Skip directly to site content Skip directly to page options Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link Skip directly to A-Z link
Volume 29, Number 10—October 2023
Research

Sporadic Shiga Toxin–Producing Escherichia coli–Associated Pediatric Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome, France, 2012–2021

On This Page
Methods
Results
Discussion
Cite This Article
Figures
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Tables
Table 1
Table 2
Downloads
Article
Appendix
RIS [TXT - 2 KB]
Article Metrics
Metric Details
Related Articles
Poultry-Associated Human Salmonella Abortusovis
Detection of Rat Hepatitis E Virus in Pigs, Spain, 2023
Salmonella Infantis Variants in Poultry
More articles on Food Safety
Author affiliations: Santé publique France, Saint-Maurice, France (G. Jones, Y. Le Strat); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Robert Debré, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France (P. Mariani-Kurkdjian, A. Cointe, S. Bonacorsi); Institut Pasteur, Université Paris-Cité, Paris (S. Lefèvre, F.-X. Weill)

Cite This Article

Abstract

Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome (STEC-HUS) remains an important public health risk in France. Cases are primarily sporadic, and geographic heterogeneity has been observed in crude incidence rates. We conducted a retrospective study of 1,255 sporadic pediatric STEC-HUS cases reported during 2012–2021 to describe spatiotemporal dynamics and geographic patterns of higher STEC-HUS risk. Annual case notifications ranged from 109 to 163. Most cases (n = 780 [62%]) were in children <3 years of age. STEC serogroups O26, O80, and O157 accounted for 78% (559/717) of cases with serogroup data. We identified 13 significant space-time clusters and 3 major geographic zones of interest; areas of southeastern France were included in >5 annual space-time clusters. The results of this study have numerous implications for outbreak detection and investigation and research perspectives to improve knowledge of environmental risk factors associated with geographic disparities in STEC-HUS in France.

Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli (STEC) bacteria are responsible for a spectrum of disease, ranging from simple to bloody diarrhea, and pose increased risk for severe complications, including hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in children <5 years of age and the elderly (1). Although STEC infections represent a global burden that is difficult to characterize, in part because of differences in diagnostic capacity and disease surveillance systems, an estimated 2.8 million STEC infections and 3,890 STEC-HUS cases occur annually worldwide (2). Estimated notification rates of STEC infection in Europe during 2017–2021 ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 cases/100,000 population (3).

In France, STEC surveillance is conducted through voluntary clinical and microbiologic surveillance of HUS in children <15 years of age (4). Annual incidence rates for pediatric STEC-HUS in France remain relatively high, and in recent years have been close to estimated notification rates for all STEC infections in Europe (5). Since 1996, annual incidence rates have ranged from 0.6 to 1.5 cases/100,000 population (73 to 168 cases reported annually), and incidence has exceeded 4 cases/100,000 population in children <3 years of age (5). The primary serogroups identified in cases are O26, O80, and O157; an increase of serogroups O26 and O80 in the 2010s coincided with a decrease in O157 (4).

Ruminants are the primary reservoir, excreting STEC in their feces, thereby potentially contaminating food and their environment and posing a risk for STEC contamination in humans (6,7). Although STEC pose a substantial outbreak potential, most infections are sporadic; only 3% of cases reported in France during 2007–2016 were outbreak-associated (4). Determining the source of contamination for sporadic cases is difficult for numerous reasons, including limited epidemiologic data, the multiple potential sources of contamination, and gaps in knowledge about pathogen source–pathway interactions (1,4,8).

Annual incidence rates calculated from pediatric STEC-HUS surveillance in France show regional variations. Space–time cluster detection methods, which can be applied to epidemiologic surveillance for outbreak detection, are also of interest for studying sporadic infectious disease cases. Indeed, several recent studies illustrate such approaches for describing spatiotemporal disease patterns and identifying recurrent geographic clusters representing differences in baseline disease risk, including STEC infection, cryptosporidiosis, and salmonellosis (8–12).

The first objective of our study was to describe temporal trends and geographic distribution of sporadic pediatric STEC-HUS cases in France over a 10-year period. The second objective was to identify space–time clusters and describe geographic patterns of significantly higher risk for sporadic STEC-HUS at a fine geographic scale. Such data are crucial for enabling epidemiologic surveillance, including assessment of clusters requiring epidemiologic investigations. In addition, robust, statistically significant data identifying geographic disparities at a fine scale open perspectives for further research aiming to better understand potential environmental, sociodemographic, and even behavioral factors associated with observed differences.

