Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 25, Number 12—December 2019
Research

Genomic Analysis of Fluoroquinolone- and Tetracycline-Resistant Campylobacter jejuni Sequence Type 6964 in Humans and Poultry, New Zealand, 2014–2016

On This Page
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusions
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Downloads
Article
Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
Related Articles
Azithromycin Resistance in E. coli and Shigella
Travelers’ Diarrhea Military Travelers, 2018–2023
Redesigning Surveillance through the Global Emerging Infections Surveillance Program
More articles on Antimicrobial Resistance
Author affiliations: Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand (N.P. French, J. Zhang, A.C. Midwinter, P.J. Biggs, L.E. Rogers, D.A. Wilkinson, S.S. Greening, A. Fayaz); New Zealand Food Safety Science and Research Centre, Palmerston North (N.P. French, D.A. Wilkinson); The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia (G.P. Carter, D.J. Ingle, D.A. Williamson); Institute of Environmental Science and Research Limited, Christchurch, New Zealand (K. Dyet, B.J. Gilpin); Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia (D.J. Ingle); Poultry Industry Association of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand (K. Mulqueen); EPI-interactive, Wellington, New Zealand (P. Muellner)

Cite This Article

Abstract

In 2014, antimicrobial drug–resistant Campylobacter jejuni sequence type 6964 emerged contemporaneously in poultry from 3 supply companies in the North Island of New Zealand and as a major cause of campylobacteriosis in humans in New Zealand. This lineage, not previously identified in New Zealand, was resistant to tetracycline and fluoroquinolones. Genomic analysis revealed divergence into 2 major clades; both clades were associated with human infection, 1 with poultry companies A and B and the other with company C. Accessory genome evolution was associated with a plasmid, phage insertions, and natural transformation. We hypothesize that the tetO gene and a phage were inserted into the chromosome after conjugation, leaving a remnant plasmid that was lost from isolates from company C. The emergence and rapid spread of a resistant clone of C. jejuni in New Zealand, coupled with evolutionary change in the accessory genome, demonstrate the need for ongoing Campylobacter surveillance among poultry and humans.

Campylobacteriosis caused by Campylobacter jejuni is one of the most common zoonotic diseases; in many countries, incidence is increasing (1). Typically, human infection with C. jejuni results in an acute, self-limiting gastroenteritis, and treatment is largely supportive. However, antimicrobial drug treatment is indicated for patients who have invasive infection, have severe and persistent gastroenteritis, or are immunocompromised. The mainstays of therapy are macrolides and fluoroquinolones; however, resistance to these drugs, particularly fluoroquinolones, is common in many parts of the world and precludes their clinical usefulness (2).

Among industrialized countries, one of the highest rates of campylobacteriosis is found in New Zealand. In 2017, there were 6,482 notified cases in New Zealand, representing an incidence of ≈150 cases/100,000 population (3). The high proportion of cases in New Zealand is thought to result from ingestion of contaminated food, typically undercooked poultry, which has prompted regulatory and voluntary implementation of control measures along the poultry supply chain (4).

Poultry production in New Zealand is dominated by 3 major supply companies and several smaller companies. No fresh chicken meat is imported into New Zealand (5). Studies in New Zealand have identified dominant multilocus sequence types (STs) of C. jejuni associated with poultry from particular companies; the most prevalent ST associated with human cases during 2005–2008, ST474, was predominant in poultry from 1 company (5–7). The vertically contained nature of the New Zealand poultry supply, which involves minimal transfer of birds between poultry companies, is considered to be a major contributor to the dominance of particular strains at individual companies (5).

In May 2014, a previously unreported C. jejuni clone of ST6964, a member of a poultry-associated clonal complex (CC), CC354 (8), resistant to fluoroquinolones and tetracyclines, was isolated from poultry carcasses at a Campylobacter sentinel surveillance site (9) on the North Island of New Zealand. Concurrently, throughout 2014 and 2015, sporadic and outbreak-associated human cases of campylobacteriosis associated with resistant ST6964 were identified across New Zealand. Subsequent cross-sectional studies of poultry and humans suggested that fluoroquinolone resistance in C. jejuni had increased from <5% to 19% over 1 year (10). The unprecedented rapid emergence and geographic spread of this resistant strain has widespread implications. A marked shift from low to relatively high levels of antimicrobial drug resistance in Campylobacter spp. in New Zealand is a concern for food safety and public health. Furthermore, evidence of very rapid spread across the vertically contained poultry companies requires reevaluation of biosecurity measures in the industry. To determine which factors may have contributed to the dissemination of this clone in New Zealand, we undertook a detailed genomic analysis of ST6964 isolates from humans and poultry collected during 2014–2016.

