Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 24, Number 12—December 2018
Historical Review

Emergent Sand Fly–Borne Phleboviruses in the Balkan Region

On This Page
Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Tables
Table
Downloads
Article
Technical Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
9
citations of this article
EID Journal Metrics on Scopus
Author affiliations: Unité des Virus Emergents, Marseille, France (N. Ayhan, R.N. Charrel); University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA (R.N. Charrel)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Sand fly–borne phleboviruses are associated with febrile diseases and nervous system infections in the Mediterranean basin. Sandfly fever was first reported in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 19th century. Since then, accumulating data show that the Balkan Peninsula, as a transboundary region between Asia and Europe, plays a major role in the emergence of vectorborne diseases in Europe. To provide an inclusive approach, we collected published data on phleboviruses in the Balkan countries and used them to evaluate the impact of these pathogens from virologic, epidemiologic, and public health perspectives. Recent findings show a high diversity of phleboviruses belonging to 3 species or serocomplexes circulating heavily in the Balkans. Focusing on undisputable human pathogens, we found direct and indirect laboratory documentation for Toscana virus, Sandfly fever Sicilian virus, and Adria virus. These data demonstrate that the Balkans are a hotspot for phleboviruses transmitted by sand flies.

Phleboviruses (genus Phlebovirus, family Phenuiviridae, order Bunyavirales) are 80–120 nm in length and display helical symmetry. Their genome consists of 3 segmented negative-sense single-stranded RNA: the large segment encodes the viral RNA polymerase (RdRp), the medium segment encodes envelope glycoproteins (Gn and Gc), and the small segment encodes nucleocapsid protein (N) and nonstructural protein (NS) (1,2). The segmented nature of the genome allows recombination and reassortment to occur with the potential to generate new viruses with distinct ancestors (3,4). Segment reassortment in Bunyavirales has been reported with increasing frequency, especially in the genus Orthobunyavirus (5). Specifically, reassortant viruses have been described in both Candiru and Rift Valley fever species (5,6).

Two sand fly–borne phleboviruses in the Old World were historically associated with cases of sandfly fever: Sicilian virus and Naples virus (7). Later, Naples virus was renamed sandfly fever Naples virus (SFNV), which is included in the Sandfly fever Naples virus species. Likewise, Sicilian virus was renamed sandfly fever Sicilian virus (SFSV), which is still a tentative species. SFSV and SFNV are both responsible for sandfly fever, a self-limiting but incapacitating febrile illness. Toscana virus (TOSV), discovered in 1971, was incriminated as causing central and peripheral nervous system infections in 1983 (8,9). TOSV can cause aseptic meningitis and meningoencephalitis (9–12), as well as a number of other manifestations affecting the central and peripheral nervous system. These viruses are transmitted via bites of Phlebotomus spp. sand flies.

Data concerning the geographic distribution of SFSV, SFNV, and TOSV have drastically increased during the past 2 decades, resulting in a more accurate cartography of their presence in the Mediterranean basin, the Middle East, and central Asia (12–16).

The Balkan Peninsula is a principal region for sandfly fever. It is located in southeastern Europe, and consists of Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, the Republic of Macedonia, Albania, Bulgaria, Greece, Montenegro, Romania, Serbia, and Kosovo. The Balkan region is composed of 3 very different natural entities: the Adriatic littoral in the southwest, the Pannonian plain in the northeast, and a broad expanse of mountainous regions in between. The first record of sandfly fever originated in Bosnia-Herzegovina at the end of the 19th century (Technical Appendix Table). During World War I and World War II, sandfly fever affected great numbers of soldiers in the region (17,18) (Technical Appendix Table). In addition to historical data, recent reports show the activity of several novel viruses with severe human infections. We reviewed all the published data for sand fly–borne phleboviruses in the Balkan Peninsula to provide a comprehensive view of the current situation and of the public health effect on humans and vertebrate animals in the region.

