Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 12—December 2019
Research

Human Infection with Orf Virus and Description of Its Whole Genome, France, 2017

On This Page
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Tables
Table
Downloads
Article
Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
Author affiliations: Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, Marseille, France (J. Andreani, J.Y. Bou Khalil, S. Mougari, M. Le Bideau, B. La Scola); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Hôpital Nord, Marseille (J. Fongue, L. David, P. Berbis); Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil (J. Abrahão)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Zoonotic transmission of parapoxvirus from animals to humans has been reported; clinical manifestations are skin lesions on the fingers and hands after contact with infected animals. We report a human infection clinically suspected as being ecthyma contagiosum. The patient, a 65-year-old woman, had 3 nodules on her hands. She reported contact with a sheep during the Aïd-el-Fitr festival in France during 2017. We isolated the parapoxvirus orf virus from these nodules by using a nonconventional cell and sequenced the orf genome. We identified a novel orf virus genome and compared it with genomes of other orf viruses. More research is needed on the genus Parapoxvirus to understand worldwide distribution of and infection by orf virus, especially transmission between goats and sheep.

Parapoxvirus is a genus of double-stranded DNA viruses (family Poxviridae) that contains 4 virus species: orf virus, bovine papular stomatitis virus, parapoxvirus of red deer, and pseudocowpoxvirus. Recently, a complete genome from a gray seal infected by a parapoxvirus was reported and constituted a putative novel virus in this genus (1). Zoonotic transmission of parapoxvirus from animals to humans has been reported in the past few decades; the main human clinical manifestations are skin lesions on the fingers and hands after contact with infected animals (2–5).

Most human cases of infection with parapoxvirus reported are caused by orf virus (2,6,7), but some human infections are caused by pseudocowpoxviruses (8,9). Infection of small ruminants with orf virus is frequent and widely distributed worldwide. Orf virus disease is also known as contagious ecthyma, scabby mouth, sore mouth, or infectious pustular dermatitis. Humans can be infected with orf virus by contact with sheep and goats during religious or cultural practices and during slaughter of animals (4,10), and infections appear to be more frequent during the last 3 months of each year (3). Human-to-human infection is extremely rare (11,12). Vaccination against orf virus is available for animals, although it does not confer long-term protective immunity (13). Human infections are relatively frequent when populations are exposed to sheep and goats (occupational disease). However, complete genomes of orf viruses are rarely found in public databases, which results in limited comparative studies in this field.

Diagnosis of human infections with orf virus is usually made by histologic analysis, molecular biology (PCR) studies, or electron microscopy. At least 11 complete orf virus genomes are available, and at least 19 are available for the entire genus Parapoxvirus. Nevertheless, a unique orf virus was sequenced after a human case report (14) (orf virus strain B029). These data are in contrast with those for orthopoxviruses (another Poxviridae genus) in which >300 genomes are available. One of the reasons for limited availability of parapoxvirus genomes is that many of these viruses are not cultivable on most diagnostic laboratories, cell lines (15).

In 2017, we identified a 65-year-old woman in France who had 3 nodules on her hands. She was given a diagnosis of ecthyma contagiosum. Genomic and electron microscopy data confirmed the initial diagnosis as infection with orf virus and identified this virus as the etiologic agent. We also isolated this virus on OA3.Ts cells.

Materials and Methods

Case-Patient

Figure 1

Thumbnail of Nodules on the A) left thumb and B) left little finger of a 65-year-old woman infected with orf virus during Aïd-el-Fitr festival, France, 2017.

Figure 1. Nodules on the A) left thumb and B) left little finger of a 65-year-old woman infected with orf virus during Aïd-el-Fitr festival, France, 2017.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Histopathologic analysis of a skin biopsy specimen from a 65-year-old woman infected with orf virus during Aïd-el-Fitr festival, France, 2017. The specimen shows epidermal hyperplasia with acantolysis and papillomatosis, extensive hyperkeratosis, spongiform degeneration and vacuolated cells, and inflammatory infiltration in the dermis, predominantly by histiocytes and lymphocytes. Hematoxylin and eosin stain, original magnification x100.