Methods

Ethics Statement

Approval from the Multi-Region Ethics Committee, New Zealand, is provided for work related to the Campylobacter sentinel surveillance site (application no. MEC/10/16/EXP). Isolates were collected and analyzed through routine public health investigation activities. The 2006 guidelines from the National Ethics Advisory Committee, Ministry of Health, Wellington, New Zealand, state that these activities do not require ethics committee review.

Setting and Sampling Strategies

The 2014 isolation of antimicrobial drug–resistant C. jejuni ST6964 from humans and poultry led to systematic surveys of cases in humans and poultry aimed at determining the extent of spread of this lineage into the food supply and the origin of human cases. During 2014–2016, we collected antimicrobial drug–resistant C. jejuni ST6964 isolates from 4 sources. The first source was whole poultry carcasses and fecal samples from humans with campylobacteriosis at the sentinel site from May 1, 2014, through December 31, 2015 (9). The second source was a cross-sectional survey of human cases conducted from May 1 through October 31, 2015 (10). Five community diagnostic laboratories, covering all major population centers in the North and South Islands, were asked to refer C. jejuni isolates from humans to the Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd (ESR), Wellington, New Zealand, for the survey. The third source was samples submitted directly to ESR from humans with antimicrobial drug–resistant campylobacteriosis. The fourth source was 2 cross-sectional studies of pooled cecal samples from slaughtered poultry from the major companies (Appendix Figure 1). A total of 227 isolates were included in the analysis.

Microbiological Testing

We isolated C. jejuni from whole poultry carcasses and fecal samples from humans at the sentinel site as described previously (11). Isolates from pooled cecal samples came from swab samples taken from the pooled ceca of 5 chickens that were from the same poultry shed and slaughtered in a commercial poultry factory. Swabs in Amies with charcoal transport media (Copan, https://www.copangroup.com) were transported chilled to mEpiLab (Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand) for microaerobic culture at 42°C in a microaerobic incubator (Don Whitley Scientific, https://www.dwscientific.com) on modified charcoal cefoperazone deoxycholate agar (mCCDA; Fort Richard, https://www.fortrichard.com) and mCCDA-cip/tet (LabM Ltd., http://www.labm.com) containing 1 μg/mL ciprofloxacin and 4 μg/mL tetracycline (Sigma-Aldrich, https://www.sigmaaldrich.com). We subcultured colonies that resembled C. jejuni on the mCCDA-cip/tet plates onto Columbia horse blood agar plates (Fort Richard) and incubated them microaerobically at 42°C. All isolates from poultry carcasses and human fecal samples and a subset of those isolated from mCCDA-cip/tet from pooled chicken ceca were speciated by PCR (12). We determined susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline according to Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) methods, by using disk diffusion (13).

For human clinical isolates from the cross-sectional survey and direct submissions to ESR, we determined susceptibility to ciprofloxacin, erythromycin, and tetracycline by using the methods described by the CLSI, with either Etests or disk diffusion (13). Tests were performed on Mueller-Hinton agar with 5% sheep blood and incubated microaerobically at 36°C–37°C for 48 h. We interpreted MICs according to CLSI breakpoints (13) and disk-diffusion results according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing clinical breakpoints (14). We subtyped C. jejuni isolates from humans and fresh chicken carcasses and a subset of those from pooled chicken ceca by multilocus sequence typing (MLST) (15) as described (11).

Whole-Genome Sequencing

For Illumina sequencing, we extracted genomic DNA from bacterial isolates on a JANUS automated workstation (PerkinElmer, https://www.perkinelmer.com) by using Chemagic magnetic bead technology, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. We prepared DNA libraries by using a NexteraXT DNA preparation kit (Illumina, https://www.illumina.com) and performed 2 × 100 bp sequencing on the NextSeq 500 platform (Illumina), as previously described (16). Four representative C. jejuni isolates also underwent whole-genome sequencing on the Pacific Biosciences, Inc., RS II platform (https://www.pacb.com). For this, genomic DNA was extracted from overnight cultures by using the Genelute bacterial genomic DNA kit (Sigma Aldrich). DNA libraries were prepared according to the 20 kb Template Preparation using the BluePippin DNA Size Selection system protocol (Pacific Biosciences, Inc). Sequence data are available from GenBank BioProject ID PRJNA520992 and PubMLST (https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter) nos. 70207–12, 70229, 70230, 70232, 70233, 70252, 70253, and 78631–845.