Methods

We searched global web-based resources (PubMed [www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed], Google Scholar [https://scholar.google.com/], and Web of Science [https://isiknowledge.com]) to collect all the sand fly–borne phlebovirus data from the Balkan region. In addition, we investigated libraries and other national resources to identify books and conference reports that are not accessible on web-based resources. We used the keywords “sand fly,” “Phlebovirus,” “Bunyaviridae,” “Phenuiviridae,” “sand fly fever,” “pappataci fever,” “three-day fever,” “sandfly fever,” “Toscana virus,” “Sicilian virus,” “Naples virus,” “SFSV,” and “SFNV” matched with “Balkan,” “Balkan Peninsula,” “Yugoslavia,” “Slovenia,” “Croatia,” “Bosnia-Herzegovina,” “Macedonia,” “Republic of Macedonia,” “Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,” “FYROM,” “RoM,” “Albania,” “Bulgaria,” “Greece,” “Montenegro,” “Romania,” “Moldova,” “Serbia,” and “Kosovo” for the research. After gathering all the data, we discarded the irrelevant publications. We put the collected data in order based on country, year, and the phlebovirus species complex.

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Phylogenetic relationships between sand fly–borne phleboviruses in the Old World based on 589 nt partial nucleoprotein sequence. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA software version 6 (http://www.megasoftware.net). Black circles indicate viruses identified in the Balkan region. The blue shaded box includes all viruses belonging to the Sandfly fever Naples virus species. The violet shaded box indicates viruses belonging to the Salehabad phleb

Figure 1. Phylogenetic relationships between sand fly–borne phleboviruses in the Old World based on 589 nt partial nucleoprotein sequence. Phylogenetic tree was constructed using the neighbor-joining method with MEGA software version 6 (<>

We obtained all the accessible virus sequences from Balkan countries from GenBank. We aligned 589 nt partial nucleoprotein sequences and analyzed them with MEGA software version 6 (https://www.megasoftware.net/). We constructed a phylogenetic tree using the neighbor-joining method (Figure 1) and tested the robustness of each node by 1,000 bootstrap replicates.

Results

We collected 51 published articles: 2 articles from Albania, 7 from Bosnia-Herzegovina, 11 from Croatia, 17 from Greece, 5 from Kosovo, 1 from Republic of Macedonia, and 7 from Serbia (Technical Appendix Table). One reference from Bulgaria was not available (Technical Appendix Table). We found no published data from Montenegro and Romania. Most of the references included data concerning seroprevalence studies conducted in humans or animals (Technical Appendix Table). Several articles reported results about either virus characterization or case reports/outbreak investigations (19–25) (Technical Appendix Table).

Historical Data on Phleboviruses in the Balkans

Alois Pick made a clinical description of sandfly fever in Bosnia-Herzegovina military barracks from foreign soldiers at the end of the 19th century (Technical Appendix Table). Pick, an Austro-Hungarian military doctor working in Trebinje (Herzegovina), characterized the syndrome observed in cases of sandfly fever (26). Sandfly fever was observed both in local populations and in visitors, specifically foreign soldiers. In 1904, Taussig noticed the presence of “pappataci” sand flies in army barracks in Herzegovina and conducted a large clinical and epidemiologic study in the region (27). The “endemic disease” emerged only in places where sand flies were present. Subsequently, the causative agent was discovered as a filterable agent (virus) that used pappataci sand flies as a vector (18).

During World War II, sandfly fever affected great numbers of foreign soldiers in all Mediterranean region and Balkan countries during the summer seasons, when sand fly activity peaks (17). The disease was called phlebotomus fever, pappataci fever, or three-day fever. In 1937, a massive outbreak occurred in Athens, Greece (Technical Appendix Table). After World War II, sandfly fever epidemics were recorded in Belgrade, Serbia, affecting thousands of persons and then expanding into other regions of the Balkans (27) (Technical Appendix Table). Although these articles could be the first record of sandfly fever based on clinical and epidemiologic grounds, there is no scientific evidence to demonstrate whether the disease described in the articles was sandfly fever caused by phlebovirus.

