Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 18, Number 3—March 2012
Research

A Systematic Approach for Discovering Novel, Clinically Relevant Bacteria

Robert Schlaberg1Comments to Author , Keith E. Simmon1, and Mark A. Fisher
Author affiliations: University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA (R. Schlaberg, M.A. Fisher); ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City (R. Schlaberg, K.E. Simmon, M.A. Fisher)

Main Article

Table A2

Tentative novel species of bacteria represented by multiple isolates (clusters)

Taxon In clusters
Not in clusters
Total
No. (%) isolates Identity, %* No. clusters Size
No. isolates Identity, %* No. isolates Identity, %
Min Max Med
Actinomycetales 176 (60) 98.1 45 2 15 3 118 97.1 294 97.7
Pseudomonadales 30 (54) 97.1 8 2 11 2.5 26 96.8 56 97.0
Lactobacillales 28 (74) 97.9 8 2 5 3.5 10 95.1 38 97.1
Bacillales 27 (44) 96.5 7 2 12 2 34 94.1 61 95.1
Flavobacteriales 20 (49) 92.9 6 2 7 3 21 95.6 41 94.3
Enterobacteriales 19 (58) 98.3 4 2 10 3.5 14 98.0 33 98.2
Burkholderiales 15 (38) 97.3 6 2 4 2 24 97.6 39 97.4
Cardiobacteriales 8 (89) 98.9 1 8 1 97.5 9 98.7
Rhizobiales 6 (43) 93.5 2 2 4 8 97.0 14 95.5
Neisseriales 5 (33) 97.9 2 2 3 10 96.9 15 97.3
Fusobacteriales 3 (50) 98.7 1 3 3 93.5 6 96.1
Rhodospirillales 3 (43) 97.2 1 3 4 96.9 7 97.0
Clostridiales 2 (20) 97.7 1 2 8 94.3 10 95.0
Pasteurellales 2 (14) 98.9 1 2 12 96.2 14 96.6
Sphingomonadales 2 (25) 97.9 1 2 6 97.1 8 97.3
Xanthomonadales 2 (25) 95.5 1 2 5 97.1 7 96.7
Caulobacterales 7 97.6 7 97.6
Bacteroidales 5 92.3 5 92.3
Sphingobacteriales 4 87.0 4 87.0
Rhodocyclales 2 95.5 2 95.5
Desulfovibrionales 1 94.6 1 94.6
Micrococcineae 1 97.4 1 97.4
Rhodobacterales 1 98.4 1 98.4
Total 348 (52) 325 673

*Sequence identity to the closest GenBank match with species designation (match %). Min, minimum; max, maximum; med, median.

Main Article

1These authors contributed equally to this article.

Page created: February 16, 2012
Page updated: February 16, 2012
Page reviewed: February 16, 2012
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external