Genome Assembly

For processing and quality control of the Illumina reads, we used QCtool pipeline (https://github.com/mtruglio/QCtool). To assemble the processed reads, we used the SPAdes genome assembler version 3.12.0 (17).

Whole-Genome MLST Phylogeny

To define whole-genome MLST allelic profiles, we used Fast Genome Profiler (Fast-GeP, https://github.com/jizhang-nz/fast-GeP) (18) and the complete chromosome sequence of isolate 15AR0984 (generated in this study) as a reference. Phylogenetic relationships were displayed as NeighborNets by using SplitsTree 4 (19). The whole-genome polymorphic sites–based phylogeny was inferred from the concatenated sequences of the coding sequences shared by all the whole-genome sequences. We predicted and eliminated all regions with elevated densities of base substitutions and reconstructed the phylogenetic relationship of the remaining recombination-free sequences by using Gubbins version 2.3.4 with the default settings (20). We further examined the relationship by using the 1,343 genes in the C. jejuni core-genome MLST scheme version 1.0 (21) on the Campylobacter PubMLST website (https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter).

Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism Phylogeny

We mapped 227 genomes to complete chromosome reference 15AR0984 (completed with PacBio sequencing, https://www.pacb.com) by using Snippy version 4.3.5 with mincov (the minimum number of reads covering a site to be considered) of 10 and minfrac (the minimum proportion of those reads that must differ from the reference) of 0.9 (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy). We filtered the resulting single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) alignment for recombination by using Gubbins (20), allowing for 50 iterations and specifying the weighted Robinson-Foulds convergence method. We extracted core SNPs by using SNP sites (22), giving a final total of 70 SNPs in the core genome. We then used the filtered alignment as input for IQtree (23,24) along with a general time reversible plus gamma 4 model, constant sites (606841, 268757, 264881, 606654), ultrafast bootstrapping with 1,000 replicates, and the SH-aLRT parameter with 1,000 bootstrap replicates to infer phylogenetic structure. We visualized the phylogeny in R (https://www.r-project.org) by using the package ggtree (25). We investigated pairwise SNP distances by using HarrietR (https://github.com/andersgs/harrietr). We visualized the recombination regions detected in the 227 genomes from Gubbins (20) by using Phandango (26) and annotated the reference chromosome 15AR0984 using Prokka version 1.13 (27).

Comparative Genomics of Mobile Elements

The reference genome 15AR0984 contained a plasmid (15AR0984-m) that was 43,680-bp long. We calculated the likelihood of this plasmid and other chromosomally integrated mobile elements being in each of the 227 genomes by using a method described previously (28). We considered the mobile elements CJIE1, CJIE2, CJIE3, and CJIE4 from the reference genome RM1221 (29) and a variant of CJIE1, named CJIE1v, which was also present in the reference genome 15AR0984. We plotted these data against the inferred phylogenetic tree in R by using ggtree (25). We examined the locations of chromosomally integrated mobile elements in the 4 PacBio complete genomes (15AR0984, 15AR0917, 15AR0919, and 15AR1555) and the reference strain RM1221 by using Mauve (30) and BLAST Ring Image Generator (31).

To find closely related plasmids to 15AR0984-m, we used the complete sequence as a query to BLAST (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) against the GenBank Nucleotide collection (nr/nt) database. We performed phylogenetic analyses of the most similar plasmids (Appendix Table 1) by using the whole-genome MLST method described and using the 15AR0984-m plasmid as the reference and presented as a NeighborNet using SplitsTree (19).

Results

Rapid Emergence of C. jejuni ST-6964 in Humans and Poultry

C. jejuni ST6964 with dual resistance to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline was first identified through sentinel surveillance in May 2014 in 2 retail poultry carcasses sampled in Palmerston North, Manawatu, New Zealand. The only other members of CC354 identified in the country to date are at least 2 locus variants of ST6964, according to the 7-gene MLST scheme, and only 1 other ST-6964 isolate has been reported outside of New Zealand, originating from China (https://pubmlst.org/campylobacter).

By July 2014, C. jejuni ST6964 had been identified in 3 poultry companies, and by August 2014, the first human case was observed at the sentinel site. A total of 3 (1.8%) of 165 human cases at the sentinel site were identified as being caused by ST6964 in 2014 and 4 (3.3%) of 122 human cases in 2015. A total of 10 (13.9%) of 72 retail poultry carcasses at the sentinel site were positive for ST6964 in 2014 and 25 (34.7%) of 72 in 2015. A total of 41 isolates from unique samples (7 human and 34 poultry) from the sentinel site underwent whole-genome sequencing and were included in this study.