Methods

Data Sources and Processing

Cases of suspected STEC-HUS in children <15 years of age are reported to Santé publique France (France’s national public health agency) according to previously described clinical criteria (4). Surveillance data include demographic information (age, sex, and postal codes of residence and temporary stay), clinical data (diarrhea, date of diarrhea onset, and date of HUS diagnosis), results of stool analysis, and limited epidemiologic information (outbreak-related [community, childcare, or family setting] and primary at-risk exposures). In accordance with data protection procedures defined by France’s oversight authority for privacy and data protection (Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés), age, postal codes, dates of diarrhea onset, and HUS diagnosis are conserved indefinitely for surveillance purposes.

Microbiologic STEC surveillance is voluntary and coordinated by the National Reference Center (NRC) for Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Shigella (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) and its associated laboratory (University Hospital Robert Debré, Assistance publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris) (4). Over the entire study period, NRC conducted PCR testing of stool samples to detect virulence genes (stx1, stx2, eae, and ehxA) and O-antigen biosynthesis genes of the 10 most frequent STEC serogroups identified in France (O157, O26, O103, O145, O91, O121, O104, O55, O111, and O80 [in 2013]). NRC performed culture on all stx- or eae-positive stools. Serogrouping methods evolved over the study period (13,14) (Appendix).

We identified 1,419 notified pediatric STEC-HUS cases with symptom onset during January 1, 2012–December 31, 2021, from surveillance data. For cases with no diarrhea, we used date of HUS diagnosis. We defined sporadic cases as those having no documented epidemiologic link to other confirmed STEC or STEC-HUS cases. For cases of person-to-person transmission in a family or childcare setting, the first case was retained for analysis because the index case is considered a sporadic case potentially associated with geographically specific exposures. We excluded from analysis all foodborne or environmentally associated outbreak cases and cases in patients with reported international travel during the entire exposure period. We were able to link cases with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data for 2018–2021. We retained in the analysis cases belonging to a WGS-linked cluster but with no common source of infection suspected from epidemiologic investigations. Also, we excluded cases with no postal code available because they could not be geocoded. Postal codes of temporary stay correspond to locations visited in France in the week before diarrhea onset. Furthermore, we restricted analyses to cases reported from mainland France. In total, we excluded 164 (12%) of 1,419 reported cases.

We used population data for children <15 years of age available for the period 2012–2018 from the National Institute for Statistics and Economic Studies. For the remaining study period of 2019–2021, we used the most recent census data available (2018). Geocoding of cases used postal code of residence or of temporary stay when available (n = 5).

We obtained all study data from anonymous surveillance data conserved by Santé publique France according to an ongoing authorization by the Commission Nationale de l’Informatique et des Libertés. No additional ethics approval was required.

Temporal and Spatial Analyses

We described temporal and spatial distributions for all cases and by subgroups for 2 variables of epidemiologic importance, age of patient and STEC serogroup. We defined 6 age groups on the basis of observed distribution in STEC-HUS incidence from surveillance data: <1 year, 1 year, 2 years, 3–4 years, 5–9 years, 10–14 years. Those groups were also statistically pertinent for calculation of standardized incidence rates. We conducted serogroup-specific subgroup analyses for the 3 most frequently identified serogroups in pediatric STEC-HUS cases in France, O26, O80, and O157 (top-3 serogroups). For other serogroups, the number of isolates was insufficient for subgroup analysis (mean <5 isolates/year). We classified cases into 4 groups (Appendix): top-3 serogroups, other serogroup, no serogrouping, and ungroupable. We retained for overall analysis children with HUS but no microbiologic confirmation of STEC infection on the basis of clinical criteria (diarrhea before HUS) and the fact that in young children, HUS is largely associated with STEC infection (4).

We described temporal trends and spatial distribution by using age-standardized incidence rates calculated by the direct method. We represented spatial distribution at the administrative department level (n = 95). By using a moving average method, we decomposed monthly incidence rates into trend, season, and residual components through the decompose function with an additive model using R version 4.2 (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, https://www.r-project.org).

