Volume 3, Number 1—March 1997
Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae
On This Page
Fluoroquinolones and broad-spectrum cephalosporins are the most effective antimicrobial agents for the treatment of gonorrhea. However, clinically significant resistance to fluoroquinolones has emerged in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Fluoroquinolone-resistant strains account for approximately 10% of all gonococcal strains in Hong Kong and the Republic of the Philippines. As many as 50% of strains from some Far Eastern countries exhibit decreased susceptibility (intermediate resistance) to fluoroquinolones. Strains with intermediate resistance and clinically significant resistance are being isolated sporadically in North America, where resistant strains have been associated with an outbreak and with failure of infections to respond to treatment with doses of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; strains exhibiting decreased susceptibility to these agents are endemic in at least one metropolitan area. Monitoring for fluoroquinolone resistance is now critical for ensuring adequate treatment of infections with resistant strains and for maximizing the time during which fluoroquinolones may be used to treat gonorrhea.
Gonorrhea is among the most prevalent sexually transmitted diseases throughout much of the world. The emergence of resistance to antimicrobial agents in Neisseria gonorrhoeae is a major obstacle in the control of gonorrhea. In 1989 and 1993, in response to the increasing frequency of isolation of penicillin-, tetracycline-, and spectinomycin-resistant strains of N. gonorrhoeae in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended the use of broad-spectrum cephalosporins or fluoroquinolones for the primary treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea (1,2). However, resistance to fluoroquinolones has now emerged in N. gonorrhoeae (3-8). Because ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin are more frequently used to treat gonorrhea than other fluoroquinolones, this synopsis will focus on these agents.
In 1993, CDC recommended single-dose, oral therapy with ciprofloxacin (500 mg) or ofloxacin (400 mg) as two of the primary regimens for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea (2). Enoxacin (400 mg), lomefloxacin (400 mg), and norfloxacin (800 mg) were recommended among alternative regimens (2). In some countries, gonococcal infections have been treated with a single, orally administered dose of 250 mg ciprofloxacin (8). The failure of gonococcal infections to respond to treatment with 250 mg ciprofloxacin has been reported in the United Kingdom since 1990 (8-11). The failure of infections to respond to single-dose therapy with 500 mg ciprofloxacin or 400 mg ofloxacin has been reported in the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, Hong Kong, and the United States (3-7,12).
Different methods for determining in vitro antimicrobial susceptibilities of N. gonorrhoeae have been developed in several countries. Differences between these methods—the medium on which the susceptibilities are determined, the concentrations of antimicrobial agents tested, the concentration of antimicrobial agents in disks used to determine zone inhibition diameters, or the inoculum size—complicate the interpretation of susceptibility test results. For example, in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Hong Kong, susceptibilities are usually determined on Isosensitest medium (Oxoid, Basingstoke, United Kingdom) (3,8,13-15). In the United States (where criteria for interpreting susceptibilities of N. gonorrhoeae are established by the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards [NCCLS]) and Canada, susceptibilities are determined on a Difco or Becton Dickinson base medium (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, MI; Becton Dickinson, Cockeysville, MD) (16-19). Antimicrobial susceptibilities determined on Oxoid base medium may be one concentration lower than those determined on supplemented Difco or Becton Dickinson base media (15). Neither method is right or wrong; nor is one method better than the other; they are different. The method used in different countries is influenced by the commercial availability of the base medium. Thus, criteria for interpreting susceptibilities in the United States and Canada may differ slightly from those used to interpret susceptibilities in the United Kingdom, Australia, and Hong Kong, reflecting the difference in susceptibilities obtained on different media. Similarly, when susceptibilities are measured on media different from those described above it may be necessary to establish "local" criteria using reference strains with known susceptibilities.
Gonococcal strains associated with therapy failure to 250 mg ciprofloxacin have had minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of ≥0.06 to 0.25 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin (8,11); posttreatment strains from infections that failed to respond to treatment with 500 mg ciprofloxacin or 400 mg ofloxacin have had MICs≥1.0 µg/ml and ≥2.0 µg/ml, respectively (4-6,12,15).