In light of findings from the sentinel site, ESR conducted a national survey of antimicrobial-resistant C. jejuni in human patients in New Zealand during May–October 2015 (10). A total of 297 isolates were referred from 5 clinical laboratories: 3 on the North Island and 2 on the South Island. This survey provided 22 of the C. jejuni ST6964 isolates included in this study; 21 were from patients in the North Island and 1 was from a patient in the South Island. In addition to the survey, another 28 isolates from human patients on the North Island were included in this study from samples submitted directly to ESR from diagnostic laboratories.

To assess the extent of spread of C. jejuni ST6964 in poultry, we undertook 2 systematic surveys of poultry carcasses from slaughter plants servicing poultry companies A–D. Only samples from companies A, B, and C, which are based in the North Island, were positive for this ST; these companies accounted for 136 of the isolates included in this study.

All sequenced C. jejuni ST6964 isolates were confirmed as phenotypically resistant to ciprofloxacin and tetracycline. All tetracycline-resistant ST6964 isolates harbored the tetO gene, which was located at a previously described insertion site, between the kdsB and CJE0905 genes (32). The C257T (Thr86Ile) mutation in gyrA, associated with fluoroquinolone resistance (33), was present in all ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates.

Relationship between Core Genomes of C. jejuni ST6964 from Humans and Poultry

Figure 1

Thumbnail of NeighborNet phylogenies generated from the allele profiles identified in the whole-genome multilocus sequence typing analysis of 227 sequence type 6964 Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans and poultry, New Zealand, 2014–2016. The corrected NeighborNet network was generated after eliminating the 87 loci that were identified in predicted recombinant regions (Appendix Table 1). Inset shows the uncorrected NeighborNet network, generated with the original 1,363-loci allele profiles.

Figure 1. NeighborNet phylogenies generated from the allele profiles identified in the whole-genome multilocus sequence typing analysis of 227 sequence type 6964 Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans and poultry, New Zealand, 2014–2016. The...

We used 3 complementary approaches to assess relatedness of human and poultry isolates: whole-genome MLST using Fast-GeP (18), core-genome MLST using the Campylobacter PubMLST scheme (21), and SNP-based phylogeny. Fast-GeP analysis found 1,363 complete coding sequences that were single copy and shared by all 227 isolates. Most of the loci were identical across isolates (n = 1,163 loci), and NeighborNet distances and a NeighborNet network revealed 2 clades, 1 associated with poultry companies A and B and 1 with company C. A similar relationship was evident after removal of hypothetical recombination regions (Figure 1; Appendix Table 2). A similar NeighborNet profile and distribution among poultry companies resulted from the core-genome MLST results (Appendix Figure 2); 954 of the loci were identical and 389 were polymorphic.

Figure 2

Thumbnail of Population structure of 227 sequence type 6964 Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans and poultry, New Zealand, 2014–2016. The tree is the inferred midpoint rooted phylogeny of the isolates, including the reference 15AR0984 genome. The tips are colored by source of the C. jejuni isolate. The heatmap indicates the likelihoods of the presence of mobile elements including CJIE1 variant (cjie1_15AR0984), CJIEs 1–4, and the plasmid 15AR0984-m. Dark shading on the heatmap indicates 100

Figure 2. Population structure of 227 sequence type 6964 Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans and poultry, New Zealand, 2014–2016. The tree is the inferred midpoint rooted phylogeny of the isolates, including the reference...

Figure 3

Thumbnail of Genome structures of the complete Campylobacter jejuni strain 15AR0984 chromosome and plasmid (15AR0984-m) isolated from humans and poultry, New Zealand, 2014–2016, compared with the closest plasmid (pcjDM) sequence found in GenBank. High-scoring segment pairs between the 15AR0984 genome and the plasmid pcjDM ware connected with gray bars to illustrate the similar shared regions except for the backbone regions, which were highly conserved across the pTet-like plasmid genomes.

Figure 3. Genome structures of the complete Campylobacter jejuni strain 15AR0984 chromosome and plasmid (15AR0984-m) isolated from humans and poultry, New Zealand, 2014–2016, compared with the closest plasmid (pcjDM) sequence found in GenBank....

We constructed an SNP-based phylogeny after removal of recombinant regions (Figure 2) and identified recombinant block and associated genes (Appendix Table 1, Figure 3). We found a maximum of 13 SNPs between any single pair of isolates in the 70 shared-SNP loci present in nonrecombinant regions. The lower genetic diversity between isolates in the SNP analysis compared with the allele-based analysis was attributable to the removal of insertion and deletion mutations and loci subject to recombination. In the SNP analysis, isolates were again segregated into distinct clades strongly associated with poultry companies and carriage of mobile elements (Figure 2). Isolates from humans admixed with isolates from poultry in all clades, suggesting that the human infections were linked to poultry from all supply companies.