Space-time Scan Statistics

We conducted a retrospective analysis for space-time cluster detection using SaTScan version 9.7 (https://www.satscan.org), including all cases and for each of the top-3 serogroups. We geocoded all cases to the établissement public de cooperation intercommunale (EPCI), a geographic unit that groups municipalities on the basis of administrative criteria (1,233 EPCI are in mainland France). The scan statistic tests whether cases are randomly distributed over space and time and identifies clusters for which a significant difference exists in the number of observed cases compared with expected cases (15,16). For each cluster, the main outputs were geographic information (coordinates of the center of the circle and radius); cluster time interval by date, population size, and number of observed and expected cases; relative risk; and p value. We considered clusters significant at p<0.05.

We used a discrete Poisson model because of high spatial resolution of the geographic unit of analysis and the rare occurrence of STEC-HUS cases (<1 case for most ECPIs). We included age as a covariable for all analyses. We chose different tuning parameters to assess their effect on results. On the basis of the sensitivity analysis, we restricted the maximum radius of the circular scan window to 100 km and maximum geographic cluster size to 10% of the population at risk. We set the time precision unit to days with a maximum cluster duration of 90 days to account for observed seasonality of STEC-HUS (8,11). We retained a minimum number of cases (cluster restriction) of 2. We performed space–time scans over the 10-year study period and annually. On the basis of the results of annual space–time scans, we calculated the cluster recurrence index developed by Boudou et al. to identify geographic areas where significant clusters occurred at least once during the study period (10). We conducted all statistical analyses by using R version 4.2 and SaTScan version 9.7 (17).

Results

Number of Cases over Time

Figure 1

Annual reported number of sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021. A) All cases; B) cases of infection with serogroups O26, O80, and O157.

Figure 1. Annual reported number of sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021. A) All cases; B) cases of infection with serogroups O26, O80, and...

A total of 1,255 sporadic pediatric STEC-HUS cases were reported during January 2012–December 2021; the annual number of cases ranged from 109 in 2014 and in 2015 to 163 in 2017 (Figure 1). Cases were distributed in 542 (44%) of 1,233 EPCIs. A sample was sent to NRC for 1,132 (90%) cases, and 717 (63%) of those had a STEC serogroup identified (Appendix Table 1, Figure 1). The top-3 serogroups accounted for 78% (559/717) of cases with serogroup data: O26, 228 cases (41%); O80, 149 cases (27%); and O157, 182 cases (33%). Approximately 23% (255/1,132) of cases were ungroupable. The 283 (23%) cases with no serogrouping consisted of 123 with no sample sent to NRC (24 [20%] with reported PCR detection of stx at the notifying hospital) and 160 that were negative at NRC (PCR stx or serologic tests). For the 259 cases with no stx detection or negative serologic tests, 95% (247) were in patients who had diarrhea before HUS.

Figure 2

Age-standardized annual incidence rates of reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, for all cases and cases of infection with serogroups O26, O80, and O157, France, 2012–2021.

Figure 2. Age-standardized annual incidence rates of reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, for all cases and cases of infection with serogroups O26, O80, and...

We observed no overall trend in the annual number of sporadic cases notified or in age-standardized annual incidence rates during 2012–2021. However, for STEC O26 and O80, we observed a significant increasing trend, in parallel to a significant decreasing trend for O157 (Figures 1, 2).

Figure 3

Number of reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, by age group and sex, and incidence rate, by age group (black dots), France, 2012–2021. Data were missing on sex for 3 cases (1 case each in patients <1 year, 3 years, and 4 years of age).

Figure 3. Number of reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, by age group and sex, and incidence rate, by age group (black dots), France, 2012–2021....

The proportions of female and male case-patients were comparable over the entire study period (Figure 3). Most cases (780/1,255 [62%]) were in patients <3 years of age. Incidence rate varied by age group; the highest incidence was in children 1–2 years of age (4.9 cases/100,000 population) (Figure 3). Incidence rate by age varied slightly by serogroup; the highest incidence was in younger age groups (1–2 years) for STEC O80 (0.9 cases/100,000 population) and STEC O26 (1 case/100,000 population), compared with incidence in that age group for STEC O157 (0.2 cases/100,000 population).

Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Incidence Rates

Seasonal decomposition of all sporadic STEC-HUS cases confirmed seasonality with a distinct annual peak (Appendix Figure 2). Annual peaks also were observed for the top-3 serogroups but with associated secondary and tertiary peaks between the primary seasonal peaks.

Figure 4

Monthly age-standardized incidence rates of reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021.

Figure 4. Monthly age-standardized incidence rates of reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021.

Figure 5

Geographic distribution of age-standardized incidence rates of all reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021. A) 2012; B) 2013; C) 2014; D) 2015; E) 2016; F) 2017; G) 2018; H) 2019; I) 2020; J) 2021.

Figure 5. Geographic distribution of age-standardized incidence rates of all reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021. A) 2012; B) 2013; C) 2014; D)...

Seasonality was observed in monthly age-standardized incidence rates for each year of the study period. The highest incidence occurred in summer and early fall (July–October) (Figure 4). No clear spatial trends in annual age-standardized incidence rates were evident during the study period. The departments with the highest incidence rates varied from 1 year to the next (Figure 5).

Figure 6

Geographic distribution of age-standardized incidence rates of reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases caused by serogroups O26, O80, and O157, France, 2012–2021. A–C) Serogroups O26 (A), O80 (B), and O157 (C) during 2012–2016. D–F) Serogroups O26 (D), O80 (E), and O157 (F) during 2017–2021.

Figure 6. Geographic distribution of age-standardized incidence rates of reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases caused by serogroups O26, O80, and O157, France, 2012–2021. A–C)...

We described spatial distribution for the top-3 serogroups over 2 periods (2012–2016 and 2017–2021) to account for a smaller number of cases. For STEC O26, we observed a geographic extension of cases when comparing the 2012–2016 period to the 2017–2021 period (Figure 6). We observed a similar evolution for STEC O80. For STEC O26 and STEC O80, departments in the eastern half of France had slightly higher incidence rates. For STEC O157, the highest incidence rates were primarily in departments in northwest France, regardless of the period.

Space–Time Scanning

Figure 7

Significant clusters detected by space–time scanning of all reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021.

Figure 7. Significant clusters detected by space–time scanning of all reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021.

Space–time scanning of all cases over the entire 10-year period identified 2 significant clusters occurring in 2019 and 2013, primarily in 2 regions in eastern France (Table 1; Figure 7). Scanning over the 10-year period by serogroup identified 2 significant clusters: STEC O26 (2019, southeast France) and STEC O80 (2017, northeast France) (Appendix Table 2, Figure 3). WGS data available for the isolates within the 2019 O26 space-time cluster identified 3 WGS-linked clusters of 2 isolates each (EnteroBase [https://enterobase.readthedocs.io] cgMLST scheme, HC5 level) (14). Short-read sequences are available in EnteroBase (identification nos. 201904732, 201904733, 201905626, 201905634, 201907203, and 201908310) and in the European Nucleotide Archive (study no. PRJEB50273). For each pair of WGS-linked isolates, epidemiologic investigations did not identify a suspected common source of infection.

Figure 8

Significant clusters detected by annual space–time scanning of all reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021. A) 2012; B) 2013; C) 2015; D) 2016; E) 2018; F) 2019; G) 2020; H) 2021; I) 2012–2021.

Figure 8. Significant clusters detected by annual space–time scanning of all reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021. A) 2012; B) 2013; C) 2015;...

Annual space–time scanning identified 13 significant space–time clusters (Table 2; Figure 8). We identified >1 significant cluster for each year, with the exception of 2014 and 2017, and detected a maximum of 3 significant clusters in 2018. Median cluster size was 10 cases (range 2–20 cases). Clusters occurred exclusively in the period of June–November, and most clusters corresponded to the seasonal peak observed in STEC-HUS notifications during July–October. Annual scanning by serogroup did not identify any significant space–time clusters.

Figure 9

Cluster recurrence index of all reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021.

Figure 9. Cluster recurrence index of all reported sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli–associated pediatric hemolytic uremic syndrome cases, France, 2012–2021.