Before the emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae, NCCLS established interpretive criteria to differentiate between susceptible strains and those exhibiting decreased susceptibility to selected fluoroquinolones including ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, lomefloxacin, and enoxacin (16,17). Criteria for the interpretation of clinically significant resistance of gonococcal strains to 500 mg ciprofloxacin and 400 mg ofloxacin have been proposed (6,18).
Criteria for interpreting susceptibilities of N. gonorrhoeae to antimicrobial agents should be based on treatment outcome and strain susceptibility data. However, because many infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant strains were treated with broad-spectrum cephalosporins and few observations linked fluoroquinolone therapy outcome and antimicrobial susceptibilities (MICs), CDC proposed criteria for interpreting fluoroquinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae that were based on theoretical predictions of the MICs at which gonococcal infections may fail to respond to CDC-recommended doses of selected fluoroquinolones (18). On the basis of the therapeutic index (calculated by dividing the peak level of the agent in serum by the MIC of the infecting strain), CDC proposed criteria for interpreting susceptibilities to selected fluoroquinolones (Table) (18,20). These criteria were consistent with the MICs of isolates from the observed treatment failures to 500 mg ciprofloxacin and 400 mg ofloxacin documented at the time of the study (4,5,12). Recently, Kam et al. proposed interpretive criteria based on the susceptibilities of many strains that did not respond to treatment with ofloxacin in Hong Kong (Table) (6). CDC and Kam et al. proposed identical MICs for interpreting resistance to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin: MICs of ≥2.0 µg/ml and ≥1.0 µg/ml of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin, respectively. These criteria have also been adopted in Australia (15).
In the United Kingdom, where 250 mg ciprofloxacin has been used to treat gonorrhea, strains with MICs of 0.06 to 0.25 µg/ml have been isolated from infections that did not respond to treatment (8,11). Ciprofloxacin in a 250-mg dose produces a peak serum level of approximately 1.2 µg/ml; thus, strains with MICs of ≥0.25 to 0.5 µg/ml would produce therapeutic indices of 4.8:1 and 2.4:1, respectively. These calculated MICs suggest that strains with MICs ≥0.25 µg/ml should be considered resistant to treatment with 250 mg ciprofloxacin. Criteria for interpreting susceptibilities of gonococcal strains to treatment with 250 mg ciprofloxacin have been determined to ciprofloxacin (1 µg disks) or nalidixic acid (30 µg disks) (10,21). Measurement of nalidixic acid resistance may be useful for detecting strains causing infections that may not respond to treatment with 250 mg ciprofloxacin. However, because naladixic acid-resistance indicates decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin, this test does not differentiate between strains with intermediate resistance and clinically significant resistance to treatment with 500 mg ciprofloxacin or 400 mg ofloxacin (18).
Strains exhibiting intermediate resistance (MICs 0.125 to 0.5 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin; MICs 0.5-1.0 µg/ml of ofloxacin) have been reported from many geographic areas including Australia, Canada, the Canary Islands, Hong Kong, Japan, the Republic of the Philippines, mainland Spain, Thailand, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the West Indies (4,7,9-15,21-32). Fluoroquinolone resistance (MICs of ≥1.0 µg/ml or ≥2.0 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin, respectively) has been reported most frequently from the Far East, Republic of the Philippines, Hong Kong, Japan) and less frequently from Australia, Canada, Spain, Thailand, United Kingdom, and the United States (3,4,6,7,9,12,15,22-32). Ofloxacin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant strains had been isolated sporadically in Hong Kong, the Republic of the Philippines, and Thailand for some years (22-24). The frequency of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains has increased dramatically since the early 1990s. For example, in Hong Kong, fluoroquinolone-resistant strains were isolated intermittently during 1990 to 1992 (13) but have increased dramatically from an estimated 0.5% in late 1992 to 10.4% in late 1994 (14).
From 1994 to 1995, strains exhibiting decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin accounted for approximately 36%, 54%, and 22% of strains in Hong Kong, the Republic of the Philippines, and Thailand, respectively (13,14,29,31,32). During the same period, fluoroquinolone-resistant strains accounted for approximately 10%, 12%, and 1% of all strains in Hong Kong, the Republic of the Philippines, and Thailand, respectively (13,14,29,31,32). Strains with ciprofloxacin MICs of ≥8.0 µg/ml were first isolated in 1994 (10,12,29,31).