Plasmid Sequences Associated with Distinct ST6964 Lineages

We identified high mobile element likelihood scores (>90) for plasmid 15AR0984-m in 131 (58%) of the isolates. Plasmid sequences were strongly associated with the core phylogeny and 2 of the 3 poultry companies, A and B (Figure 2). Plasmid 15AR0984-m showed high sequence and structural similarities with other previously described tetO carrying pTet plasmids and shares the same backbone as tetO plasmids pcjDM, S3, and pRM4661 (Figure 3; Appendix Table 1, Figure 4).

The plasmid 15AR0984-m was most closely related to the tetO megaplasmid pcjDM (Appendix Figure 4), which also contains a prophage (34) that shows sequence homology with integrated elements found in multiple ST6964 isolates. These elements are labeled CJIE1 and CJIE1v (a variant of CJIE1), and the latter was most similar to the prophage in plasmid pcjDM. Both prophage integrated elements bear similarities to integrated element CJIE1 identified in C. jejuni isolate RM1221 (29,35). All but 1 isolate (H2239a) contained CJIE1, and all were identified at the same location in the chromosome of the 4 isolates sequenced with PacBio. In contrast, 71% (162/227) of the isolates contained CJIE1v, as did 3 of the 4 complete genomes (15AR0984, 15AR0919, and 15AR1555). Although CJIE1 was located at the same chromosomal position in all 4 complete genomes, CJIE1v was located at a different position in the chromosome of 3 of the 4 that contained this mobile element (Appendix Figure 5).

In addition to the 2 CJIE1-like elements, 65% (148/227) of genomes showed evidence of a previously described integrated element CJIE4 (29), located in the same chromosomal location in 2 of 4 complete genomes (15AR0984 and 15AR0919) and the reference genome C. jejuni RM1221 (29) (Appendix Figure 6). CJIE4 was identified in isolates from all poultry companies and in 26 of 57 isolates from humans. The dns gene (CJE0256), encoding for an extracellular desoxyribonuclease, was carried in CJIE1 in all but 1 of our isolates (H2239a). However, none of the CJIE1v elements contained the dns gene (CJE0256). Although 149 of 227 C. jejuni ST6964 isolates carried CJIE4, none of the CJIE4 elements had the DNA/RNA nonspecific endonuclease gene (CJE1441) present in the CJIE4 element of strain RM1221.

Discussion

Data from the 4 sources, (i.e., sentinel surveillance, human case survey, direct submission of samples from humans, and samples from poultry) demonstrated rapid emergence of a resistant lineage of C. jejuni among isolates from humans and poultry in New Zealand from 2014 on, indicating how rapidly national levels of resistance can change through the introduction of a successful bacterial clone. Despite high rates of campylobacteriosis in New Zealand, rates of C. jejuni antimicrobial drug resistance have been considered extremely low; during 2000–2013, prevalence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter spp. isolated from humans was reportedly <6% (36). During 2005–2006, no resistance to tetracyclines or fluoroquinolones was found in 193 C. jejuni isolates from poultry (37); a 2009 systematic survey of antimicrobial drug resistance in animal (calves and poultry) isolates of C. jejuni found no resistance to erythromycin, 0.3% resistance to tetracycline, and only 2.3% resistance to fluoroquinolones (38). The emergence of this lineage is unlikely to be the result of fluoroquinolone use in the food chain because the poultry industry in New Zealand does not use fluoroquinolones (39,40).

Our data demonstrate the utility of systematic phenotypic surveillance of antimicrobial drug resistance in C. jejuni, which is becoming increasingly necessary as laboratories adopt routine culture-independent diagnostic testing for enteric pathogens. The use of phenotypic surveillance is particularly relevant for Campylobacter, for which culture-independent diagnostic testing is replacing culture-based diagnosis in many settings (41,42). Although recent whole-genome sequencing–based work demonstrated good concordance between antimicrobial-resistance genotype and phenotype in Campylobacter spp. (43), uncharacterized mutations are unlikely to be detected and isolates are still required for whole-genome sequencing analysis. To ensure ongoing culture capability and the capacity to undertake periodic phenotypic antimicrobial-resistance testing, close liaison between clinical and public health laboratories is needed.