The cluster recurrence index ranged from zero to 7 and identified an area of particularly high recurrence in southeast France; certain EPCIs were included in >5 clusters during the study period (Figure 9). Two additional major geographic zones were identified as hotspots, although to a lesser degree, in the northwest and northeast.

Discussion

During 2012–2021, a mean of 125 cases of sporadic pediatric STEC-HUS were reported in France annually. Incidence was highest in children <3 years of age, and particularly in children 1–2 years of age (an incidence 1.7 times greater than that observed in children <1 year of age and 2 times greater than that observed in children 2–3 years of age). Analysis of temporal trends by serogroup showed the increase of HUS-associated STEC O26 and STEC O80 in parallel to the decrease in STEC O157. Similar trends have been observed in other countries of Europe (3,18). Department-level age-standardized incidence rates showed geographic heterogeneity and no clear patterns when considering all STEC-HUS cases. Subgroup analysis showed the geographic extension of STEC O26 and STEC 80.

Annual space–time scanning identified 13 significant clusters occurring over a 10-year period and confirmed geographic disparities in cases. Significant clusters occurred almost exclusively during the seasonal peak of STEC-HUS observed during July–October. Application of the cluster recurrence index identified several geographic zones of interest, in particular southeast France, with certain EPCIs included in >5 recurrent space–time clusters. This zone is in the second most densely populated region in France and includes a major city, Lyon, but also rural areas and high cattle density (19). To a lesser extent, we identified notable space–time clusters in regions in northwest and northeast France (1–2 clusters during the study period). In contrast to the southeast, those regions are less populated and have smaller population centers. As in southeast France, cattle density is higher than elsewhere in France (19).

One limitation of our analysis is that we hypothesized that sensitivity of reporting was constant over space and time for the 10-year study period. Previous studies estimated sensitivity of reporting at 66% during 2002–2003 and 85% during 2016–2017 (20; Santé publique France, unpub. data). Variations may have occurred in the sensitivity of reporting over time or between regions. In particular, the occurrence of outbreaks might improve reporting because of greater awareness among clinicians after outbreak events. Of note, several foodborne STEC-HUS outbreaks with wide media coverage occurred during 2018–2019 (21–23). However, several aspects of the surveillance system limit potential bias. In particular, the surveillance system has been in place since 1996 and has a stable network of specialized hospital units, enabling Santé publique France to be in regular contact with clinicians and maintain a high level of awareness for reporting of cases. In addition, an annual reminder is sent to all participating hospital units asking them to notify any cases missed during the previous year. Therefore, our retrospective analysis is less likely to be affected by heterogeneous reporting.

Moreover, space–time analysis relied on EPCIs under the hypothesis that the at-risk STEC exposure occurred in the place of residence or in another reported place of exposure in France. However, case-patients may have more limited geographic movements corresponding to at-risk exposures that are not documented in surveillance data. In this case, the documented EPCI would not correspond to the actual geographic area of at-risk exposure, but because EPCIs corresponds to grouped municipalities, this factor should limit the potential bias.

Furthermore, microbiologic data was limited for some cases, and microbiologic surveillance evolved over the 10-year study period. Including cases based solely on clinical criteria may have resulted in non–STEC-related HUS. However, almost all case-patients had diarrhea before HUS, and detection of stx genes may be hindered by several factors, including antibiotic treatment and the delay between diarrhea onset and sampling. Because postdiarrheal HUS in young children is largely attributable to STEC infection, we considered the limited risk for including non–STEC-associated cases (4). In addition, the power of the serogroup analysis is probably reduced by the fact that not all reported cases had a stool sample sent to NRC for analysis or that no serogroup was identified for some cases. Introducing routine WGS data into epidemiologic surveillance in 2017 has improved characterization of isolates and detection of related strains and of potential outbreaks (e.g., those with diffuse or fewer cases) (24–26). As a result, the capacity to detect outbreak cases from pediatric STEC-HUS surveillance in France evolved, and during 2012–2016, cases belonging to smaller outbreaks possibly were not detected and would be misclassified as sporadic cases in our study. A possible result of such misclassification could be a greater number of space-time clusters identified during this period compared with 2017–2021. However, this difference did not occur; the number of space-time clusters per year is comparable between the periods before and after introduction of WGS. Also, although WGS results can suggest potential links between isolates, Besser et al. discussed the importance of epidemiologic investigations in the assessment of WGS-linked isolates (24), and the existence of a common source cannot be assumed. We therefore excluded WGS-linked isolates only if epidemiologic investigation suspected a common source of infection.

