Quantitative SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor-Binding Domain and Neutralizing Antibody Titers in Previously Infected Persons, United States, January 2021–February 2022
Anna Bratcher
, Szu-Yu Kao, Kelly Chun, Christos J. Petropoulos, Adi V. Gundlapalli, Jefferson Jones
1, and Kristie E.N. Clarke
1
Author affiliation: Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA (A. Bratcher); Alan Shawn Feinstein College of Education, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, USA (S.-Y. Kao); Labcorp Esoterix, Calabasas, California, USA (K. Chun); Labcorp-Monogram Biosciences, South San Francisco, California, USA (C.J. Petropoulos); Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta (A.V. Gundlapalli, J. Jones, K.E.N. Clarke)
Main Article
Figure 4
Figure 4. Violin plots of anti-RBD IgG and NT50 titer results by age group in a study of quantitative SARS-CoV-2 spike RBD and neutralizing antibody titers in previously infected persons, United States, January 2021–February 2022. A) Anti-RBD, n = 30,967; B) NT50, n = 744. Anti-RBD measured by Cov2Quant IgG (LabCorp, https://www.labcorp.com) and NT50 measured by PhenoSense SARS-CoV-2 Neutralizing Antibody Assay (Monogram Biosciences, https://monogrambio.labcorp.com). Horizontal lines in plots indicate first quantile, median, and third quantile; black dots indicates means. BAU, binding antibody units; NT50, 50% neutralization titer; RBD, receptor-binding domain.
Main Article
Page created: September 30, 2024
Page updated: October 22, 2024
Page reviewed: October 22, 2024
The conclusions, findings, and opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the official position of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the Public Health Service, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the authors' affiliated institutions. Use of trade names is for identification only and does not imply endorsement by any of the groups named above.