The seminal seroprevalence study using a neutralization assay, by Tesh et al. in 1976, showed that SFNV and SFSV had circulated and were likely to continue to infect human populations in the tested regions (Technical Appendix Table). Also in 1976, Gligić et al. isolated a strain of SFNV (Yug Bogdanovac virus strain Yu 8/76) from P. perfiliewi sand flies in the Dobrič region of Serbia. Other strains of SFNV and SFSV were also isolated in Serbia from P. pappatasi sand flies, but no accessible sequence data are available (24). At the time of isolation, SFNV and SFSV identification was done using mouse hyperimmune ascitis fluid for neutralization assays and acetone sucrose antigens for complement fixation tests. SFNV strain YU-8-76 is available in the Yale University catalog, now stored at the University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston. Partial sequence of this strain has been determined and confirmed the strain as belonging to the Sandfly fever Naples virus species (28,29).

In 1985, Corfou virus, closely related to but distinct from SFSV, was isolated from P. neglectus sand flies collected in the island of Corfou, Greece (Technical Appendix Table). Corfou and SFSV can be distinguished only by neutralization assays, unlike other serologic assays (ELISA, hemagglutination inhibition [HI], indirect immunofluorescence [IIF], complement fixation [CF]). Several studies have confirmed the presence of antibodies against both SFNV and SFSV in several areas of the Balkans (20) (Technical Appendix Table).

Toscana Virus in the Balkan Region

In 1993, a German traveler was infected with TOSV after visiting Athens; diagnosis was established from immunofluorescence serology results, and it is therefore classified as a probable case rather than a laboratory-confirmed case (Technical Appendix Table). Recent serologic studies have provided evidence of TOSV presence in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Croatia, and Greece (Technical Appendix Table). Several human cases documented serologically as TOSV infections have been reported in Greece (23) (Technical Appendix Table).

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Current distribution of sand fly–borne phleboviruses in the Balkan region. A) Toscana virus, B) sandfly fever Naples virus, C) sandfly fever Sicilian virus, and D) Salehabad virus. Pictograms refer to virus isolation or sequence data demonstrating the presence of the virus in that area. Human/animal seroprevalence refers to studies reporting the presence of specific antibodies against the virus mentioned in the panel.

Figure 2. Current distribution of sand fly–borne phleboviruses in the Balkan region. A) Toscana virus, B) sandfly fever Naples virus, C) sandfly fever Sicilian virus, and D) Salehabad virus. Pictograms refer to virus...

In Croatia, TOSV RNA was detected in the cerebrospinal fluid of a patient infected with meningitis; sequence analysis showed that he was infected with a strain belonging to a genetic lineage that had not been previously recognized (subsequently named lineage C), which was clearly distinct from lineages A and B (Technical Appendix Table). Subsequently, TOSV lineage C was detected from a patient in Greece (Technical Appendix Table); unfortunately, the virus was not isolated in both cases and therefore only partial sequence data are available. Later, sequences obtained from P. neglectus sand flies confirmed the presence of lineage C TOSV but also showed that lineage B TOSV was present and that both genetic types were sympatric in Croatia (Figure 2; Technical Appendix Table).

New Phleboviruses Identified from Partial Genomic Sequences

A novel phlebovirus, Adria virus, was detected in 2 pools of sand flies collected in Albania in 2005 (Technical Appendix Table). Adria virus is most closely related to Arbia virus, which was isolated in Italy (8); both belong to the Salehabad phlebovirus species. Adria virus RNA was detected in the blood of a 2.5-year-old patient with febrile seizures in Greece (Technical Appendix Table). This evidence showed that a virus within the Salehabad phlebovirus species could be associated with human disease (Figure 2).

