Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 13, Number 6—June 2007
Perspective

Economic Evaluation and Catheter-related Bloodstream Infections

Kate Halton*†Comments to Author  and Nicholas Graves*†
Author affiliations: *The Centre for Healthcare Related Infection Surveillance and Prevention, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; †Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Main Article

Table 3

Results of economic evaluations of interventions to prevent CR-BSI*

Intervention Estimated absolute incremental benefits
Estimated incremental cost Cost/benefit ratio Sensitivity analysis Ref.
Incidence CR-BSI, % Mortality incidence, %
Baseline: CHG-SSD catheter Variable Not stated Not stated 27
MR catheter† −0.7 0.009 QALYs (–0.009, 0.016) –$83
($109, –$205) Cost saving Robust
Baseline: standard catheter 3.30 $469 29
CHG-SSD catheter −1.94 –$222 Cost saving Robust
MR catheter −2.79 –$314 Cost saving Robust
Baseline: standard catheter 5.20 0.78 $710 30
CHG-SSD catheter −2.20
(−1.2, −3.4) −0.33
(−0.09, −0.78) –$262
(–$91, –$522) Cost saving Robust
Baseline: less stringent asepsis 5.30 0.80 $676 26
Maximal sterile barriers −2.49 −0.38 –$274 Cost saving Robust
Baseline: Povidone-iodine skin preparation 3.1 0.46 $265 23
Chlorhexidine gluconate −1.6
(−0.6, −2.5) −0.23
(−0.07, −0.47) –$134
(–$21, –$286) Cost saving Robust
Baseline: standard dressing 5.00 0.05 $514 24
Chlorhexidine dressing§ −2.63 −0.03 –$259 Cost saving Robust
Baseline: glass TPN bottles 10.0 0.50 Not stated 25
TPN bags¶ −6.67 −0.33 Not stated $28,326/life saved Variable
Baseline: 5 d 0.92 $1,398 Not clear from source what reported cost-effectiveness ratios represented 28
3 d −0.02 $8 Variable
10 d −0.13 $63 Variable

*All estimates have been adjusted to 2005 US dollars. Values in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. CR-BSI, catheter-related bloodstream infections; mortality, CR-BSI attributable mortality; CHG-SSD, chlorhexidine gluconate/silver sulfadiazine; QALYs, quality-adjusted life year; MR, minocycline and rifampicin; TPN, total parenteral nutrition.
†Refers to results for an 8-d duration of catheterization; intervention was cost-saving for durations >8 d and could not be evaluated for <8 d.
‡Cost year for original analysis not stated; therefore, assumed 1 year before publication.
§Refers to results using baseline conservative assumptions of 5% CR-BSI incidence rate, 1% CR-BSI attributable mortality rate, and $8,000 incremental CR-BSI treatment cost.
¶Refers to results using baseline conservative assumptions of 10% CR-BSI incidence rate, 5% CR-BSI attributable mortality rate, and relative reduction in risk for CR-BSI of 0.33.

Main Article

Page created: July 05, 2010
Page updated: July 05, 2010
Page reviewed: July 05, 2010
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external