Both the tetO gene and the prophage-integrated element CJIE1v may have originated on the remnant plasmid and been inserted into the genome of ST6964. One possible scenario is that the common ancestor of ST6964 acquired a plasmid similar to megaplasmid pcjDM, which carried the tetO gene and a phage. Under this scenario, the tetO gene was then inserted into the genome at a single site and the phage element was inserted into multiple sites, leaving the remnant plasmid with the backbone minus the tetO and CJIE1v sequences. We propose that the remnant plasmid was then lost from a common ancestor of isolates in poultry company C (Figure 3).

Although the tetO flanking genes in the chromosome differ from the tetO cargo in megaplasmid pcjDM, evidence that these came from the plasmid comes from isolate 15AR1747, which contains additional chromosomal genes adjacent to the tetO sequence that are identical to those found in the remnant plasmid of all other plasmid-bearing C. jejuni ST6964 isolates. Furthermore, these genes are absent from the smaller remnant plasmid identified in 15AR1747 (Appendix Figure 6).

Both CJIE1 and CJIE4 are prophages (29). CJIE1 has been associated with increased adherence and invasion (44) and differences in protein expression under different conditions (45). The multiple locations of prophage-integrated element CJIE1 has been identified in previous studies (29). Previous studies have shown that both CJIE1 and CJIE4 encode nucleases that hydrolyze DNA and inhibit natural transformation (46,47). Prophage-integrated elements in addition to the plasmid may have played some role in the evolution of ST6964 in New Zealand, potentially stabilizing lineages by reducing transformability (47); however, what may have influenced their frequency and distribution among poultry companies and hosts is unclear.

Conclusions

The emergence of antimicrobial-drug resistant C. jejuni ST6964 in New Zealand poultry and transmission to humans via the food chain underlines the role of the fresh poultry supply as a source of human cases of campylobacteriosis and how rapidly new clones can evolve and spread. We provide evidence that this clone has undergone rapid evolution in New Zealand through multiple mechanisms, including mutations/substitutions, conjugation, natural transformation, and the incorporation of prophages into the chromosome. Given its speed of emergence and its spread across vertically integrated poultry companies, it is imperative that ongoing periodic surveillance of antimicrobial drug resistance in Campylobacter and other relevant bacterial pathogens is supported by government agencies to better track the emergence and possible further spread of resistance in New Zealand. This surveillance includes gathering information at the farm level to determine the relative roles of different transmission pathways that could account for spread within and between poultry companies.

Ongoing work indicates that C. jejuni ST6964 is persisting in the poultry supply and continuing to make a considerable contribution to the country’s disease burden. This finding has implications for the use of antimicrobial drugs; for example, fluoroquinolones are likely to be ineffective for treatment of severe and invasive campylobacteriosis. To control and mitigate the spread of this clone, appropriate source control measures and increased public awareness of appropriate food hygiene should be considered by the government and the poultry industry, along with the development of rapid, less costly diagnostic assays, which could be facilitated by data derived from whole-genome sequencing.

Dr. French is chief scientist of the New Zealand Food Safety Science and Research Centre and chair of Food Safety and Veterinary Public Health at Massey University, New Zealand. He is also co-director of One Health Aotearoa and executive director of the Infectious Disease Research Centre at Massey University.

Top

Acknowledgments

We thank Donald Campbell, Helen Heffernan, Dieter Bulach, and Anders Gonçalves da Silva for their help with this manuscript.

Funding was provided by the Ministry of Health, New Zealand; the Ministry for Primary Industries, New Zealand; and the Poultry Industry Association of New Zealand.