Balkan virus (BALKV) was detected from 2 pools of P. neglectus sand flies in Albania in 2014, 1 pool from Bosnia-Herzegovina in 2014–15, and 4 pools from Croatia in 2015 (Technical Appendix Table). Sequence data analysis showed that BALKV belongs to the Sandfly fever Naples virus species, where it clusters with subgroup I together with Tehran, Zerdali, Fermo, and SFNV YU 8–76 viruses respectively discovered in Iran, Turkey, Italy, and Serbia (30–32) (Figure 2; Technical Appendix Table).

New Phleboviruses Identified from Complete Genomic Sequences

Bregalaka virus (BREV) was isolated in P. perfiliewi sand flies from the Republic of Macedonia in 2015. Sequence analysis demonstrated that BREV is most closely related to Adana virus, which was isolated in Turkey from field-collected sand flies in 2012. In Croatia, Zaba virus (ZABAV) was isolated from P. neglectus sand flies. ZABAV is most closely related to Adria virus and Salehabad virus. Both BREV and ZABAV belong to the Salehabad phlebovirus species (Technical Appendix Table).

Human and Animal Exposure to Phleboviruses

SFSV and SFNV are both responsible for a febrile illness that is self-limited but incapacitating, with signs that are commonly observed in arboviral diseases, such as fever, headache, malaise, photophobia, myalgia, and retroorbital pain. From a clinical perspective, it is impossible to distinguish SFNV from SFSV infections, and also to discriminate between SFNV/SFSV and other arboviral infections. As mentioned previously, historic records were based on clinical and epidemiologic evidence, but virological documentation was lacking for studies before the 1950s (Figure 2; Technical Appendix Table).

Although SFSV and SFNV infections are clinically indistinguishable from each other, they are caused by genetically and antigenically different viruses. Infection with SFNV does not induce cross-protection against SFSV and vice versa (33). As mentioned previously, neutralization test is the only technique that permits undisputable identification at the specific and intraspecific levels. Other techniques, such as ELISA, CF, HI, and IFA, which are prone to cross reactions, cannot achieve unambiguous identification at the intraspecific or at the interspecific level.

Seroprevalence studies conducted in the Balkans from 1976 onward have described antibodies in human populations confirming exposure to several phleboviruses transmitted by sand flies. Complement-fixation tests showed antibodies against SFNV in Bosnia-Herzegovina (Technical Appendix Table), and HI tests showed antibodies against SFNV and SFSV in the islands of Croatia (Table; Technical Appendix Table). In Greece, neutralizing antibodies against SFNV and SFSV were described; 36% of persons >30 of age showed positive results for SFSV, and 13% showed positive results for SFNV. Persons <30 years of age had much lower rates, suggesting that the antimalarial campaign had drastically reduced the sand fly population and therefore the exposure to viruses transmitted by sand flies (Technical Appendix Table). Presence of neutralizing antibodies against SFSV showed wide circulation (71.9%) in mainland and island regions of Greece in dogs used as sentinel animals; in the same study, TOSV and Arbia virus neutralizing antibodies were also found at lower rates: 4.4% for TOSV and 2.6% for Arbia virus (Technical Appendix Table). In Kosovo, 9.6% of the 104 human serum samples tested were positive for neutralizing antibodies against SFSV and 27.9% of the serum samples were positive for neutralizing antibodies against SFNV (Technical Appendix Table). With the same technique, 58.5% of cattle and 22.2% of sheep were positive (Technical Appendix Table). CF antibodies were found for SFNV in 19.4% of human serum samples in Serbia (Technical Appendix Table). TOSV was discovered in 1971, but it was identified as a human pathogen 12 years later, which prevented early inclusion in the seroprevalence studies; thus, almost no data exist for TOSV before the 1990s.

Recent data have confirmed the circulation of TOSV and associated human cases in Kosovo, Greece, and Croatia. In Croatia, 2 risk factors were associated with TOSV positive serology: living on an island and age (Technical Appendix Table). Possible presence of TOSV was assessed in Bosnia-Herzegovina through immune-line assays (Technical Appendix Table). TOSV neutralizing antibodies were detected in cats and dogs in Greece and in cattle and sheep in Kosovo (Figure 2; Technical Appendix Table).

