Skip directly to local search Skip directly to A to Z list Skip directly to navigation Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options
CDC Home

Volume 14, Number 9—September 2008

Letter

Worldwide Prevalence of Head Lice

Suggested citation for this article

To the Editor: Pediculosis capitis has been well-known since antiquity (1). Human infestation can result in psychological frustration for parents and children (2); furthermore, preventive and therapeutic practices, such as head shaving and the “no-nit” policy of excluding infected children from school, can also induce social stress.

We sought to synthesize the available evidence regarding the worldwide prevalence of lice infestation in the 21st century by conducting a literature search of PubMed and Scopus databases in which we searched for the term pediculosis. We also searched Google for the terms head lice/pediculosis capitis and individual country names and evaluated references of the articles and reports retrieved through this search. Eligible studies were archived from January 1, 2000, to January 18, 2008.

We retrieved 55 studies (Technical Appendix [PDF - 50 KB - 8 pages]). Most studies referred to schoolchildren, but some involved refugees, urban slums, child labor, jails, orphanages, and fishing communities.

Most studies had been conducted in Asia; Turkey was overrepresented. Prevalence varied from 0.7% to 59% and was higher in girls and women. Of the 29 studies, 24 involved schoolchildren; the other studies involved refugee children, child laborers, the general population, street children, jail inmates, and children accompanying their mothers in prison.

In Europe, prevalence varied from 0.48% to 22.4%. However, 1 study reported a much higher annual incidence (37.4%) in England (3). A study in the Ukraine showed increasing adult representation in the overall affected population (4). Six studies involved schoolchildren; the remaining studies involved refugees, homeless persons, and the general population.

Data from Africa, with the exception of 1 study in South Africa, were derived from Egypt. Prevalence varied from 0% to 58.9% and was higher in females. The study in South Africa (5) challenges the generally accepted concept that head lice infestation refers to lower socioeconomic status; of 2 schools, 1 in a low socioeconomic status area, populated by black students only, and the other in a high socioeconomic status area, populated by students of various races, head lice infestation was found only in the second school, solely among white pupils. Of 6 studies in Egypt, 4 involved diverse populations: urban poor preschool children, orphanage children, and the general population.

Most studies in the Americas were conducted in Brazil, although we also found data from the United States, Cuba, and Argentina. Prevalence varied from 3.6% to 61.4% and was higher in females. Of 7 studies, 4 involved populations other than schoolchildren to some extent: urban slum residents, fishing community residents, adolescents and adults sampled randomly from the general population, elderly nursing home residents, and persons living with repeatedly infested children. A recent study in Brazil (6) noted that prevalence rates determined by visual inspection are twice that of rates determined by hair analysis.

Only 1 study has been performed in Oceania. This study in Australia reported prevalence of 13% and that girls were more likely to have active infection.

Our review shows that pediculosis capitis is widespread throughout the world and does not discriminate on socioeconomic status grounds. The traditional perception of head lice as a parasitosis exclusively associated with schoolchildren of low socioeconomic status is challenged by some of the reports (Technical Appendix [PDF - 50 KB - 8 pages]).

Most studies underestimate overall prevalence by assessing it in a specific timeframe; to the contrary, head lice infestation is a dynamic process that can spread hypergeometrically in closed environments such as schools and in the community (7). The point-prevalence reported by Heukelbach et al (8) may represent a more accurate indicator.

Although socioeconomic status seems to be an indicator of the magnitude of lice infestation, more specific determinants are the dynamic processes of hygienic status and overcrowding. A recent study in Turkey compared 2 neighboring villages with different socioeconomic status. The only factor that was statistically significantly related to pediculosis capitis was size of the household; >6 inhabitants was associated with increased prevalence (9).

Another parameter that may indirectly influence overall prevalence and account for the leveling of the prevalence gradient between rich and poor is awareness of head lice and preventive and therapeutic practices. A study in Australia showed that although parents prefer to play a major role in prevention and treatment, they may lack insight into recent advances and dilemmas regarding these measures (10).

Variations in reported prevalence were found even in data from the same country. These differences can result from surveys being conducted during different seasons, various examination techniques, reporting of active infestation or presence of nits, and potential introduction of effective pediculicides.