Figure 2. Histopathologic analysis of a skin biopsy specimen from a 65-year-old woman infected with orf virus during Aïd-el-Fitr festival, France, 2017. The specimen shows epidermal hyperplasia with acantolysis and papillomatosis, extensive hyperkeratosis,...

A 65-year-old woman came to North Hospital (Marseille, France) because of 3 nodules on her hands. She reported contact 3 weeks earlier with the carcass of a dead sheep during the Aïd-el-Fitr festival (June 25, 2017) in the Bouches-du-Rhones Department in southern France. Clinically, she had 3 painless, well-delimited erythematosus nodules on her fingers with an erythematosus halo (Figure 1). On the basis of clinical suspicion of ecthyma contagiosum, we obtained a cutaneous biopsy specimen for biologic confirmations by PCR and histologic analysis. Histopathologic analysis of the skin biopsy specimen showed a moderate epidermal hyperplasia, spongiform degeneration with vacuolated cells, and inflammatory infiltration into the dermis (Figure 2). The patient was given antiseptic and local antimicrobial drug therapy (2% fusidic acid cream) to prevent bacterial superinfection. All skin lesions healed in 3 weeks.

Virus Detection, Isolation, and Production

We performed a parapoxvirus PCR on the cutaneous biopsy sample by using primers forward 5′-CGGTGCAGCACGAGGTC-3′, reverse 5′- CGGCGTATTCTTCTCGGACT-3′, and 6FAM-5′-GCCTAGGAAGCGCTCCGGCG-3′. These primers are specific for the B2L gene, which encodes the major membrane protein of parapoxvirus.

For virus culture, we crushed a biopsy sample and resuspended it in Hanks’ balanced salt solution (Thermo Fisher Scientific, https://www.thermofisher.com). We then inoculated 400 μL of this sample onto 2 shell vials (200 μL/vial) (7-mL TRAC bottles; Thermo Fisher Scientific) containing 1 mL of OA3.Ts testes cells from Ovis aries sheep (CRL-6546; American Type Culture Collection, https://www.atcc.org) at a concentration of 106 cells/ mL. We incubated 1 vial at 32°C and 1 vial at 37°C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2 and observed daily by inverted microscopy to detect any potential cytopathic effect.

For virus production, we prepared 15 flasks (T75cm2; Corning, https://www.corning.com) containing OA3.Ts cells and Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) plus 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% glutamine. We then incubated the cells, and when they reached a confluence of 80% of confluence, we removed the medium and inoculated the monolayer with 5 mL of virus suspension at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01. We incubated the flasks at 37°C for 1 h to enable adsorption. We then added 20 mL of Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium to the flasks and incubated them for 3 days. On the third day, we discarded the supernatant, washed the cell monolayer 3 times with phosphate-buffered saline, and removed the monolayer by using a scraper. Once all the flasks were scraped and washed twice to collect cells, we transferred all contents to a 50-mL tube and kept the tube on ice.

We then centrifuged the cells at 500 × g for 10 min, removed the supernatant, resuspended the pellet in 10 mL of sterile lysis buffer (1 mmol/L MgCl2, 10 mmol/L Tris, and 10 mmol/L KCl, pH 7.0), and incubated this suspension for 10 min on ice. We performed mechanical lysis by using a sterile douncer device (80 cycles on ice). In parallel, we filtered the entire supernatant by using a 0.45-μm polyvinylidene difluoride membrane (Dutscher, https://www.dutscher.com) and centrifuged the supernatant. Finally, we added 10 mL of 25% sucrose to a plastic centrifugation tube, and slowly transferred the virus mixture from the filtrate to avoid mixing with the sucrose solution (biphasic final solution). We centrifuged the tube at 60,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C, collected the pellet, and stored the pellet at −80°C in small aliquots before genome sequencing.