Discussion

Sand fly–borne diseases are widespread in the Balkan region because of the favorable climate and socioeconomic conditions in that area. After the first record of sandfly fever in Bosnia-Herzegovina at the end of the 19th century (Technical Appendix Table), several outbreaks occurred in the whole Balkan region. Epidemics of sandfly fever and leishmaniasis prompted faunistic and ecologic investigations of sand flies from 1947 through the 1970s (33). The number of studies on sand fly fauna has decreased since that time because of the decline in recorded sandfly fever cases. For some Balkan countries, almost nothing is known about sand fly distribution; when data are available, they are too old to reflect the current situation accurately. The collapse of the former Yugoslavia and subsequent armed conflicts have also contributed to the lack of sustained studies on sand fly–borne pathogens in this region. However, recent data show that the Balkan region is still a major hotspot for arboviral diseases.

Most virus studies are based on serosurveillance. The seminal neutralization-based seroprevalence study, performed by Tesh et al. in the 1970s, identified antibodies against SFNV and SFSV in human populations from Croatia, Greece, and Kosovo (Technical Appendix Table). Successive studies confirmed the presence of antibodies against phleboviruses in most parts of the Balkans, and recent serologic studies show the circulation of TOSV in Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, Croatia, and Greece (Technical Appendix Table).

SFNV Yu 8/76 was the first phlebovirus isolated in the Balkans (Technical Appendix Table). It was isolated from P. perfiliewi sand flies; before this finding, other viruses had been isolated from P. papatasi sand flies, which were believed to be the unique vector competent for SFNV and SFSV (17). The recent discovery of BALKV should stimulate studies to address possible human pathogenicity (Technical Appendix Table). Recent evidence for the presence of at least 2 different lineages of TOSV calls for studies to measure its involvement in summer meningitis and other neurologic infections, as were performed in Italy after the discovery of TOSV neurotropism.

Corfou virus was isolated from P. major sand flies in the eponymous Greek island (Technical Appendix Table). Although Corfou/SFSV circulation was assessed by seroprevalence studies, Corfou virus remains the only SFSV-like virus isolated in the Balkans.

Adria virus was the first member of the Salehabad virus complex to be associated with human disease. Because of this finding, and in light of the newly discovered viruses within this species (BREV and ZABAV), future actions should be directed at implementing direct and indirect diagnosis of Salehabad phlebovirus species in clinical microbiology laboratories to better understand their potential public health impact.

The fall of communism, the breakup of the former Yugoslavia, and the following civil war and other climatic and environmental changes resulted in an increase of zoonotic infections that emerged or reemerged in the Balkans (28). As previously suggested for North Africa and in Turkey, it is time to organize systematic testing of patients with CNS infections or unexplained febrile illness for such viruses in clinical microbiology laboratories in hospitals (35–37).

In summary, when historical and recent data are compiled, it appears that the Balkan region is a hotspot for viruses transmitted by sand flies, including those that cause diseases in humans. The variety of different viruses is higher than in other regions that were investigated, and certain areas display sympatric circulation of several viruses. Circulation of these viruses must be assessed by studies conducted in human populations and vertebrates, and diagnosis of human infections caused by sand fly–borne viruses must now be implemented using molecular and serologic tools in clinical microbiology laboratories.

Dr. Ayhan is a postdoctoral fellow at the Institute of Research for Development in Marseille, France. Her primary research interest is the study of phleboviruses transmitted by sand flies in the Old World.

Dr. Charrel is a professor of virology at Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France. His primary research interest is in the field of arboviruses, with specific interest in viruses transmitted by sand flies, and, more generally, study of mechanisms of viral emergence.

Top

Acknowledgment

This work was supported in part by the European Virus Archive Goes Global (EVAg) project, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement no. 653316.