Top

References

  1. Kaakoush  NO, Castaño-Rodríguez  N, Mitchell  HM, Man  SM. Global epidemiology of Campylobacter infection. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28:687–720. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sproston  EL, Wimalarathna  HML, Sheppard  SK. Trends in fluoroquinolone resistance in Campylobacter. Microb Genom. 2018;4.
  3. The Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd. Notifiable diseases in New Zealand: annual report 2017 [cited 2019 Oct 9]. https://surv.esr.cri.nz/surveillance/annual_surveillance.php
  4. Sears  A, Baker  MG, Wilson  N, Marshall  J, Muellner  P, Campbell  DM, et al. Marked campylobacteriosis decline after interventions aimed at poultry, New Zealand. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17:1007–15. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Müllner  P, Collins-Emerson  JM, Midwinter  AC, Carter  P, Spencer  SE, van der Logt  P, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni in a geographically isolated country with a uniquely structured poultry industry. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2010;76:2145–54. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. McTavish  SM, Pope  CE, Nicol  C, Sexton  K, French  N, Carter  PE. Wide geographical distribution of internationally rare Campylobacter clones within New Zealand. Epidemiol Infect. 2008;136:1244–52. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Mullner  P, Spencer  SEF, Wilson  DJ, Jones  G, Noble  AD, Midwinter  AC, et al. Assigning the source of human campylobacteriosis in New Zealand: a comparative genetic and epidemiological approach. Infect Genet Evol. 2009;9:1311–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Sheppard  SK, Cheng  L, Méric  G, de Haan  CP, Llarena  A-K, Marttinen  P, et al. Cryptic ecology among host generalist Campylobacter jejuni in domestic animals. Mol Ecol. 2014;23:2442–51. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bolwell  CF, Gilpin  BJ, Campbell  D, French  NP. Evaluation of the representativeness of a sentinel surveillance site for campylobacteriosis. Epidemiol Infect. 2015;143:1990–2002. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Williamson  D, Dyet  K, Heffernan  H. Antimicrobial resistance in human isolates of Campylobacter jejuni, 2015 [cited 2019 Oct 9]. https://surv.esr.cri.nz/PDF_surveillance/Antimicrobial/CAMPY/CampyFQRfinalreport2015.pdf
  11. Nohra  A, Grinberg  A, Midwinter  AC, Marshall  JC, Collins-Emerson  JM, French  NP. Molecular epidemiology of Campylobacter coli strains isolated from different sources in New Zealand between 2005 and 2014. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82:4363–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Wang  G, Clark  CG, Taylor  TM, Pucknell  C, Barton  C, Price  L, et al. Colony multiplex PCR assay for identification and differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. fetus subsp. fetus. J Clin Microbiol. 2002;40:4744–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria, 3rd edition (M45). Wayne (PA): The Institute; 2016.
  14. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0. 2015 [cited 2018 Oct 10]. http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/v_5.0_Breakpoint_Table_01.pdf
  15. Dingle  KE, McCarthy  ND, Cody  AJ, Peto  TE, Maiden  MC. Extended sequence typing of Campylobacter spp., United Kingdom. Emerg Infect Dis. 2008;14:1620–2. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Baines  SL, Howden  BP, Heffernan  H, Stinear  TP, Carter  GP, Seemann  T, et al. Rapid emergence and evolution of Staphylococcus aureus clones harboring fusC-containing staphylococcal cassette chromosome elements. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016;60:2359–65. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Bankevich  A, Nurk  S, Antipov  D, Gurevich  AA, Dvorkin  M, Kulikov  AS, et al. SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–77. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang  J, Xiong  Y, Rogers  L, Carter  GP, French  N. Genome-by-genome approach for fast bacterial genealogical relationship evaluation. Bioinformatics. 2018;34:3025–7. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Huson  DH, Bryant  D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;23:254–67. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Croucher  NJ, Page  AJ, Connor  TR, Delaney  AJ, Keane  JA, Bentley  SD, et al. Rapid phylogenetic analysis of large samples of recombinant bacterial whole genome sequences using Gubbins. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e15. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Cody  AJ, Bray  JE, Jolley  KA, McCarthy  ND, Maiden  MCJ. Core genome multilocus sequence typing scheme for stable, comparative analyses of Campylobacter jejuni and C. coli human disease isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2086–97. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Page  AJ, Taylor  B, Delaney  AJ, Soares  J, Seemann  T, Keane  JA, et al. SNP-sites: rapid efficient extraction of SNPs from multi-FASTA alignments. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000056. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nguyen  LT, Schmidt  HA, von Haeseler  A, Minh  BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32:268–74. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Minh  BQ, Nguyen  MA, von Haeseler  A. Ultrafast approximation for phylogenetic bootstrap. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:1188–95. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Yu  G, Lam  TT, Zhu  H, Guan  Y. Two methods for mapping and visualizing associated data on phylogeny using ggtree. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:3041–3. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hadfield  J, Croucher  NJ, Goater  RJ, Abudahab  K, Aanensen  DM, Harris  SR. Phandango: an interactive viewer for bacterial population genomics. Bioinformatics. 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