Sample Embedding and Cell Preparation

We maintained OA3.Ts cells in culture containing minimal essential medium plus 10% fetal bovine serum. We inoculated the cell monolayer with parapoxvirus at a multiplicity of infection of 0.01 and incubated. We then collected the contents after scraping the flask (T-25cm2) at 24 h postinfection.

We used the protocol of cell embedding as described in Bou Khalil et al. (16). We replaced the Epon resin with LR White resin (Agar Scientific, http://www.agarscientific.com). In brief, we fixed cells for 1 h with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in a 0.1 mol/L sodium cacodylate buffer and washed with a mixture of 0.2 mol/L saccharose/0.1 mol/L sodium cacodylate. We then postfixed cells for 1 h with 1% OsO4 diluted in 0.2 mol/L potassium hexacyanoferrate (III)/0.1 mol/L sodium cacodylate solution. After washing the cells with distilled water, we gradually dehydrated them with ethanol, then gradually replaced the ethanol with LR white resin. We performed polymerization for 24 h at 60°C. We obtained ultrathin, 70-nm sections by using a UC7 ultramicrotome (Leica, https://www.leica-microsystems.com) and placed the sections onto HR25 300-mesh copper/rhodium grids (TAAB, https://www.taab.co.uk). We colored the sections with Reynolds solution. We obtained electron micrographs by using a Tecnai G2 transmission electron microscope (FEI, https://www.fei.com) operated at 200 keV and used ImageJ software (https://imagej.nih.gov) to determine particle size.

Genome Sequencing and Assembling

We sequenced genomic DNA of the parapoxvirus by using MiSeq Technology (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com) and the paired-end strategy. We barcoded sequences and compared them with 19 other genomic projects prepared from Nextera XT DNA Sample Prep Kit (Illumina). We quantified genomic DNA by using the Qubit Assay and the High-Sensitivity Kit (Life Technologies, https://www.thermofisher.com) at a concentration of 43 ng/µL. To prepare the paired-end library, we performed a dilution to obtain 1 ng of each genome as input to prepare the paired-end library. The tagmentation step (Illumina) fragmented and tagged the DNA. Limited cycle PCR amplification (12 cycles) completed the tag adapters and introduced dual-index barcodes. After purification by using AMPure XP Beads (Beckman Coulter Inc., https://www.beckmancoulter.com), we normalized the libraries on specific beads according to the Nextera XT protocol (Illumina). We pooled normalized libraries into a single library for sequencing, then loaded the pooled single-strand library onto the reagent cartridge and then onto the instrument along with the flow cell. We performed automated cluster generation and paired-end sequencing with dual index reads in a single 39-h run for 2 × 250 bp.

We obtained total information of 10.2 Gb from 1,140,000 clusters of density/mm2 and established a cluster passing quality control filters at 91.2% (19,783,000 clusters). Within this run, we determined the index representation for the parapoxvirus to be 5.45%. We filtered the 1,078,648 paired-end reads according to the read qualities.

We assembled paired-end reads by using the Hybrid spades program (17) and only paired-end strategy in input. We obtained 1 contig of 132,823 bp with an average coverage of 190 reads/base.

Gene Prediction and Analysis

We used Prodigal software for gene prediction (18). For predicted proteins that had lengths <100 amino acids, we used Phyre 2 software to predict the tridimensional fold (19). For the 130 initial predicted proteins, we deleted 4 predicted proteins with abnormal folds. We performed a blastp analysis (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi?PAGE=Proteins&) of all predicted proteins against the nonredundant database at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) and performed annotation by using delta-blastp results (20) and Interproscan version 69.0 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk). To determine average nucleotide values, we compared close phylogenetic strains by using the OrthoANI algorithm (21); we compared predicted proteins by using the reciprocal best hit and ProteinOrtho software (22) with 80% coverage, 20% identity, and 10−2 as an E value cutoff. The genome is available in the EMBL-EBI database (https://www.ebi.ac.uk, accession no. LR594616).