Top

References

  1. Elliott  RM. Molecular biology of the Bunyaviridae. J Gen Virol. 1990;71:501–22. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams  MJ, Lefkowitz  EJ, King  AMQ, Harrach  B, Harrison  RL, Knowles  NJ, et al. Changes to taxonomy and the International Code of Virus Classification and Nomenclature ratified by the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (2017). Arch Virol. 2017;162:2505–38. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Steinhauer  DA, Holland  JJ. Rapid evolution of RNA viruses. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1987;41:409–33. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Briese  T, Calisher  CH, Higgs  S. Viruses of the family Bunyaviridae: are all available isolates reassortants? Virology. 2013;446:207–16. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Palacios  G, Tesh  R, Travassos da Rosa  A, Savji  N, Sze  W, Jain  K, et al. Characterization of the Candiru antigenic complex (Bunyaviridae: Phlebovirus), a highly diverse and reassorting group of viruses affecting humans in tropical America. J Virol. 2011;85:3811–20. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Freire  CC, Iamarino  A, Soumaré  POL, Faye  O, Sall  AA, Zanotto  PM. Reassortment and distinct evolutionary dynamics of Rift Valley Fever virus genomic segments. Sci Rep. 2015;5:11353. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Sabin  AB. Experimental studies on Phlebotomus (pappataci, sandfly) fever during World War II. Arch Gesamte Virusforsch. 1951;4:367–410. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Verani  P, Ciufolini  MG, Caciolli  S, Renzi  A, Nicoletti  L, Sabatinelli  G, et al. Ecology of viruses isolated from sand flies in Italy and characterized of a new Phlebovirus (Arabia virus). Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1988;38:433–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ehrnst  A, Peters  CJ, Niklasson  B, Svedmyr  A, Holmgren  B. Neurovirulent Toscana virus (a sandfly fever virus) in Swedish man after visit to Portugal. Lancet. 1985;1:1212–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Dionisio  D, Esperti  F, Vivarelli  A, Valassina  M. Epidemiological, clinical and laboratory aspects of sandfly fever. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2003;16:383–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Charrel  RN, Gallian  P, Navarro-Mari  JM, Nicoletti  L, Papa  A, Sánchez-Seco  MP, et al. Emergence of Toscana virus in Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2005;11:1657–63. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Depaquit  J, Grandadam  M, Fouque  F, Andry  PE, Peyrefitte  C. Arthropod-borne viruses transmitted by Phlebotomine sandflies in Europe: a review. Euro Surveill. 2010;15:19507.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaidamovich  SY, Khutoretskaya  NV, Asyamov  YV, et al. Sandfly fever in central Asia and Afghanistan. In: Calisher CH, editor. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome, tick- and mosquito-borne viruses. Basel (Switzerland): Springer; 1991. p. 287–93.
  14. Al-Hazmi  M, Ayoola  EA, Abdurahman  M, Banzal  S, Ashraf  J, El-Bushra  A, et al. Epidemic Rift Valley fever in Saudi Arabia: a clinical study of severe illness in humans. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;36:245–52. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Çarhan  A, Uyar  Y, Özkaya  E, Ertek  M, Dobler  G, Dilcher  M, et al. Characterization of a sandfly fever Sicilian virus isolated during a sandfly fever epidemic in Turkey. J Clin Virol. 2010;48:264–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ayhan  N, Baklouti  A, Prudhomme  J, Walder  G, Amaro  F, Alten  B, et al. Practical guidelines for studies on sandfly-borne phleboviruses: part I: important points to consider ante field work. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017;17:73–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Alkan  C, Bichaud  L, de Lamballerie  X, Alten  B, Gould  EA, Charrel  RN. Sandfly-borne phleboviruses of Eurasia and Africa: epidemiology, genetic diversity, geographic range, control measures. Antiviral Res. 2013;100:54–74. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Doerr  R, Franz  K, Taussing  S. Das Papatatsi Fieber. Leipzig-Wien: Franz Deuticke. 1909.