Space-time cluster detection is sensitive to the selection of parameters in SaTScan. Chen et al. discussed the challenges and potential effect of those parameter choices (27), and published studies offer limited guidance for parameter choice, in particular given differences in characteristics of diseases and study populations. To limit the influence of parameter choice on results, we conducted a sensitivity analysis, and our selected parameters produced robust results even when individual parameters, such as maximum population at risk, varied. We considered a maximum radius of 100 km for the scanning window as relevant for this study because the underlying hypothesis is that higher relative risk for sporadic STEC-HUS in certain geographic areas may be caused by unidentified environmental factors. Therefore, identifying clusters with unlimited radii is not epidemiologically relevant.

Our study adds to an existing body of research demonstrating the effect of applying scan statistics to describe spatiotemporal dynamics of sporadic disease, even for more rare occurrences. Our results provide important insight into the epidemiologic context and have implications for outbreak detection and investigation and for research perspectives to improve knowledge of risk factors associated with geographic disparities in disease. The identification of several geographic areas with recurring clusters of sporadic STEC-HUS confirms statistically, and at a much finer geographic scale, previous observations of disparities in regional incidence of pediatric STEC-HUS in France (4,19). Taking into account geographic differences is relevant to analysis of surveillance data for outbreak detection purposes, in particular for evaluating epidemiologic signals and the decision to initiate investigations. The different geographic relative risks identified in this study will be integrated into SaTScan as part of ongoing research into its application for outbreak detection in France (28). Compared with WGS, statistical space-time cluster detection provides a reactive approach that can be applied to case notification data before WGS data are available (e.g., delays of ≈3 weeks in France) or in absence of strain isolation.

Our study also provides the necessary data and justification for further research on geographic factors associated with a higher baseline risk for STEC-HUS in France. Ecologic studies conducted in several countries using STEC surveillance data have identified significant associations with ruminant density, rural classification, and water sources, in particular private well usage (9,29–32). The findings of a study in France by Haus-Cheymol et al. suggested an association between pediatric STEC-HUS incidence and dairy cattle and calf density. The described geographic distribution of higher dairy cattle density in that study overlaps in part with the higher-risk geographic zones identified in our study in northwest and eastern France (19). However, the study merits an update because it is from the early 2000s, is limited to a more macroscopic geographic level, and covers a period before several observed evolutions in STEC epidemiology in France.

Our analysis also identified significant, recurring, space-time clusters consisting of cases with different serogroups. This finding suggests conditions favorable for STEC transmission that may contribute to higher risk for STEC-HUS, including geographic differences that could influence STEC risk because of different patterns of food and environmental exposures through a range of transmission pathways. We plan to use our results in further studies aimed at exploring the association with environmental parameters potentially underlying STEC-HUS risk in France. Conducting such a study at a finer geographic scale would aim to provide improved insight for public health professionals to target and adapt public health interventions, including communication with the general population, aimed at STEC prevention.

Ms. Jones is an epidemiologist for Santé publique France, the national public health agency of France, working in foodborne disease surveillance and outbreak investigation. Her primary research interests include surveillance of STEC infections and STEC-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome and viral gastroenteritis.

Top

Acknowledgment

We thank Henriette de Valk and Harold Noel for their attentive reading of the manuscript and helpful suggestions.