Phylogenetic Analysis

We performed alignment of 22 complete genomes of parapoxviruses with a closely related squirrel poxvirus, by using molluscum contagiosum virus as an outgroup. We computed alignments by using MAFFT version 7 (23) with fast Fourier transformation, a heuristic progressive method, and manually controlled alignments in MEGA6.0 (https://www.megasoftware.net) to delete inverted repeat regions nonaligned at both ends. We conserved 208,216 positions to build a tree by using the general time-reversible model on the PhyML version 3 program (24) and visualized trees by using the iTol online program (25).

Results

Virus Isolation and Ultrastructure

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Transmission electron microscopy of OAT3.T cells infected with orf virus IHUMI-1 from a 65-year-old woman in France. A) Ultrathin section of an OAT3.Ts cell at 24 h postinfection harboring orf virus strain IHUMI-1 undergoing its replicative cycle where dense inclusion bodies could be clearly seen in the cell cytoplasm. B, C) Higher magnifications of infected cells showing typical enveloped virions. D) Ultrathin sections of an OAT3.Ts cell showing enveloped particles (arrows). Scale

Figure 3. Transmission electron microscopy of OAT3.T cells infected with orf virus IHUMI-1 from a 65-year-old woman in France. A) Ultrathin section of an OAT3.Ts cell at 24 h postinfection harboring orf virus...

The cutaneous biopsy specimen from the patient was found to contain parapoxvirus, which was confirmed by using a quantitative PCR. We inoculated this biopsy specimen onto OA3.Ts cells, and monitored lysis daily by using an inverted microscope. We detected a cytopathic effect at 48 h postinfection. Electron microscopy confirmed the presence of virions in cells at 24 h after reculture and by observations of ultrathin sections (Figure 3).

Characterization of Orf Virus Genome

We obtained a linear complete genome of 132,823 bp with a guanine-cytosine–rich content of ≈64.4%. This genome is the third smallest by length among parapoxviruses, after orf virus strain NP and seal parapoxvirus (Table). We propose to name this orf virus strain IHUMI-1.

Genome organization of orthopoxviruses are known to be conserved and follow the typical structure with inverted terminal repeat variations and a conserved central core genome (33,34). This structure was also suggested for parapoxviruses (35). We investigated synteny by using current complete genome reports. Mauve analysis of 12 complete genomes of orf virus enabled us to observe intraspecies conservation, except at the ends of some genomes (Appendix Figure 1). Moreover, analysis of synteny blocks across parapoxviruses showed the same typical organization (Appendix Figure 2). By using blast and MEGA analysis of the complete genome of orf virus IHUMI-1, we observed matches with all orf virus genomes, a squirrelpox virus genome, and a molluscum contagiosum virus genome (15% coverage and 80% identity). This region between the orf genome and molluscum contagiosum virus genome of ≈3,500 nt (positions on orf virus IHUMI-1 from 97,602 to 101,032) encodes a predicted protein essential for viruses: DNA-directed RNA polymerase subunit RPO132 (Rbp2).

Focusing on the 126 predicted proteins of virus strain IHUMI-1, we observed 124 best hits with different strains of orf virus, 1 hit with a hypothetical protein with Mucor circinelloides (with an E value of 10−3), and 1 hit with Ovis aries sheep, the natural host. The protein showing the best hit with O. aries sheep was annotated as the interleukin-10 precursor. The gene for this protein is found in parapoxvirus and was probably acquired from mammals and known as a potential keystone protein that reduces inflammation during the infectious cycle (36–39). Despite the position of this gene at the left start region of genomes of parapoxviruses, this protein is highly conserved. The interleukin-10 gene of orf virus IHUMI-1 shows 99% nucleotide sequence identity with other orf virus strains and 79% with O. aries sheep and with Capra hircus goats; the gene showed, as reported, numerous synonymous mutations and adaptations by orf virus (39).