  19. Gligić  A, Mišcević  Z, Tesh  RB, et al. First isolations of Naples sandfly fever virus in Yugoslavia. Acta Biol Jug Mikrobiol. 1982;19:167–75.
  20. Borcić  B, Punda  V. Sandfly fever epidemiology in Croatia. Acta Med Iugosl. 1987;41:89–97.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Hertig  M, Sabin  AB. Sandfly fever. In: Coates JB, editor. Preventive medicine in World War II, vol. VII. Communicable diseases. Washington: US Government Printing Office; 1964. p. 109–74.
  22. Papadopoulos  O. Arbovirus problems in Greece. In: Vesenjak-Hirjan J. editor Arboviruses in the Mediterranean countries. 6th FEMS symposium. Stuttgart: Gustav Fisher Verlag; 1980.
  23. Papa  A, Kontana  A, Tsergouli  K. Phlebovirus infections in Greece. J Med Virol. 2015;87:1072–6. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guelmino  DJ, Jevtic  M. An epidemiological and hematological study of sandfly fever in Serbia. Acta Trop. 1955;12:179–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Drenski  P, Drenski  K. Contribution to the study of genus Phebotomus (Dipt.) and the three-day fever in Bulgaria. Proceed Bulg Entomol Soc. 1928;4:31–56.
  26. Pick  A. On the pathology and therapy of a peculiar endemic 1860 disease form [in German]. Wien Med Wochenschr. 1886;33:1141–5.
  27. Taussig  S. Die Hundskrankheit, endemischer Magenkatarrh in der Herzegowina. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1905;50:164.
  28. Hukić  M, Numanović  F, Sis̆irak  M, Moro  A, Dervović  E, Jakovec  S, et al. Surveillance of wildlife zoonotic diseases in the Balkans region. Med Glas (Zenica). 2010;7:96–105.
  29. Liu  DY, Tesh  RB, Travassos Da Rosa  AP, Peters  CJ, Yang  Z, Guzman  H, et al. Phylogenetic relationships among members of the genus Phlebovirus (Bunyaviridae) based on partial M segment sequence analyses. J Gen Virol. 2003;84:465–73. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Karabatos  N. International catalogue of arboviruses including certain other viruses of vertebrates, third ed. San Antonio (TX): American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene; 1985.
  31. Alkan  C, Erisoz Kasap  O, Alten  B, de Lamballerie  X, Charrel  RN. Sandfly-borne phlebovirus isolations from Turkey: New insight into the sandfly fever Sicilian and sandfly fever Naples species. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004519. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Remoli  ME, Fortuna  C, Marchi  A, Bucci  P, Argentini  C, Bongiorno  G, et al. Viral isolates of a novel putative phlebovirus in the Marche Region of Italy. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;90:760–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Sabin  AB. Recent advances in our knowledge of dengue and sandfly fever. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1955;4:198–207. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Simić  Č, Živković  V. Wildlife sandflies in Yugoslavia. I. The phlebotomids of Macedonia, southern Serbia and the Kosovo and Metohia region [in French]. Glas Srpske akademije nauka CXCIV, Odeljenje medicinskih nauka. 1949;1:151–81.
  35. Alkan  C, Allal-Ikhlef  AB, Alwassouf  S, Baklouti  A, Piorkowski  G, de Lamballerie  X, et al. Virus isolation, genetic characterization and seroprevalence of Toscana virus in Algeria. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:1040.e1–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Charrel  R. The tree that hides the forest: not only West Nile virus, but also Toscana virus and Usutu virus. Vet Ital. 2017;53:367–8.
  37. Ergunay  K, Ayhan  N, Charrel  RN. Novel and emergent sandfly-borne phleboviruses in Asia Minor: a systematic review. Rev Med Virol. 2017;27:e1898. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2412.171626

Original Publication Date: October 29, 2018

Table of Contents – Volume 24, Number 12—December 2018

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Nazli Ayhan, Unite des Virus Emergents, School of Medicine, 27 blvd Jean Moulin, Marseille 13005, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 19, 2018
Page updated: November 19, 2018
Page reviewed: November 19, 2018
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external