In other geographic areas, strains exhibiting intermediate resistance and resistance have been isolated only sporadically, although with increasing frequency. In Sydney, Australia, fluoroquinolone-resistant strains were isolated infrequently in 1991 to 1994, but with dramatically increasing frequency in early 1995 (15). The pattern of isolation of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains in Australia, i.e., infrequent and sporadic isolations for a number of years followed by increasing frequency of isolation over a short period, may be anticipated in other countries unless the fluoroquinolone-resistant strains are controlled in the Far East, where they are now prevalent. In the CDC-sponsored Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project in the United States, the frequency of strains with intermediate resistance has increased significantly from 0.3% (17/5,238) in 1991 to 1.3% (65/4,996) in 1994 (p≤0.001); however, resistant strains accounted for only 0.04% (2/4,996) of strains in 1994 (33,34). In the United States, the increase in strains with intermediate resistance is associated largely, but not exclusively, with the persistence of such strains in Cleveland, Ohio. First detected in 1992, these strains accounted for 16% to 17.5% of isolates in Cleveland in 1994 (26,35). In addition, a sustained outbreak caused by ciprofloxacin-resistant strains has been reported from Seattle, Washington, in 1995; these strains had MICs of 8.0 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin (5).
Many different strains, as defined by penicillin/tetracycline resistance phenotype and auxotype/serovar (A/S) class, exhibit intermediate resistance and resistance to fluoroquinolones (4,5,15,25,26,31,32,36). Fluoroquinolone resistance has been identified frequently in strains that produce ß-lactamase and strains exhibiting chromosomally mediated resistance to penicillin and tetracycline and less frequently in strains that are susceptible to penicillin and tetracycline (4,31,32). Fluoroquinolone resistance has not been documented in strains possessing the 25.2-megadalton TetM-containing plasmid (TRNG) alone or in TRNG strains possessing a ß-lactamase plasmid (31). It should not, however, be assumed that these strains may not develop fluoroquinolone resistance, but rather that resistant strains have not been detected at this time. Many strains, as defined by A/S class, are associated with fluoroquinolone resistance; fluoroquinolone resistance is not associated with the epidemic spread of one or two strains (15,31,32). In Australia, strains exhibiting intermediate resistance and resistance to fluoroquinolones have belonged to 27 different A/S classes; strains with MICs 8.0-16.0 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin have belonged to 6 A/S classes (15). In the Republic of the Philippines, strains belonging to 27 A/S classes exhibited decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin; strains belonging to 10 A/S classes had MICs ≥1.0 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin (31). In Thailand, strains belonging to 13 A/S classes exhibited decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin (32).
The Gonococcal Isolate Surveillance Project monitors the susceptibilities of N. gonorrhoeae isolates to fluoroquinolones in the United States and provides prototype reference strains for quality assurance of susceptibility testing of these agents. Information about antimicrobial resistance in N. gonorrhoeae in the United States is available on the Internet at http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dastlr/gcdir/gono.html.
Fluoroquinolones inhibit the replication of DNA; they are believed to bind to the GyrA region of DNA gyrase, which is attached to DNA, and inhibit the enzyme from supercoiling the DNA (37). Resistance to fluoroquinolones in N. gonorrhoeae is associated with mutations that result in amino acid changes in the A subunit (GyrA) and the B subunit (GyrB) of the DNA gyrase, and in the parC-encoded subunit of topoisomerase IV (37-40). Although mutations in gyrB confer low-level resistance to naladixic acid, high-level quinolone resistance is associated with mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA (41). Topoisomerase IV, encoded by parC and parE in Escherichia coli and believed to be located in the cytoplasmic membrane, is involved in DNA replication but is not as sensitive to fluoroquinolone inhibition as is DNA gyrase (37). No parE analog has been detected in N. gonorrhoeae (37). Mutations in gyrA and parC are most relevant when considering clinically significant levels of fluoroquinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae (37,39,40). Similar results have been obtained in studies of gyrA mutations in both laboratory-adapted strains and clinical isolates (37,39,40): ciprofloxacin-susceptible strains (MICs, <0.03 µg/ml) had no mutations in gyrA and strains with MICs, ≥0.5 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin may have changes in nucleotides 272 and 283 of gyrA. In addition, strains with MICs ≥2.0 had mutations in parC. Mutations in parC were observed only in strains with at least one mutation in gyrA (37,39) and appeared to be associated with an MIC higher than would be expected with the gyrA mutation alone (39). Mutations in gyrA and parC may be characterized by polymerase chain reaction and DNA sequencing (37,39). The transfer of gyrA and parC mutations between gonococcal strains has been demonstrated in vitro (37). The presence of transformation sequences just downstream from the gyrA sequences suggests that transformation may play a role in the spread of gyrA mutations between gonococcal strains in vivo (37). The opportunity for transformation of genes between gonococcal strains, which depends on concurrent infections with multiple strains, has been documented for women and homosexual men (42,43).