Virus Clusters and Distribution

Figure 4

Thumbnail of Maximum-likelihood tree based on complete sequences of orf virus IHUMI-1 from a 65-year-old woman in France (red) and 22 other viruses belonging to the family Poxviridae. Tree was constructed by using a general time-reversible model with 100 bootstrap replicates. All branches with bootstrap values &lt;70 were collapsed. Numbers along branches are bootstrap values. Blue indicates 2 chordopoxviruses that served as outgroups, and green indicates a squirrel poxvirus still unclassified b

Figure 4. Maximum-likelihood tree based on complete sequences of orf virus IHUMI-1 from a 65-year-old woman in France (red) and 22 other viruses belonging to the family Poxviridae. Tree was constructed by using...

Figure 5

Thumbnail of Heatmap representation of strain proximities across complete genomes of orf virus IHUMI-1 from a 65-year-old woman in France (red) and other available orf viruses. Because of the OrthoANI algorithm constraint, we deleted the complete genome orf virus strain GO (GenBank accession no. KP010354.1) that clusters with orf virus strain NP and the complete genome of orf virus strain OV-HN3/12 (that clusters with NA1-11). GenBank accession numbers are provided for reference isolates. Values

Figure 5. Heatmap representation of strain proximities across complete genomes of orf virus IHUMI-1 from a 65-year-old woman in France (red) and other available orf viruses. Because of the OrthoANi algorithm constraint, we...

Orthopoxviruses, such as various strains of cowpox virus, circulate in Europe, and clusters are well identified with clades and subclades (40,41). Concerning parapoxviruses, a previous study of whole genomes of orf viruses showed that clusters exist and depend on whether the host is a goat or a sheep (27). Our phylogenetic analysis performed on whole genomes of parapoxviruses, which used the maximum-likelihood method, identified clusters with 2 different branches of orf viruses that had a common ancestor. This result is similar to that of Chi et al. (27) and showed 2 branches depending on whether the virus host was a goat or a sheep (Figure 4). In contrast, analysis by using the OrthoANi algorithm enabled us to separate orf viruses that originated from sheep and those that originated from goats (Figure 5). The only difference we observed was for orf virus strain D1701, which appeared to be an outgroup strain. Nevertheless, when we used the maximum-likelihood method and the OrthoANi algorithm, we found that orf virus IHUMI-1 clustered with orf virus strain B029. These 2 strains were human isolates obtained after infection from sheep.

Reciprocal best hit analysis enabled us to observe a high degree of conservation across orf virus genomes. A total of 102 proteins composed the core genomes of 12 orf viruses, and we did not detect any differences in core genomes of orf virus clusters. All virus proteins known to be essential (e.g., vascular endothelial growth factor, interleukin-10, and nuclear factor-κB inhibitor protein) (39,42,43) are present in the genome of orf virus strain IHUMI-1.

Protein analysis showed an absence of a predicted homolog open reading frame 119 in orf virus IHUMI-1. For his region, Chi et al. (27) reported numerous deletions and gap sequences (Appendix Figure 3), especially for 3 strains (NP, SJ1, and IHUMI-1). Coverage was <80% in that region for strains SJ1 and IHUMI-1, and the gene was almost completely deleted for strain NP (only 24% coverage) compared with strain OV-SA00. The consequence for orf virus IHUMI-1 is the deletion of the ORF119 gene. This deletion has been implied in cell apoptosis (44,45). Nevertheless, deletion of this gene did not affect the virus cycle and strain virulence (46).

Discussion

We determined the complete genome of orf virus strain IHUMI-1 isolated from a human. This virus is the third smallest (by genome length) in the genus Parapoxvirus. The genome organization of orf virus IHUMI-1 is extremely similar in its synteny with those of other orf viruses that do not have a genetic inversion. Analysis of the predicted protein highlights strong protein conservation, except for the deletion in the ORF119 gene. The mitochondrial protein coded by this gene was recently described as being capable of increasing cell apoptosis (44,45). Despite this finding, our observations and a previous report showed no phenotypic modification in the virus cycle regarding this gene deletion (46).