Although head lice account for a substantial number of missed schooldays in children, among others, it is surprising that pediculosis capitis is not monitored and prevalence is not regularly reported. Although we cannot extinguish the parasite, effective monitoring and planning will enable us to limit the prevalence and distribution of this parasitosis.

Matthew E. FalagasComments to Author , Dimitrios K. Matthaiou, Petros I. Rafailidis, George Panos, and Georgios Pappas
Author affiliations: Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Athens, Greece (M.E. Falagas, D.K. Matthaiou, P.I. Rafailidis, G. Panos, G. Pappas); Henry Dunant Hospital, Athens (M.E. Falagas, P.I. Rafailidis); Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA (M.E. Falagas); Institute of Continuing Medical Education of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece (G. Pappas);

References

  1. Fournier PE, Ndihokubwayo JB, Guidran J, Kelly PJ, Raoult D. Human pathogens in body and head lice. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8:15158.PubMed
  2. Mumcuoglu KY, Meinking TA, Burkhart CN, Burkhart CG. Head louse infestations: the “no nit” policy and its consequences. Int J Dermatol. 2006;45:8916. DOIPubMed
  3. Harris J, Crawshaw JG, Millership S. Incidence and prevalence of head lice in a district health authority area. Commun Dis Public Health. 2003;6:2469.PubMed
  4. Kurhanova I. Lice infestation and lice control remedies in the Ukraine. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1078:35760. DOIPubMed
  5. Govere JM, Speare R, Durrheim DN. The prevalence of pediculosis in rural South African schoolchildren. S Afr J Sci. 2003;99:21–3 [cited 2008 Jul 17]. Available from http://www.jcu.edu.au/school/phtm/PHTM/hlice/papers/govere-2003.pdf
  6. Borges R, Silva JJ, Rodrigues RM, Mendes J. Prevalence and monthly distribution of head lice using two diagnostic procedures in several age groups in Uberlandia, State of Minas Gerais, Southeastern Brazil. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2007;40:2479. DOIPubMed
  7. Stone P, Wilkinson-Herbots H, Isham V. A stochastic model for head lice infections. J Math Biol. 2008;56:74363. DOIPubMed
  8. Heukelbach J. van HE, Rump B, Wilcke T, Moura RC, Feldmeier H. Parasitic skin diseases: health care-seeking in a slum in north-east Brazil. Trop Med Int Health. 2003;8:36873. DOIPubMed
  9. Balcioglu IC, Kurt O, Limoncu ME, Dinç G, Gümüş M, Kilimcioglu AA, Rural life, lower socioeconomic status and parasitic infections. Parasitol Int. 2007;56:12933. DOIPubMed
  10. Counahan ML, Andrews RM, Weld H, Helen W, Speare R. What parents in Australia know and do about head lice. Rural Remote Health. 2007;7:687.PubMed

Technical Appendix

Suggested citation for this article: Falagas ME, Matthaiou DK, Rafailidis PI, Panos G, Pappas G. Worldwide prevalence of head lice [letter]. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 2008 Sep [date cited]. Available from http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/14/9/08-0368.htm

DOI: 10.3201/eid1409.080368

Related Links

Top of Page

Table of Contents – Volume 14, Number 9—September 2008

Comments to the Authors

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Matthew E. Falagas, Alfa Institute of Biomedical Sciences, 9 Neapoleos St, 151 23 Marousi, Greece;





characters(s) remaining.

Comment submitted successfully, thank you for your feedback.

Comments to the EID Editors

Please contact the EID Editors via our Contact Form.

 

Past Issues

Select a Past Issue:

Art in Science - Selections from Emerging Infectious Diseases
Now available for order



CDC 24/7 – Saving Lives, Protecting People, Saving Money. Learn More About How CDC Works For You…

USA.gov: The U.S. Government's Official Web PortalDepartment of Health and Human Services
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention   1600 Clifton Rd. Atlanta, GA 30333, USA
800-CDC-INFO (800-232-4636) TTY: (888) 232-6348 - Contact CDC–INFO