In addition to mutations in gyrA and parC, reduced permeability of the cytoplasmic membrane may contribute to low-level resistance to fluoroquinolones in N. gonorrhoeae, e.g., increasing the MIC of one recipient strain from ≤0.002 to 0.06 µg/ml of ciprofloxacin (3,44). This resistance may also be transferred between gonococcal strains by transformation (3).
Continued reports of the isolation of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of N. gonorrhoeae indicate the need for heightened awareness of the potential for increasing prevalence of strains with clinically significant fluoroquinolone resistance. In areas where a fluoroquinolone is used to treat gonorrhea, the following steps are recommended to monitor and control the spread of fluoroquinolone-resistant strains of N. gonorrhoeae.
Susceptibility testing should be performed to detect fluoroquinolone resistant strains. In geographic areas where interpretive criteria have not been proposed, criteria should be developed for results obtained with local test procedures that use strains with known susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin.
Ideally, routine surveillance for emerging fluoroquinolone resistance should be performed in centers where fluoroquinolones are used widely to treat gonorrhea; e.g., a sample of approximately 20 to 50 consecutive isolates should be tested periodically. If ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates are detected, the use of alternative therapies for gonorrhea should be considered; if isolates are ciprofloxacin-susceptible, ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin may be used to treat gonorrhea.
Susceptibilities of isolates from individual patients whose infections did not respond to treatment with a fluoroquinolone should be determined.
A cluster of infections unresponsive to fluoroquinolone therapy may indicate an outbreak caused by a resistant strain.
If treating gonorrhea with a fluoroquinolone, e.g., ciprofloxacin or ofloxacin, never use less than the recommended dose. In the United States, 500 mg of ciprofloxacin or 400 mg ofloxacin should be used.
Because gonococcal infections caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant strains have been acquired frequently in the Far East, clinicians may wish to treat infections possibly acquired in the Far East with 125 mg ceftriaxone, intramuscularly, or 400 mg cefixime, orally, the current CDC-recommended doses for treating gonococcal infections.
The importance of the emergence and spread of fluoroquinolone resistance in N. gonorrhoeae cannot be overstated. Of antimicrobial agents available for treating gonorrhea, broad-spectrum cephalosporins are the only agents to which N. gonorrhoeae is not resistant, and exclusive use of these agents, particularly the orally administered cephalosporins such as cefixime, may result ultimately in the emergence of resistance to these agents. Thus, it is critical to take measures to ensure that fluoroquinolones remain effective for the treatment of uncomplicated gonorrhea for as long as possible.
Dr. Knapp is chief, Gonorrhea, Chlamydia, and Chancroid Branch, Division of AIDS, STD, and TB Laboratory Research, National Center for Infectious Diseases, CDC. Her research interests are antimicrobial resistance in N. gonorrhoeae, the molecular epidemiology of gonococcal strain populations, and the taxonomy of Neisseria spp.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1989;38:S8.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1993;42(RR-14):4–5.
- Corkill JE, Percival A, Lind M. Reduced uptake of ciprofloxacin in a resistant strain of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and transformation of resistance to other strains. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1991;28:601–4.
- Tapsall JW, Lovett R, Munro R. Failure of 500 mg ciprofloxacin therapy in male urethral gonorrhea. Med J Aust. 1992;156:143.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fluoroquinolone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae—Colorado and Washington, 1995. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;20:761–4.
- Kam KM, Wong PW, Cheung MM, Ho NKY. Detection of fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 1996;34:1462–4.