Conversely, phylogenetic analysis of the entire virus genome showed clustering of orf viruses depending on the host (sheep or goats). This result was similar to those of previous analyses performed on different complete genomes by Chi et al. (27). Some studies did not report similar results; however, the phylogenetic trees in those studies were limited to analysis of a few genes, such as the partial B2L gene (47–49). More complete genomes are needed to confirm this trend and verify there are 2 types of orf virus. In addition, we observed clustering on the whole genome between the IHUMI-1 and B029 strains of orf virus after human infection. Further investigations using more complete genome sequences might be able to confirm if some genetically related strains have the potential capacity to cross species barriers.

Numerous strains of parapoxviruses that infect animals are believed to show variable virulence in humans (e.g., orf strain D1701). However, implication of the host immune system in the severity of orf virus disease and in its evolution have been demonstrated (50).

Our results highlight the necessity of obtaining more complete genomes for parapoxviruses and retracing the route of infection when humans are infected. Further investigations of parapoxviruses should address the difficulties in isolating and cultivating this fastidious virus by using nonconventional cells for diagnostic analysis. However, recent description of a seal parapoxvirus (1) with a high-quality genome sequence obtained directly from a clinical sample could bypass the culture problem. In contrast, isolating the viral particle will always help to improve clinical research and future innovations.

Mr. Andreani is a PharmD-PhD student in the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale program at Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. His research interests include isolation and genomic characterization of large and giant DNA viruses.

Top

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by a grant from the French government under the Investissements d’Avenir Program managed by the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Méditerranée Infection 10-IAHU-03).