Top

References

  1. Joseph  A, Cointe  A, Mariani Kurkdjian  P, Rafat  C, Hertig  A. Shiga toxin–associated hemolytic uremic syndrome: a narrative review. Toxins (Basel). 2020;12:67. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Majowicz  SE, Scallan  E, Jones-Bitton  A, Sargeant  JM, Stapleton  J, Angulo  FJ, et al. Global incidence of human Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections and deaths: a systematic review and knowledge synthesis. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2014;11:447–55. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. STEC infection: annual epidemiological report for 2021. 2022 [cited 2023 Jan 15]. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/AER%20STEC%20-%202021.pdf
  4. Bruyand  M, Mariani-Kurkdjian  P, Le Hello  S, King  LA, Van Cauteren  D, Lefevre  S, et al.; Réseau français hospitalier de surveillance du SHU pédiatrique. Paediatric haemolytic uraemic syndrome related to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli, an overview of 10 years of surveillance in France, 2007 to 2016. Euro Surveill. 2019;24:1800068. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Jones  G, Mariani-Kurkdjian  P, Cointe  A, Bonacorsi  S, Lefèvre  S, Pardos de la Gandara  M, et al. Annual report for surveillance of hemolytic uremic syndrome in children under 15 years old, France 2021 [in French]. 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 1]. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/maladies-infectieuses-d-origine-alimentaire/syndrome-hemolytique-et-uremique-pediatrique/documents/bulletin-national/donnees-de-surveillance-du-syndrome-hemolytique-et-uremique-en-2021
  6. Kintz  E, Brainard  J, Hooper  L, Hunter  P. Transmission pathways for sporadic Shiga-toxin producing E. coli infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Hyg Environ Health. 2017;220:57–67. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Augustin  J-C, Kooh  P, Mughini-Gras  L, Guillier  L, Thébault  A, Audiat-Perrin  F, et al. Risk factors for sporadic infections caused by Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Risk Anal. 2021;17:17. DOIGoogle Scholar
  8. Cleary  E, Boudou  M, Garvey  P, Aiseadha  CO, McKeown  P, O’Dwyer  J, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of sporadic Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli enteritis, Ireland, 2013-2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2021;27:2421–33. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Brehony  C, Cullinan  J, Cormican  M, Morris  D. Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli incidence is related to small area variation in cattle density in a region in Ireland. Sci Total Environ. 2018;637-638:865–70. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Boudou  M, Cleary  E, ÓhAiseadha  C, Garvey  P, McKeown  P, O’Dwyer  J, et al. Spatiotemporal epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in the Republic of Ireland, 2008-2017: development of a space-time “cluster recurrence” index. BMC Infect Dis. 2021;21:880. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Li  X, Singh  N, Havelaar  AH, Blackburn  JK. Geographical distribution and space-time clustering of human illnesses with major Salmonella serotypes in Florida, USA, 2017-2018. Epidemiol Infect. 2022;150:e175. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Varga  C, John  P, Cooke  M, Majowicz  SE. Area-level clustering of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli infections and their socioeconomic and demographic factors in Ontario, Canada: an ecological study. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2021;18:438–47. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. King  LA, Nogareda  F, Weill  F-X, Mariani-Kurkdjian  P, Loukiadis  E, Gault  G, et al. Outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O104:H4 associated with organic fenugreek sprouts, France, June 2011. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54:1588–94. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Zhou  Z, Alikhan  NF, Mohamed  K, Fan  Y, Achtman  M; Agama Study Group. The EnteroBase user’s guide, with case studies on Salmonella transmissions, Yersinia pestis phylogeny, and Escherichia core genomic diversity. Genome Res. 2020;30:138–52. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kulldorff  M, Athas  WF, Feurer  EJ, Miller  BA, Key  CR. Evaluating cluster alarms: a space-time scan statistic and brain cancer in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1377–80. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kulldorff  M, Heffernan  R, Hartman  J, Assunção  R, Mostashari  F. A space-time permutation scan statistic for disease outbreak detection. PLoS Med. 2005;2:e59. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2021 [cited 2022 Apr 1]. https://www.r-project.org