- Ringuette L, Trudeau T, Turcotte T, Yeung K, Rémes R, Perron L, Emergence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin-Quebec, 1994-1995. Can Commun Dis Rep. 1996;22:121–5.
- Gransden WR, Warren CA, Phillips I, Hodges M, Barlow D. Decreased susceptibility of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to ciprofloxacin. Lancet. 1990;335:51.
- Jephcott AE, Turner A. Ciprofloxacin resistance in gonococci. Lancet. 1990;335:165.
- Birley H, McDonald P, Carey P, Fletcher J. High level ciprofloxacin resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Genitourin Med. 1994;70:292–3.
- Gransden WR, Warren C, Phillips I. 4-Fluoroquinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United Kingdom. J Med Microbiol. 1991;34:23–7.
- Turner A, Gough RR, Jephcott AE, McClean AN. Importation into the UK of a strain of Neisseria gonorrhoeae resistant to penicillin, ciprofloxacin, and tetracycline. Genitourin Med. 1995;71:245–65.
- Kam K-M, Lo K-K, Lai C-F, Lee Y-S, Chan C-B. Ofloxacin susceptibilities of 5,667 Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains isolated in Hong Kong. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1993;37:2007–8.
- Kam KM, Lo K-K, Ng K-Y-H, Cheung M-M. Rapid decline in penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Hong Kong associated with emerging 4-fluoroquinolone resistance. Genitourin Med. 1995;71:141–4.
- Tapsall JW, Phillips EA, Shultz TR, Thacker C. Quinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrheoae isolated in Sydney, Australia, 1991 to 1995. Sex Transm Dis. 1996;23:425–8.
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically. 3rd ed., approved standard. Villanova (PA): National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 1993; NCCLS document no. M7-A3;13(25):1-32.
- National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests, 5th ed., approved standard. Villanova (PA): National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 1993; NCCLS document no. M2-A5;13(24):1-32.
- Knapp JS, Hale JA, Wintersheid K, Neal SW, Whittington WL. Proposed criteria for the interpretation of susceptibilities of strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, enoxacin, lomefloxacin, and norfloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2442–5.
- Yeung K-H, Ng L-K, Dillon JR. Evaluation of Etest for testing antimicrobial susceptibilities of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolates with different growth media. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31:3053–5.
- Jaffe HW, Schroeter AL, Reynolds GH, Zaidi AA, Martin JE Jr, Thayer JD. Pharmacokinetic determinants of penicillin cure of gonococcal urethritis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1979;15:587–91.
- Turner A, Jephcott AE, Gough KR. Laboratory detection of ciprofloxacin resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Pathol. 1991;44:169–70.
- Joyce MP, Aying BB, Vaughan GH, Herip DS, Hayes CG, Espinosa G, In vitro sensitivity of Neisseria gonorrhoeae to fluoroquinolone antibiotics in the Republic of the Philippines. Presented at the 6th International Pathogenic Neisseria Conference; Callaway Gardens, GA, Oct 16-21, 1988; Abstract E19.
- Clendennen TE, Echeverria P, Saenguer S, Kees ES, Boslego JW, Wignall FS. Antibiotic susceptibility survey of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Thailand. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992;36:1682–7.
- Putnam SD, Lavin BS, Stone JR, Oldfield EC III, Hooper DG. Evaluation of the standardized disk diffusion and agar dilution antibiotic susceptibility test methods by using strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae from the United States and Southeast Asia. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:974–80.
- Knapp JS, Ohye R, Neal SW, Parekh MC, Higa H, Rice RJ. Emerging in vitro resistance to quinolones in penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains in Hawaii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2200–3.
- Knapp JS, Washington JA, Doyle LJ, Neal SW, Parekh MC, Rice RJ. Persistence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains with decreased susceptibilities to ciprofloxacin and ofloxacin in Cleveland, Ohio from 1992 through 1993. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:2194–6.
- Tapsall JW, Shultz TR, Phillips AE. Characteristics of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Australia showing decreased sensitivity to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. Pathology. 1994;24:27–31.
- Tanaka M, Matsumoto T, Kobayashi T, Uchino U, Kumazawa J. Emergence of in vitro resistance to fluoroquinolones in Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Japan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:2367–70.