  27. Seemann  T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2068–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Llarena  A-K, Zhang  J, Vehkala  M, Välimäki  N, Hakkinen  M, Hänninen  M-L, et al. Monomorphic genotypes within a generalist lineage of Campylobacter jejuni show signs of global dispersion. Microb Genom. 2016;2:e000088. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Parker  CT, Quiñones  B, Miller  WG, Horn  ST, Mandrell  RE. Comparative genomic analysis of Campylobacter jejuni strains reveals diversity due to genomic elements similar to those present in C. jejuni strain RM1221. J Clin Microbiol. 2006;44:4125–35. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Darling  AC, Mau  B, Blattner  FR, Perna  NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14:1394–403. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Alikhan  NF, Petty  NK, Ben Zakour  NL, Beatson  SA. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics. 2011;12:402. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Poly  F, Read  TD, Chen  YH, Monteiro  MA, Serichantalergs  O, Pootong  P, et al. Characterization of two Campylobacter jejuni strains for use in volunteer experimental-infection studies. Infect Immun. 2008;76:5655–67. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Wang  Y, Huang  WM, Taylor  DE. Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the Campylobacter jejuni gyrA gene and characterization of quinolone resistance mutations. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:457–63. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Marasini  D, Fakhr  MK. Whole-genome sequencing of a Campylobacter jejuni strain isolated from retail chicken meat reveals the presence of a megaplasmid with Mu-like prophage and multidrug resistance genes. Genome Announc. 2016;4:e00460–16. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Fouts  DE, Mongodin  EF, Mandrell  RE, Miller  WG, Rasko  DA, Ravel  J, et al. Major structural differences and novel potential virulence mechanisms from the genomes of multiple campylobacter species. PLoS Biol. 2005;3:e15. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. The Institute of Environmental Science and Research Ltd. General antimicrobial susceptibility data collected from hospital and community laboratories [cited 2018 Aug 1]. https://surv.esr.cri.nz/antimicrobial/general_antimicrobial_susceptibility.php
  37. Pleydell  EJ, Rogers  L, Kwan  E, French  NP. Low levels of antibacterial drug resistance expressed by Gram-negative bacteria isolated from poultry carcasses in New Zealand. N Z Vet J. 2010;58:229–36. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Heffernen  H, Wong  T, Lindsay  J, Bowen  B, Woodhouse  R. A baseline survey of antimicrobial resistance in bacteria from selected New Zealand foods, 2009–2010 [cited 2019 Oct 9]. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/21464-a-baseline-survey-of-antimicrobial-resistance-in-bacteria-from-selected-new-zealand-foods-2009-2010
  39. New Zealand Food Safety. Antibiotic sales analysis 2014–2016. Technical paper no. 2018/08 [cited 2019 Oct 9]. https://www.fisheries.govt.nz/dmsdocument/31920/direct
  40. Ministry for Primary Industries. 2011–2014 Antibiotic Sales Analysis. MPI technical paper no. 2016/65 [cited 2019 Oct 9]. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/14497-2011-2014-antibiotic-sales-analysis
  41. Huang  JY, Henao  OL, Griffin  PM, Vugia  DJ, Cronquist  AB, Hurd  S, et al. Infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food and the effect of increasing use of culture-independent diagnostic tests on surveillance—Foodborne Diseases Active Surveillance Network, 10 U.S. Sites, 2012–2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65:368–71. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. May  FJ, Stafford  RJ, Carroll  H, Robson  JM, Vohra  R, Nimmo  GR, et al. The effects of culture independent diagnostic testing on the diagnosis and reporting of enteric bacterial pathogens in Queensland, 2010 to 2014. Commun Dis Intell Q Rep. 2017;41:E223–30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Whitehouse  CA, Young  S, Li  C, Hsu  CH, Martin  G, Zhao  S. Use of whole-genome sequencing for Campylobacter surveillance from NARMS retail poultry in the United States in 2015. Food Microbiol. 2018;73:122–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Clark  CG, Grant  CC, Pollari  F, Marshall  B, Moses  J, Tracz  DM, et al. Effects of the Campylobacter jejuni CJIE1 prophage homologs on adherence and invasion in culture, patient symptoms, and source of infection. BMC Microbiol. 2012;12:269. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Clark  CG, Chong  PM, McCorrister  SJ, Simon  P, Walker  M, Lee  DM, et al. The CJIE1 prophage of Campylobacter jejuni affects protein expression in growth media with and without bile salts. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14:70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Gaasbeek  EJ, Wagenaar  JA, Guilhabert  MR, van Putten  JP, Parker  CT, van der Wal  FJ. Nucleases encoded by the integrated elements CJIE2 and CJIE4 inhibit natural transformation of Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol. 2010;192:936–41. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Gaasbeek  EJ, Wagenaar  JA, Guilhabert  MR, Wösten  MM, van Putten  JP, van der Graaf-van Bloois  L, et al. A DNase encoded by integrated element CJIE1 inhibits natural transformation of Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol. 2009;191:2296–306. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2512.190267

Original Publication Date: October 28, 2019

Table of Contents – Volume 25, Number 12—December 2019

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Nigel P. French, Massey University, New Zealand Food Safety Science and Research Centre, Hopkirk Institute, Palmerston North 4410, New Zealand; email

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: November 18, 2019
Page updated: November 18, 2019
Page reviewed: November 18, 2019
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external