Volume 21, Number 8—August 2015
Dispatch
Human–Bat Interactions in Rural West Africa
Table
Contact |
Community, no. (%) |
||
Buoyem, n = 412 |
Forikrom, n = 362 |
Kwamang, n = 500 |
|
Respondents reporting bat contact | 263 (63.8) | 244 (67.4) | 334 (66.8) |
In houses through broken ceilings | 69 (16.7) | 51 (14.1) | 65 (13) |
In bat roosts on farms | 41 (10) | 28 (7.7) | 63 (12.6) |
In caves | 129 (31.3) | 161 (44.5) | 187 (37.5) |
At work places | 0 | 1 (0.3) | 0 |
In school buildings | 24 (5.8) | 3 (0.8) | 5 (1) |
In other areas | 0 | 0 | 14 (2.8) |
Respondents visiting bat caves | 181 (43.9) | 178 (49.3) | 222 (44.4) |
For religious activities | 19 (4.6) | 79 (21.8) | 5 (1) |
For recreation | 58 (14.1) | 73 (20.2) | 46 (9.2) |
To collect bat guano | 0 | 14 (3.9) | 2 (0.4) |
To fetch water | 1 (0.2) | 0 | 123 (24.6) |
To hunt for bats | 102 (24.8) | 6 (1.7) | 10 (2) |
To farm | 9 (2.2) | 17 (4.7) | 33 (6.6) |
For other reasons | 2(0.5) | 5 (1.4) | 14 (2.8) |
*Data based on focus group discussions and stratified household surveys (Technical Appendix).
Page created: July 15, 2015
Page updated: July 15, 2015
Page reviewed: July 15, 2015
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.