asia (13). However, TX2004 is not related to strains from Southeast Asia but to strains from the Americas (1). Other regional travel by the 2004 patient was not reported. AZ1999 was isolated from a patient treated in 1999 in Arizona who had recently emigrated from El Salvador. Where exposure occurred for that patient is unknown, but that isolate groups closer to TX2004 and TX2018b than to other examples associated with Central America (Figure 2).

Conclusions
The source of this patient's infection remains unknown. However, genomic analysis showed that the patient isolate groups with existing isolates collected from other patients in the southwestern United States. Isolates TX2004 and TX2018b were collected ≈15 years apart from patients living in the same Texas county at time of illness onset and group together, a finding that suggests B. pseudomallei might be present in the environment in this area. Furthermore, these 2 isolates might represent a new clade endemic to the continental United States. Further investigation is warranted because this region is predicted to have suitable habitats for B. pseudomallei (14).
These findings call into question possible reactivation of melioidosis decades after travel to melioidosis-endemic regions. Instead of a 62-year incubation period, the patient infected with TX2004 might have had an unknown local environmental exposure that preceded symptom onset. A 1991 case report of an 18-year latency for a Vietnam War veteran indicated that this patient was also living in the southwestern United States (New Mexico) at time of symptom onset and had not traveled outside the continental United States since 1971 (15). On the other hand, although geographic and genotypic links between the 2 Texas cases suggest a local source, B. pseudomallei exposure for the patient infected with TX2018b could have occurred 30 years earlier, while visiting Mexico, and the patient infected with TX2004 might have had unreported regional travel before illness onset. Only when B. pseudomallei is isolated from the environment can it be definitively stated that B. pseudomallei is endemic to the continental United States.
B. pseudomallei infection should be included in a differential diagnosis for a patient with compatible disease, even without reported travel history. Increased awareness among healthcare workers and diagnostic laboratory personnel for melioidosis as a disease potentially endemic to the southwestern United States is critical to improve case outcomes and prevent laboratory exposures.
In addition, melioidosis is caused by a Tier 1 overlap Select Agent, but reporting of cases to CDC is voluntary (2,7). Making melioidosis nationally notifiable could improve surveillance and recognition and clarify distribution and potential sources of B. pseudomallei infection in the United States.