- Manalastas R, Abellanosa IP, Melosa VP, Wi TE, Whittington WL, Tuazon C, Fluoroquinolone resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the Republic of the Philippines. Proceedings of the International Union Against the Venereal Diseases and Treponematoses (IUVDT); 1995 Mar 19-23; Singapore. Singapore:Society of Infectious Diseases, 1995:136.
- Abeyewickereme I, Seneratne L, Prithiviraj VB. Rapid emergence of 4-fluoroquinolone resistance with associated decline in penicillinase-producing Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Colombo, Sri Lanka. Genitourin Med. 1996;72:302.
- Knapp JS, Mesola V, Neal SW, Wi TE, Manalastas R, Perine PL, Molecular epidemiology, in 1994, of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Manila and Cebu City, Republic of the Philippines. Sex Transm Dis. 1997;24:1–7.
- Knapp JS, Wongba C, Limpakarnjanarat K, Young NL, Parakh MC, Neal SW, Antimicrobial susceptibilities of strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae in Bangkok, Thailand: 1994-1995. Sex Transm Dis. In press.
- Schwarcz SK, Zenilman JM, Schnell D, Knapp JS, Hook EW III, Thompson S, National surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. JAMA. 1990;264:1413–7.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Gonococcal isolate surveillance project (GISP) Annual Report1994, 4 pages. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/ncidod/dastlr/ gcdir/annrep94.html. Accession date: May 31, 1996.
- Gordon SM, Carlyn CJ, Doyle LJ, Knapp CC, Longworth DL, Hall GS, The emergence of Neisseria gonorrhoeae with decreased susceptibility to ciprofloxacin in Cleveland, Ohio: epidemiology and risk factors. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:465–70.
- Rice RJ, Knapp JS. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains five distinct resistance phenotypes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1994;38:155–8.
- Belland RJ, Morrison SG, Ison C, Huang WM. Neisseria gonorrhoeae acquires mutations in analogous regions of gyrA and parC in fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates. Mol Microbiol. 1994;14:371–80.
- Stein DC, Danaher RJ, Cook TM. Characterization of a gyrB mutation responsible for low-level nalidixic acid resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1991;35:622–6.
- Deguchi T, Yasuda M, Asano M, Tada K, Iwata H, Komeda H, DNA gyrase mutations in fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1995;39:561–3.
- Deguchi T, Yasuda M, Nakano M, Ozeki S, Ezaki Y, Saito I, Quinolone-resistant Neisseria gonorrhoeae: correlation of alterations in the GyrA subunit of DNA gyrase and the ParC subunit of topoisomerase IV with antimicrobial susceptibility profiles. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:1020–3.
- Deguchi T, Yasuda M, Nakano M, Ozeki S, Kanematsu E, Kawada Y, Uncommon occurrence of mutations in the gyrB gene associated with quinolone resistance in clinical isolates of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996;40:2437–8.
- Short HB, Ploscowe VB, Weiss JA, Young FE. Rapid method for auxotyping multiple strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. J Clin Microbiol. 1977;6:244–8.
- Knapp JS, Holmes KK, Bonin P, Hook EW III. Epidemiology of gonorrhea: distribution and temporal changes in auxotype/serovar classes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Sex Transm Dis. 1987;14:26–32.
- Tanaka M, Fukuda H, Hirai K, Hosaka M, Matsumoto T, Kumazawa J. Reduced uptake and accumulation of norfloxacin in resistant strains of Neisseria gonorrhoeae isolated in Japan. Genitourin Med. 1994;70:253–5.
- Table. Criteria for interpreting susceptibilities of Neisseria gonorrhoeae strains to the fluoroquinolones ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, enoxacin, lomefloxacin, and norfloxacina,b
Suggested citation: Knapp JS, Fox KK, Trees DL, and Whittington WL. Fluoroquinolone Resistance in Neisseria gonorrhoeae. Emerg Infect Dis [serial on the Internet]. 1997, Mar [date cited]. Available from http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/3/1/97-0104
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.
- Page created: December 21, 2010
- Page last updated: December 21, 2010
- Page last reviewed: December 21, 2010
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,
National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID)
Office of the Director (OD)