  18. Cointe  A, Birgy  A, Mariani-Kurkdjian  P, Liguori  S, Courroux  C, Blanco  J, et al. Emerging multidrug-resistant hybrid pathotype Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O80 and related strains of clonal complex 165, Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:2262–9. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Haus-Cheymol  R, Espie  E, Che  D, Vaillant  V, DE Valk  H, Desenclos  JC. Association between indicators of cattle density and incidence of paediatric haemolytic-uraemic syndrome (HUS) in children under 15 years of age in France between 1996 and 2001: an ecological study. Epidemiol Infect. 2006;134:712–8. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Espié  E, Grimont  F, Mariani-Kurkdjian  P, Bouvet  P, Haeghebaert  S, Filliol  I, et al. Surveillance of hemolytic uremic syndrome in children less than 15 years of age, a system to monitor O157 and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections in France, 1996-2006. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2008;27:595–601. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Santé publique France. Two cases of hemolytic uremic syndrome with a probable link to consumption of contaminated reblochon cheese [in French]. 2018 Dec 20 [cited 2023 Dec 1]. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/les-actualites/2018/deux-cas-de-syndrome-hemolytique-et-uremique-en-lien-probable-avec-la-consommation-de-reblochon-contamine
  22. Jones  G, Lefèvre  S, Donguy  MP, Nisavanh  A, Terpant  G, Fougère  E, et al. Outbreak of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) O26 paediatric haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS) cases associated with the consumption of soft raw cow’s milk cheeses, France, March to May 2019. Euro Surveill. 2019;24:1900305. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jones  G, de Valk  H. Outbreak of Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli O26 linked to consumption of raw milk reblochon cheese, France, March–May 2018 [in French]. 2020 [cited 2022 Dec 1]. https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/maladies-et-traumatismes/maladies-infectieuses-d-origine-alimentaire/syndrome-hemolytique-et-uremique-pediatrique/documents/rapport-synthese/epidemie-d-infections-a-escherichia-coli-o26-producteur-de-shiga-toxines-liees-a-la-consommation-de-reblochon-au-lait-cru.-france-mars-mai-2018
  24. Besser  JM, Carleton  HA, Trees  E, Stroika  SG, Hise  K, Wise  M, et al. Interpretation of whole-genome sequencing for enteric disease surveillance and outbreak investigation. Foodborne Pathog Dis. 2019;16:504–12. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Dallman  TJ, Byrne  L, Ashton  PM, Cowley  LA, Perry  NT, Adak  G, et al. Whole-genome sequencing for national surveillance of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61:305–12. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Moura  A, Criscuolo  A, Pouseele  H, Maury  MM, Leclercq  A, Tarr  C, et al. Whole genome-based population biology and epidemiological surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes. Nat Microbiol. 2016;2:16185. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Chen  J, Roth  RE, Naito  AT, Lengerich  EJ, Maceachren  AM. Geovisual analytics to enhance spatial scan statistic interpretation: an analysis of U.S. cervical cancer mortality. Int J Health Geogr. 2008;7:57. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Robertson  C, Nelson  TA, MacNab  YC, Lawson  AB. Review of methods for space-time disease surveillance. Spat Spatio-Temporal Epidemiol. 2010;1:105–16. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Frank  C, Kapfhammer  S, Werber  D, Stark  K, Held  L. Cattle density and Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection in Germany: increased risk for most but not all serogroups. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2008;8:635–43. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Elson  R, Grace  K, Vivancos  R, Jenkins  C, Adak  GK, O’Brien  SJ, et al. A spatial and temporal analysis of risk factors associated with sporadic Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli O157 infection in England between 2009 and 2015. Epidemiol Infect. 2018;146:1928–39. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Odoi  A, Martin  SW, Michel  P, Middleton  D, Holt  J, Wilson  J. Investigation of clusters of giardiasis using GIS and a spatial scan statistic. Int J Health Geogr. 2004;3:11. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Óhaiseadha  C, Hynds  PD, Fallon  UB, O’Dwyer  J. A geostatistical investigation of agricultural and infrastructural risk factors associated with primary verotoxigenic E. coli (VTEC) infection in the Republic of Ireland, 2008-2013. Epidemiol Infect. 2017;145:95–105. DOIPubMedGoogle Scholar

Top

Figures
Tables

Top

Cite This Article

DOI: 10.3201/eid2910.230382

Original Publication Date: September 11, 2023

Table of Contents – Volume 29, Number 10—October 2023

EID Search Options
presentation_01 Advanced Article Search – Search articles by author and/or keyword.
presentation_01 Articles by Country Search – Search articles by the topic country.
presentation_01 Article Type Search – Search articles by article type and issue.

Top

Comments

Please use the form below to submit correspondence to the authors or contact them at the following address:

Gabrielle Jones, Santé publique France, Direction des Maladies Infectieuses, 12 rue du Val d’Osne, 94415 Saint-Maurice CEDEX, France

Send To

10000 character(s) remaining.

Top

Page created: August 18, 2023
Page updated: September 20, 2023
Page reviewed: September 20, 2023
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
file_external