Top

References

  1. Günther  T, Haas  L, Alawi  M, Wohlsein  P, Marks  J, Grundhoff  A, et al. Recovery of the first full-length genome sequence of a parapoxvirus directly from a clinical sample. Sci Rep. 2017;7:3734. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Leavell  UW Jr, McNamara  MJ, Muelling  R, Talbert  WM, Rucker  RC, Dalton  AJ. Orf. Report of 19 human cases with clinical and pathological observations. JAMA. 1968;204:657–64. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Johannessen  JV, Krogh  HK, Solberg  I, Dalen  A, van Wijngaarden  H, Johansen  B. Human orf. J Cutan Pathol. 1975;2:265–83. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Nougairede  A, Fossati  C, Salez  N, Cohen-Bacrie  S, Ninove  L, Michel  F, et al. Sheep-to-human transmission of Orf virus during Eid al-Adha religious practices, France. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:102–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Ginzburg  VE, Liauchonak  I. Human orf: Atypical rash in an urban medical practice. Can Fam Physician. 2017;63:769–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Lederman  ER, Green  GM, DeGroot  HE, Dahl  P, Goldman  E, Greer  PW, et al. Progressive ORF virus infection in a patient with lymphoma: successful treatment using imiquimod. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44:e100–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hasheminasab  SS, Mahmoodi  A, Mahmoodi  P, Maghsood  H. Orf virus infection in human ecthyma contagiosum: a report of two cases in the West of Iran. Virusdisease. 2016;27:209–10. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Abrahão  JS, Silva-Fernandes  AT, Assis  FL, Guedes  MI, Drumond  BP, Leite  JA, et al. Human Vaccinia virus and Pseudocowpox virus co-infection: clinical description and phylogenetic characterization. J Clin Virol. 2010;48:69–72. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Oğuzoğlu  TÇ, Koç  BT, Kirdeci  A, Tan  MT. Evidence of zoonotic pseudocowpox virus infection from a cattle in Turkey. Virusdisease. 2014;25:381–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Malik  M, Bharier  M, Tahan  S, Robinson-Bostom  L. Orf acquired during religious observance. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145:606–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Turk  BG, Senturk  B, Dereli  T, Yaman  B. A rare human-to-human transmission of orf. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53:e63–5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Rajkomar  V, Hannah  M, Coulson  IH, Owen  CM. A case of human to human transmission of orf between mother and child. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2016;41:60–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bala  JA, Balakrishnan  KN, Abdullah  AA, Mohamed  R, Haron  AW, Jesse  FFA, et al. The re-emerging of orf virus infection: A call for surveillance, vaccination and effective control measures. Microb Pathog. 2018;120:55–63. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Friederichs  S, Krebs  S, Blum  H, Wolf  E, Lang  H, von Buttlar  H, et al. Comparative and retrospective molecular analysis of Parapoxvirus (PPV) isolates. Virus Res. 2014;181:11–21. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Delhon  G, Tulman  ER, Afonso  CL, Lu  Z, de la Concha-Bermejillo  A, Lehmkuhl  HD, et al. Genomes of the parapoxviruses ORF virus and bovine papular stomatitis virus. J Virol. 2004;78:168–77. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Bou Khalil  JY, Benamar  S, Di Pinto  F, Blanc-Tailleur  C, Raoult  D, La Scola  B. Protochlamydia phocaeensis sp. nov., a new Chlamydiales species with host dependent replication cycle. Microbes Infect. 2017;19:343–50. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Antipov  D, Korobeynikov  A, McLean  JS, Pevzner  PA. hybridSPAdes: an algorithm for hybrid assembly of short and long reads. Bioinformatics. 2016;32:1009–15. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Hyatt  D, Chen  G-L, Locascio  PF, Land  ML, Larimer  FW, Hauser  LJ. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics. 2010;11:119. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kelley  LA, Mezulis  S, Yates  CM, Wass  MN, Sternberg  MJ. The Phyre2 web portal for protein modeling, prediction and analysis. Nat Protoc. 2015;10:845–58. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Boratyn  GM, Schäffer  AA, Agarwala  R, Altschul  SF, Lipman  DJ, Madden  TL. Domain enhanced lookup time accelerated BLAST. Biol Direct. 2012;7:12. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee  I, Ouk Kim  Y, Park  SC, Chun  J. OrthoANI: An improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2016;66:1100–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lechner  M, Findeiss  S, Steiner  L, Marz  M, Stadler  PF, Prohaska  SJ. Proteinortho: detection of (co-)orthologs in large-scale analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:124. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Katoh  K, Misawa  K, Kuma  K, Miyata  T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:3059–66. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Guindon  S, Gascuel  O. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Syst Biol. 2003;52:696–704. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Letunic  I, Bork  P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(W1):W242-5. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Mercer  AA, Ueda  N, Friederichs  S-M, Hofmann  K, Fraser  KM, Bateman  T, et al. Comparative analysis of genome sequences of three isolates of Orf virus reveals unexpected sequence variation. Virus Res. 2006;116:146–58. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Chi  X, Zeng  X, Li  W, Hao  W, Li  M, Huang  X, et al. Genome analysis of orf virus isolates from goats in the Fujian Province of southern China. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1135. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. McGuire  MJ, Johnston  SA, Sykes  KF. Novel immune-modulator identified by a rapid, functional screen of the parapoxvirus ovis (Orf virus) genome. Proteome Sci. 2012;10:4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hautaniemi  M, Ueda  N, Tuimala  J, Mercer  AA, Lahdenperä  J, McInnes  CJ. The genome of pseudocowpoxvirus: comparison of a reindeer isolate and a reference strain. J Gen Virol. 2010;91:1560–76. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang  T, Tulman  ER, Diel  DG, Khatiwada  S, Sims  W, Edwards  JF, et al. Coinfection with multiple strains of bovine papular stomatitis virus. Arch Virol. 2015;160:1527–32. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Friederichs  S, Krebs  S, Blum  H, Lang  H, Büttner  M. Parapoxvirus (PPV) of red deer reveals subclinical infection and confirms a unique species. J Gen Virol. 2015;96:1446–62. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. McInnes  CJ, Wood  AR, Thomas  K, Sainsbury  AW, Gurnell  J, Dein  FJ, et al. Genomic characterization of a novel poxvirus contributing to the decline of the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in the UK. J Gen Virol. 2006;87:2115–25. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mackett  M, Archard  LC. Conservation and variation in Orthopoxvirus genome structure. J Gen Virol. 1979;45:683–701. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Babkin  IV, Babkina  IN. The origin of the variola virus. Viruses. 2015;7:1100–12. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fleming  SB, Blok  J, Fraser  KM, Mercer  AA, Robinson  AJ. Conservation of gene structure and arrangement between vaccinia virus and orf virus. Virology. 1993;195:175–84. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Fleming  SB, Haig  DM, Nettleton  P, Reid  HW, McCaughan  CA, Wise  LM, et al. Sequence and functional analysis of a homolog of interleukin-10 encoded by the parapoxvirus orf virus. Virus Genes. 2000;21:85–95. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fleming  SB, Anderson  IE, Thomson  J, Deane  DL, McInnes  CJ, McCaughan  CA, et al. Infection with recombinant orf viruses demonstrates that the viral interleukin-10 is a virulence factor. J Gen Virol. 2007;88:1922–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Bennett  JR, Lateef  Z, Fleming  SB, Mercer  AA, Wise  LM. Orf virus IL-10 reduces monocyte, dendritic cell and mast cell recruitment to inflamed skin. Virus Res. 2016;213:230–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Fleming  SB, Wise  LM, Mercer  AA. Molecular genetic analysis of orf virus: a poxvirus that has adapted to skin. Viruses. 2015;7:1505–39. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mauldin  MR, Antwerpen  M, Emerson  GL, Li  Y, Zoeller  G, Carroll  DS, et al. Cowpox virus: What’s in a Name? Viruses. 2017;9:E101. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Franke  A, Pfaff  F, Jenckel  M, Hoffmann  B, Höper  D, Antwerpen  M, et al. Classification of cowpox viruses into several distinct clades and identification of a novel lineage. Viruses. 2017;9:142. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Diel  DG, Luo  S, Delhon  G, Peng  Y, Flores  EF, Rock  DL. Orf virus ORFV121 encodes a novel inhibitor of NF-kappaB that contributes to virus virulence. J Virol. 2011;85:2037–49. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Mercer  AA, Wise  LM, Scagliarini  A, McInnes  CJ, Büttner  M, Rziha  HJ, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factors encoded by Orf virus show surprising sequence variation but have a conserved, functionally relevant structure. J Gen Virol. 2002;83:2845–55. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Nagendraprabhu  P, Khatiwada  S, Chaulagain  S, Delhon  G, Rock  DL. A parapoxviral virion protein targets the retinoblastoma protein to inhibit NF-κB signaling. PLoS Pathog. 2017;13:e1006779. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Li  W, Chen  H, Deng  H, Kuang  Z, Long  M, Chen  D, et al. Orf virus encoded protein ORFV119 induces cell apoptosis through the extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1056. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Qiao  J, Yang  HB, Peng  YL, Meng  QL, Chen  C, Ma  Y, et al. Effect of ORF119 gene deletion on the replication and virulence of orf virus. Acta Virol. 2015;59:257–64. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Billinis  C, Mavrogianni  VS, Spyrou  V, Fthenakis  GC. Phylogenetic analysis of strains of Orf virus isolated from two outbreaks of the disease in sheep in Greece. Virol J. 2012;9:24. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Velazquez-Salinas  L, Ramirez-Medina  E, Bracht  AJ, Hole  K, Brito  BP, Gladue  DP, et al. Phylodynamics of parapoxvirus genus in Mexico (2007-2011). Infect Genet Evol. 2018;65:12–4. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Peralta  A, Robles  CA, Micheluod  JF, Rossanigo  CE, Martinez  A, Carosio  A, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of ORF viruses from five contagious ecthyma outbreaks in Argentinian goats. Front Vet Sci. 2018;5:134. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. de Oliveira  CH, Assis  FL, Neto  JD, Oliveira  CM, Lopes  CT, Bomjardim  HA, et al. Multifocal cutaneous ORF virus infection in goats in the Amazon region, Brazil. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2012;12:336–40. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Table

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2512.181513

Original Publication Date: October 28, 2019

Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 12—December 2019

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Bernard La Scola, Aix Marseille Université, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire Méditerranée Infection, 19-21 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 18, 2019
Page updated: November 18, 2019
Page reviewed: November 18, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external